R A McClelland

We developed an immunocytochemical technique to visualize the receptors for 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D [1,25-(OH)2D receptor] in cryostat sections of normal human tissues, using a rat monoclonal antibody (9A7 gamma) to the chick intestinal receptor, which has been found to react with mammalian 1,25-(OH)2D receptors. Localization of the antigen was predominantly nuclear, with little cytoplasmic immunoreactivity. Specific staining was seen in the nuclei of many normal epithelial tissues, including liver, kidney, thyroid, adrenal, gastrointestinal tract, breast, and skin. No nuclear staining was seen when tissue sections were incubated with normal rat immunoglobulin G or when the monoclonal antibody was preincubated with a receptor-enriched chick intestinal cytosol preparation. Our results demonstrate that the receptor for 1,25-(OH)2D is localized in the nucleus and widely distributed in normal human tissues.

Frozen sections of breast tumor tissue have been stained using an immunoperoxidase [estrogen receptor (ER)-immunocytochemistry] kit incorporating a monoclonal antiserum [H222] to visualize nuclear human ERs. Quantitation of specific staining has been performed by manual procedures using optical microscopy and by a computer-assisted image analysis system (CAS 100). Initial investigations with a test panel of ER-immunocytochemistry-positive tumors revealed a good qualitative agreement between CAS and manual assessments. Reduced variance was, however, observed between quantified ER-immunocytochemistry results from four experienced investigators using the CAS analysis. An extended study confirmed the relationships between CAS and manual methods of assessment. These findings were evident when studies were scored either by assessment of the percentage of positively stained cells (n = 92; r = 0.919; P less than 0.01) or by H-score calculations (n = 92; r = 0.913; P less than 0.01). A good correlation was also found between CAS quantification and the results of an ER enzyme immunoassay of 48 primary breast cancer specimens (r = 0.715; P less than 0.05). In 49 cases it was possible to relate CAS-defined ER status and levels to the subsequent response of patients to endocrine therapy. ER was assessed on specimens obtained prior to commencement of treatments for recurrent breast cancer. Presuming the presence of ER to be a prerequisite for successful therapy, very good correlations between response and both status and levels of positivity were recorded. None of 16 patients with CAS-ER-negative tumors responded to treatment, while 16 of 33 (48.4%) CAS-ER-positive patients achieved an objective response according to International Union Against Cancer criteria. A relationship between response and the degree of CAS-ER positivity was obtained when the CAS score divisions of 0, 1-100, and greater than 100 (response rates, 0, 41, and 64%, respectively) were used. These data demonstrate that automated image analysis offers a reliable, reproducible procedure for quantifying ER in immunocytochemically stained sections. It has potential advantages over manual procedures, providing less opportunity for subjective influences in scoring sections. Future advances in software design should further reduce elements of subjectivity and increase both the speed and reliability of results. We anticipate image analysis becoming a valuable tool in investigations concerning, for example, the influence of heterogeneity of steroid receptor distribution on the rate of recurrence of breast cancer after mastectomy and in the clinical course of the disease.

Although many estrogen receptor-positive breast cancers initially respond to antihormones, responses are commonly incomplete with resistance ultimately emerging. Delineation of signaling mechanisms underlying these phenomena would allow development of therapies to improve antihormone response and compromise resistance. This in vitro investigation in MCF-7 breast cancer cells examines whether epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) signaling limits antiproliferative and proapoptotic activity of antihormones and ultimately supports development of resistance. It addresses whether the anti-EGFR agent gefitinib (ZD1839/Iressa; TKI: 1 mum) combined with the antihormones 4-hydroxytamoxifen (TAM: 0.1 mum) or fulvestrant (Faslodex; 0.1 mum) enhances growth inhibition and prevents resistance. TAM significantly suppressed MCF-7 growth over wk 2-5, reducing proliferation detected by immunocytochemistry and fluorescence-activated cell sorter cell cycle analysis. A modest apoptotic increase was observed by fluorescence-activated cell sorter and fluorescence microscopy, with incomplete bcl-2 suppression. EGFR induction occurred during TAM response, as measured by immunocytochemistry and Western blotting, with EGFR-positive, highly proliferative resistant growth subsequently emerging. Although TKI alone was ineffective on growth, TAM plus TKI cotreatment exhibited superior antigrowth activity vs. TAM, with no viable cells by wk 12. Cotreatment was more effective in inhibiting proliferation, promoting apoptosis, and eliminating bcl-2. Cotreatment blocked EGFR induction, markedly depleted ERK1/2 MAPK and protein kinase B phosphorylation, and prevented emergence of EGFR-positive resistance. Faslodex plus TKI cotreatment was also a superior antitumor strategy. Thus, increased EGFR evolves during treatment with antihormones, limiting their efficacy and promoting resistance. Gefitinib addition to antihormonal therapy could prove more effective in treating estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer and may combat development of resistance.

Multiple lines of evidence implicate steroid hormone and growth factor cross-talk as a modulator of endocrine response in breast cancer and that aberrations in growth factor signaling pathways are a common element in the endocrine resistant phenotype. Delineation of these relationships is thus an important diagnostic goal in cancer research, while the targeting of aberrant growth factor signaling holds the promise of improving therapeutic response rates.