The role of intraoperative frozen sections in revision total joint arthroplasty.David S. Feldman, Jess H. Lonner, Panna Desai et al.|Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery|1995 We performed a retrospective analysis of thirty-three consecutive total hip and knee (twenty-three hip and ten knee) revision arthroplasties during which intraoperative frozen sections were analyzed. Data for the study were collected by means of a review of the charts, radiographic analysis, and evaluation of both frozen and permanent histological sections. The frozen sections, of periprosthetic tissue at the bone-cement interface or the pseudocapsule, were considered positive for active infection if there were more than five polymorphonuclear leukocytes per high-power field in at least five distinct microscopic fields. All patients were available for follow-up, at an average of thirty-six months (range, seventeen to seventy-nine months) after the initial revision operation. The frozen sections from ten patients were positive for infection, and those from twenty-three patients were negative. Comparison of the results of the analyses of the frozen sections (both positive and negative) with those of the analyses of the permanent histological sections of similar tissue showed a correlation of 100 per cent (sensitivity, 1.00; specificity, 1.00; and accuracy, 1.00). Nine patients had positive intraoperative cultures, and all of them had positive frozen sections (sensitivity, 1.00). Of the twenty-four patients who had negative intraoperative cultures, twenty-three had negative frozen sections (specificity, 0.96). Of the nine patients who had positive intraoperative cultures, only two were found to have infection on intraoperative gram-staining. The surgeon's operative assessment regarding the presence of infection, compared with the final pathological diagnosis, demonstrated a sensitivity of 0.70, a specificity of 0.87, and an accuracy of 0.82. All ten patients who had positive frozen sections were managed with excision arthroplasty; six of them subsequently had reimplantation, and the excision was the definitive procedure in the remaining four. One patient who had had a delayed reimplantation had a secondary skin slough and eventually was managed with an arthrodesis of the knee. In the group that had negative frozen sections, eighteen patients had a primary exchange revision arthroplasty and five had a delayed reimplantation. At the time of follow-up, one patient who had had a delayed reimplantation had radiographic loosening of the femoral component and was asymptomatic. One patient who had had a primary exchange arthroplasty was managed with a second revision because of aseptic loosening. There was no clinical recurrence of infection in any patient. The data indicate that analysis of frozen sections of periprosthetic tissue is a reliable predictor of the presence of active infection during revision joint arthroplasty. We recommend its use to differentiate aseptic from septic loosening.
The Reliability of Analysis of Intraoperative Frozen Sections for Identifying Active Infection during Revision Hip or Knee Arthroplasty*†Jess H. Lonner, Panna Desai, Paul E. DiCesare et al.|Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery|1996 A prospective study was performed to determine the reliability of analysis of intraoperative frozen sections for the identification of infection during 175 consecutive revision total joint arthroplasties (142 hip and thirty-three knee). The mean interval between the primary and the revision arthroplasty was 7.3 years (range, three months to twenty-three years). To reduce selections bias, tissue was obtained for frozen sections during all revisions in patients who did not have active drainage from the wound or a sinus tract. Of the 175 patients, twenty-three had at least five polymorphonuclear leukocytes per high-power field on analysis of the frozen sections and were considered to have an infection. Of these twenty-three, five had five to nine polymorphonuclear leukocytes per high-power field and eighteen had at least ten polymorphonuclear leukocytes per high-power field. The frozen sections for the remaining 152 patients were considered negative. On the basis of cultures of specimens obtained at the time of the revision operation, nineteen of the 175 patients were considered to have an infection. Of the 152 patients who had negative frozen sections, three were considered to have an infection on the basis of the results of the final cultures. Of the twenty-three patients who had positive frozen sections, sixteen were considered to have an infection on the basis of the results of the final cultures; all sixteen had frozen sections that had demonstrated at least ten polymorphonuclear leukocytes per high-power field. The sensitivity and specificity of the frozen sections were similar regardless of whether an index of five or ten polymorphonuclear leukocytes per high-power field was used. Analysis of the frozen sections had a sensitivity of 84 per cent for both indices, whereas the specificity was 96 per cent when the index was five polymorphonuclear leukocytes and 99 per cent when it was ten polymorphonuclear leukocytes. However, the positive predictive value of the frozen sections increased significantly (p < 0.05), from 70 to 89 per cent, when the index increased from five to ten polymorphonuclear leukocytes per high-power field. The negative predictive value of the frozen sections was 98 per cent for both indices. The current study suggests that it is valuable to obtain tissue for intraoperative frozen sections during revision hip and knee arthroplasty. At least ten polymorphonuclear leukocytes per high-power field was predictive of infection, while five to nine polymorphonuclear leukocytes per high-power field was not necessarily consistent with infection. Less than five polymorphonuclear leukocytes per high-power field reliably indicated the absence of infection.
