A. Recht

PURPOSE: This analysis was performed to clarify the relationship of young age at diagnosis to the pathologic features of the tumor and prognosis in patients with early-stage breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed data from 1,398 patients with American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging stage I or II breast cancer treated by breast-conserving therapy between 1968 and 1985. One hundred seven patients were younger than 35 years at the time of diagnosis. The median follow-up duration for the 1,032 survivors was 99 months. RESULTS: Patients younger than 35 years had a significantly higher overall recurrence rate (P = .002), as well as a greater risk for developing distant metastases (P = .03), when compared with older patients. The cancers in younger patients more commonly showed factors associated with a worse prognosis (including grade 3 histology, lymphatic vessel invasion [LVI], necrosis, and estrogen receptor [ER] negativity) as compared with older patients. In a proportional hazards model that included clinical and treatment-related variables, as well as these pathologic features, age younger than 35 years remained a significant predictor for time to recurrence (relative risk [RR], 1.70), time to distant failure (RR, 1.60), and overall mortality (RR, 1.50). CONCLUSION: Breast cancer patients younger than 35 years have a worse prognosis than older patients. This difference is only partially explained by a higher frequency of adverse pathologic factors seen in younger patients.

Between 1976 and 1983, 40 women with intraductal carcinoma of the breast without invasion underwent excisional biopsy and irradiation as an alternative to mastectomy. The median age was 53 years (range, 28 to 77 years) and the median follow-up time since initiation of radiation was 44 months (range, 14 to 97 months). Twenty-seven patients presented with a palpable mass; in 13 patients the tumor was detected only by mammography. A limited axillary dissection was performed in 13 patients, and all lymph nodes removed were negative. Treatment was administered to the breast and adjacent chest wall to a dose of 4,600 to 5,000 rad, with 26 patients also receiving a boost dose of 1,000 to 2,000 rad to the site of the primary. Four patients have developed a recurrence in the treated breast, at 17, 19, 35, and 63 months after the beginning of radiation therapy. The 5-year actuarial rate of local recurrence is 10%. Three of the recurrences were in those four patients who presented with a nipple discharge and a central primary. In two cases, the recurrence consisted of only intraductal carcinoma; in the other two, both intraductal and invasive cancer were found. All four patients with recurrence underwent mastectomy and are well without evidence of distant metastases at 1, 12, 15, and 15 months since mastectomy. Cosmetic results were excellent. No patient has developed distant metastases. Since the number of patients treated is small and the period of follow-up is short, one must be cautious in the interpretation of these results. Nonetheless, the treatment of intraductal carcinoma of the breast by excision and irradiation appears to give acceptable local control and excellent survival when suitable precautions of patient selection and evaluation are taken.

From 1968 to 1983, 19 patients were treated at the Joint Center for Radiation Therapy for symptomatic mediastinal masses before a biopsy was obtained. This study evaluates the impact of radiation on the ability to establish a pathologic diagnosis and the results of subsequent empirical therapy if no diagnosis was established. Eight of the 19 (42%) patients were not able to have a histologic diagnosis established at the time of biopsy. Seven of these eight patients went on to receive empiric therapy for what was thought to be the most likely diagnosis on clinical grounds. Four of the seven have not relapsed; three who have relapsed were found to have the diagnosis for which they were empirically treated. The untreated patient relapsed with seminoma. Thus, the use of emergency irradiation for mediastinal masses is sometimes associated with the loss of pathologic diagnosis. These patients likely have a radioresponsive disease (ie, lymphoma or seminoma) that may be treated successfully on the presumed clinical diagnosis even when the histologic diagnosis is lost secondary to prebiopsy irradiation.