J. Philip Boudreaux

Well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) of the jejunum, ileum, and appendix are also collectively known as midgut carcinoids. Similar to NETs in general, the diagnosed incidence of the midgut NETs is on the rise. Their presenting symptoms vary depending on stage and primary site. Local-regional NETs often present with vague and nonspecific symptoms. Classic carcinoid syndrome is more likely to appear in patients with advanced disease. Local-regional NETs of the small bowel should be resected whenever possible. With the exception of small well-differentiated NETs of the appendix, NETs of the midgut have substantial risk of relapse after resection and need to be followed for at least 7 years.Metastatic/advanced NETs of the midgut are incurable. Optimal management requires a multidisciplinary approach. Somatostatin analogs are effective in the management of carcinoid syndrome. Octreotide long-acting release has also recently been shown to delay disease progression. Liver-directed therapy and surgical debulking can improve quality of life in selected patients. Pivotal phase 3 studies with bevacizumab targeting vascular endothelial growth factor and everolimus targeting mTOR (mammalian target of rapamycin) are ongoing and may lead to improved outcome. Further studies of novel approaches such as peptide receptor radiotherapy are also warranted.

The incidence of posttransplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM) was compared in three groups of renal transplant recipients: nondiabetic patients who had been randomized between 1980 and 1983 to receive antilymphoblast globulin (ALG), azathioprine (AZA), and prednisone (P) (group 1) or cyclosporine (CsA) plus prednisone (group 2). Group 3 consisted of a more recent (1984-85) cohort who were given a combination of azathioprine, cyclosporine, and prednisone (+/- ALG). PTDM developed in 20 of 173 previously nondiabetic 18-55-year-old patients. Three of 47 patients (6.4%) in group 1, 4 of 58 patients (6.9%) in group 2, and 13 of 68 patients in group 3 (19.1%) developed PTDM. Thus in the two groups composing the concurrent prospective randomized trial (groups 1 and 2) the incidence of PTDM did not differ. The subsequent patients who were given a combination of ALG, azathioprine, cyclosporine, and prednisone developed a significantly greater incidence of PTDM even though the total dose of cyclosporine and prednisone were lower than in groups 1 and 2. PTDM usually occurred within two months of transplantation, and 11 of 17 patients who initially required insulin are still dependent upon exogenous insulin. The incidence of PTDM was not significantly affected by sex of the recipient, HLA-type, primary renal disease, rejection episodes, primary vs. secondary transplant, or prior splenectomy. The incidence of PTDM is greater in patients older than 45 (34.2% vs. 5.2%), and heavier than 70 kg (21.1% vs. 5.1%); in recipients of cadaveric allografts (15.7% vs. 4.6%); and in patients who were hospitalized for infections (22.4% vs. 4.7%). CsA levels tended to be higher in the group 2 and 3 patients who developed PTDM than in those who remained nondiabetic. One-year actuarial patient survival in those with PTDM was 83.3% vs. 98% (P less than .01) in the nondiabetic and graft survival was 77.1% vs. 87.1% (NS). The combination of Minnesota ALG, azathioprine, cyclosporine, and prednisone appears to predispose older, heavier recipients of cadaver allografts to the development of PTDM. The risk of PTDM must be weighed against the more usual results of improved patient and graft survival using this combination of immunosuppression.

Between May 1, 1993 and April 5, 1995, 154 pancreas allograft recipients at 9 institutions were given FK506 posttransplant. Three groups were studied: (1) recipients given FK506 initially for induction and maintenance therapy (n = 82), (2) recipients switched to FK506 for antirejection or rescue therapy (n = 61), and (3) recipients converted to FK506 for other reasons (n = 11). Of 82 patients in the induction group, 7 (9%) had simultaneous bone marrow (BM) and pancreas-kidney (SPK-BM) transplants, 54 (66%) had SPK transplants without BM, 14 (17%) had pancreas transplants alone (PTA), and 7 (9%) had pancreas after previous kidney transplants (PAK). All but 1 recipient was given quadruple immunosuppression (anti-T cell agents plus azathioprine and prednisone) for induction. The median FK506 starting dose was 4 mg/day p.o.; the median average FK506 blood level, 12 ng/ml. The most common side effects were neurotoxicity (16%), nephrotoxicity (13%), and gastrointestinal toxicity (9%). New-onset diabetes mellitus requiring permanent insulin therapy did not occur. Of 61 transplants in the rescue group, 44 (72%) were SPK, 11 (18%) PTA, and 6 (10%) PAK. All but 3 (95%) of the recipients had been on cyclosporine-azathioprine-prednisone triple immunosuppression before substitution of FK506 for cyclosporine; 46% of the recipients had one, and 54% > or = 2, rejection episodes preconversion. The most common side effects were nephrotoxicity (25%), neurotoxicity (23%), and gastrointestinal toxicity (21%). Two recipients were reconverted to cyclosporine because of transient hyperglycemia, and one recipient is on insulin. In the induction group, patient survival at 6 months was 90% for SPK, 100% for PTA, and 100% for PAK. According to a matched-pair analysis, pancreas graft survival for SPK recipients at 6 months was 87% for FK506 versus 70% for cyclosporine recipients (P = 0.04); for PTA recipients, 84% versus 66% (P = n.s.); and for PAK recipients, 80% versus 14% (P = 0.11). When technical failures and death with functioning grafts were censored, pancreas graft survival remained significantly better in the FK506 group. The incidence of first reversible rejection episodes by 6 months in FK506 recipients was 35% for SPK, 40% for PTA, and 20% for PAK. Of 75 pancreas grafts, 64 are currently functioning; in 5 recipients the pancreas failed (1 from rejection); 6 recipients died with a functioning pancreas graft. There were 3 posttransplant lymphomas (all EBV-positive); 2 recipients died and 1 is alive after subtotal colectomy and transplant pancreatectomy. In the antirejection rescue group, patient survival rates at 6 months were 91% for SPK, 100% for PTA, and 80% for PAK (P = n.s.). Pancreas graft survival rates at 6 months were 90% for SPK, 72% for PTA, and 40% for PAK. The incidence of first reversible rejection episodes after conversion to FK506 at 6 months was 44% in SPK, 54% in PTA, and 50% in PAK. Of 61 pancreas grafts, 51 are currently functioning; in 7 recipients the pancreas failed (5 from rejection); 3 recipients died with a functioning graft. There were no posttransplant lymphomas in the rescue group. This multicenter survey shows that FK506 in pancreas transplantation is associated with (1) a low rate of graft loss from rejection when used for induction therapy, (2) a high rate of graft salvage when used for rescue or rejection therapy, and (3) a very low rate of new-onset insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. These encouraging results are tarnished by 3 posttransplant lymphomas in the induction group; a possible explanation is overimmunosuppression, but further (randomized) studies are necessary to analyze the long-term risk-benefit ratio of FK506 after pancreas transplantation.

