Q

Qizhi Fang

Shenyang Aerospace University

Publishes on Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors, Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine, Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications. 72 papers and 2.6k citations.

72Publications
2.6kTotal Citations

Is this you? Claim your profile.

Add your photo, update your bio, and get notified when your ranking changes.

Top publicationsby citations

Fibrin Glue Alone and Skeletal Myoblasts in a Fibrin Scaffold Preserve Cardiac Function after Myocardial Infarction
Karen L. Christman, Hubert H. Fok, Richard E. Sievers et al.|Tissue Engineering|2004
Cited by 415

Current efforts in cardiac tissue engineering center around the use of scaffolds that deliver cells to the epicardial surface. In this study, we examined the effects of fibrin glue as an injectable scaffold and wall support in ischemic myocardium. The left coronary artery of rats was occluded for 17 min, followed by reperfusion. Echocardiography was performed 8 days after infarction. One to 2 days later, either 0.5% bovine serum albumin (BSA) in phosphate-buffered saline, fibrin glue alone, skeletal myoblasts alone, or skeletal myoblasts in fibrin glue were injected into the ischemic left ventricle. Echocardiography was again performed 5 weeks after injection. The animals were then sacrificed and the hearts were fresh frozen and sectioned for histology and immunohistochemistry. Both the fractional shortening (FS) and infarct wall thickness of the BSA group decreased significantly after 5 weeks (p = 0.0005 and 0.02, respectively). In contrast, both measurements for the fibrin glue group, cells group, and cells in fibrin glue group did not change significantly (FS: p = 0.18, 0.89, and 0.19, respectively; wall thickness: p = 0.40, 0.44, 0.43, respectively). Fibrin glue is capable of preserving infarct wall thickness and cardiac function after a myocardial infarction in rats and may be useful as a biomaterial scaffold for myocardial cell transplantation.

Injectable Drug‐Releasing Microporous Annealed Particle Scaffolds for Treating Myocardial Infarction
Jun Fang, Jaekyung Koh, Qizhi Fang et al.|Advanced Functional Materials|2020
Cited by 108Open Access

Intramyocardial injection of hydrogels offers great potential for treating myocardial infarction (MI) in a minimally invasive manner. However, traditional bulk hydrogels generally lack microporous structures to support rapid tissue ingrowth and biochemical signals to prevent fibrotic remodeling toward heart failure. To address such challenges, a novel drug-releasing microporous annealed particle (drugMAP) system is developed by encapsulating hydrophobic drug-loaded nanoparticles into microgel building blocks via microfluidic manufacturing. By modulating nanoparticle hydrophilicity and pregel solution viscosity, drugMAP building blocks are generated with consistent and homogeneous encapsulation of nanoparticles. In addition, the complementary effects of forskolin (F) and Repsox (R) on the functional modulations of cardiomyocytes, fibroblasts, and endothelial cells in vitro are demonstrated. After that, both hydrophobic drugs (F and R) are loaded into drugMAP to generate FR/drugMAP for MI therapy in a rat model. The intramyocardial injection of MAP gel improves left ventricular functions, which are further enhanced by FR/drugMAP treatment with increased angiogenesis and reduced fibrosis and inflammatory response. This drugMAP platform represents a new generation of microgel particles for MI therapy and will have broad applications in regenerative medicine and disease therapy.

Left ventricular mechanical dispersion predicts arrhythmic risk in mitral valve prolapse
Cited by 99Open Access

OBJECTIVE: Bileaflet mitral valve prolapse (MVP) with either focal or diffuse myocardial fibrosis has been linked to ventricular arrhythmia and/or sudden cardiac arrest. Left ventricular (LV) mechanical dispersion by speckle-tracking echocardiography (STE) is a measure of heterogeneity of ventricular contraction previously associated with myocardial fibrosis. The aim of this study is to determine whether mechanical dispersion can identify MVP at higher arrhythmic risk. METHODS: We identified 32 consecutive arrhythmic MVPs (A-MVP) with a history of complex ventricular ectopy on Holter/event monitor (n=23) or defibrillator placement (n=9) along with 27 MVPs without arrhythmic complications (NA-MVP) and 39 controls. STE was performed to calculate global longitudinal strain (GLS) as the average peak longitudinal strain from an 18-segment LV model and mechanical dispersion as the SD of the time to peak strain of each segment. RESULTS: MVPs had significantly higher mechanical dispersion compared with controls (52 vs 42 ms, p=0.005) despite similar LV ejection fraction (62% vs 63%, p=0.42) and GLS (-19.7 vs -21, p=0.045). A-MVP and NA-MVP had similar demographics, LV ejection fraction and GLS (all p>0.05). A-MVP had more bileaflet prolapse (69% vs 44%, p=0.031) with a similar degree of mitral regurgitation (mostly trace or mild in both groups) (p>0.05). A-MVP exhibited greater mechanical dispersion when compared with NA-MVP (59 vs 43 ms, p=0.0002). Mechanical dispersion was the only significant predictor of arrhythmic risk on multivariate analysis (OR 1.1, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.11, p=0.006). CONCLUSIONS: STE-derived mechanical dispersion may help identify MVP patients at higher arrhythmic risk.