In Brief Objective: To evaluate clinical outcomes in a large group of advanced-stage carcinoid patients (stage IV) following multimodal surgical therapy. Summary Background Data: Patients with advanced-stage carcinoid have traditionally experienced poor 5-year survival (18%–30%). Few recent series have evaluated a large number of patients treated with aggressive surgical rescue therapy. Methods: This single-center retrospective review analyzes the records of 82 consecutive carcinoid patients treated by the same 2 surgeons, from August 1998 through August 2004 with a 3- to 72-month follow-up. Results: Surprisingly, one third of 26 (32%) patients were found to have intestinal obstructions; 10 being moribund at presentation. Mesenteric encasement with intestinal ischemia was successfully relieved in 10 of 12 cases. Five of eighty-two “terminal” patients were rendered free of macroscopic disease. Karnofsky performance scores improved from 65 to 85 (P < 0.0001). Two- and four-year survival for patients with no or unilateral liver metastases (n = 23) was 89%, while 2- and 4-year survival for patients with bilateral liver disease (n = 59) was 68% and 52% (P = 0.072), respectively. Conclusion: We think that all patients with advanced-stage carcinoid should be evaluated for possible multimodal surgical therapy. Primary tumors should be resected, even in the presence of distant metastases to prevent future intestinal obstruction. The “wait and see” method of management of this slow-growing cancer no longer has merit. We offer an algorithm for the surgical evaluation and management of these patients. Eighty-two patients with advanced-stage carcinoid were surgically treated with multimodal cytoreductive therapy. One third of patients had intestinal obstruction, 15% had mesenteric vascular encasement. Karnofsky performance scores improved from 65 to 85 (P < 0.0001); 2- and 4-year survivals were 70% and 52%, respectively, in a group of “terminal” patients.

BACKGROUND: Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are commonly treated with multimodality therapy. The combination of capecitabine and temozolomide (CAPTEM) has been suggested as a treatment option for patients with metastatic NETs. We present our experience with CAPTEM. METHODS: Data on NET patients who were placed on CAPTEM and received at least one cycle were obtained from a Velos eResearch database. Response rate was calculated by RECIST 1.1. Overall survival and progression-free survival (PFS) were calculated by the Kaplan-Meier survival method. RESULTS: A total of 29 patients (17 male and 12 female) were included. Median age at CAPTEM initiation was 58 years (range: 26-77). Primary tumors included 9 small bowel (31%), 15 pancreas (52%), 3 lung (10%), and 2 rectum (7%). Median number of CAPTEM cycles was 8 (range: 1-55). Partial response occurred in 5 patients (5 of 29, 17%); 14 patients (14 of 29, 48%) had stable disease, and 10 patients (10 of 29, 34%) had progressive disease. A total of 3 (20%) and 5 (33%) pancreatic NETs experienced partial response and stable disease, respectively. A total of 2 (14%) and 9 (64%) nonpancreatic NETs experienced partial response and stable disease, respectively. Partial response was noted in 1 patient (13%) and stable disease in 5 patients (63%) with Ki-67 values of less than 2%. In patients with Ki-67 values of 2%-20%, partial response was noted in 3 (19%) and stable disease in 8 (50%). Partial response and stable disease were noted in 1 patient each (20%) with Ki-67 values greater than 20%. Median PFS was 12 months. Adverse reactions caused dose reductions in 24% of patients. CONCLUSION: Although adverse reactions were experienced, most patients tolerated this regimen. CAPTEM should be considered as a reasonable treatment option for metastatic NET patients. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: The role of chemotherapy in neuroendocrine tumors has evolved in recent years. The results of this study suggest that the combination of capecitabine and temozolomide provides an adequate treatment option and may prolong survival in patients with a wide variety of metastatic neuroendocrine tumors. Although prospective data are needed, this research adds to the abundance of retrospective experience with this combination that appears to show that capecitabine and temozolomide could potentially be an option for patients with advanced neuroendocrine tumors who have progressed on standard treatment.