Analysis of Frozen Sections of Intraoperative Specimens Obtained at the Time of Reoperation After Hip or Knee Resection Arthroplasty for the Treatment of Infection*Craig J. Della Valle, Eric Bogner, Panna Desai et al.|Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery|1999 BACKGROUND: Despite the effectiveness of a two-stage exchange protocol for the treatment of deep periprosthetic infection, infection can persist after resection arthroplasty and treatment with antibiotics, leading to a failed second-stage reconstruction. Intraoperative analysis of frozen sections has been shown to have a high sensitivity and specificity for the identification of infection at the time of revision arthroplasty; however, the usefulness of this test at the time of reoperation after resection arthroplasty and treatment with antibiotics is, to our knowledge, unknown. METHODS: The medical records of sixty-four consecutive patients who had had a resection arthroplasty of either the knee (thirty-three patients) or the hip (thirty-one patients) and had had intraoperative analysis of frozen sections of periprosthetic tissue obtained at the time of a second-stage operation were reviewed. The mean interval between the resection arthroplasty and the attempted reimplantation was nineteen weeks. The results of the intraoperative analysis of the frozen sections were compared with those of analysis of permanent histological sections of the same tissues and with those of intraoperative cultures of specimens obtained from within the joint. The findings of the analyses of the frozen sections and the permanent histological sections were considered to be consistent with acute inflammation and infection if a mean of ten polymorphonuclear leukocytes or more per high-power field (forty times magnification) were seen in the five most cellular areas. RESULTS: The intraoperative frozen sections of the specimens from two patients (one of whom was considered to have a persistent infection) met the criteria for acute inflammation. Four patients were considered to have a persistent infection on the basis of positive intraoperative cultures or permanent histological sections. Overall, intraoperative analysis of frozen sections at the time of reimplantation after resection arthroplasty had a sensitivity of 25 percent (detection of one of four persistent infections), a specificity of 98 percent, a positive predictive value of 50 percent (one of two), a negative predictive value of 95 percent, and an accuracy of 94 percent. CONCLUSIONS: A negative finding on intraoperative analysis of frozen sections has a high predictive value with regard to ruling out the presence of infection; however, the sensitivity of the test for the detection of persistent infection is poor.
Investigations into the Fat Pads of the Sole of the Foot: Anatomy and HistologyAnatomical, histological, and histochemical studies were performed on normal and abnormal fat pads of the sole of cadaver feet. The fat pads were found to contain a significant nerve and blood supply separate from that to the surrounding musculature and skin. Pacinian corpuscles and free nerve endings within the fat were identified. Histological analysis indicated a meshwork of fibroelastic septae arranged in a closed-cell configuration. The mechanical consequences of this organization are discussed in the context of the weightbearing role of the fat pads of the feet. Alterations seen in dysvascular or senescent feet are consistent with the hypothesis that the septal anatomy of the fat pads is central to their cushioning function.
Granulomatous inflammation after Hylan G-F 20 viscosupplementation of the knee : a report of six cases.BACKGROUND: Recently, intra-articular viscosupplementation with hyaluronate-derived products has gained popularity as a palliative modality for the treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee. Mild pain or swelling at the site of injection may occur in up to 20% of patients, although severe local inflammation, warmth, and joint effusion are rare. We present a series of six cases in which granulomatous inflammation of the synovium was observed after hyaluronate viscosupplementation of the knee. METHODS: Six knees (five patients) treated with intra-articular Hylan G-F 20 viscosupplementation underwent a surgical procedure because of persistent symptoms. Routine histopathological evaluation, supplemented by alcian-blue staining and hyaluronidase digestion, was performed in each case. RESULTS: Chronically inflamed synovium with areas of histiocytic and foreign-body giant-cell reaction was observed surrounding acellular, amorphous material. The material stained with alcian blue, a stain for hyaluronate, which disappeared after hyaluronidase digestion. CONCLUSIONS: We believe that the injected hyaluronate (Hylan G-F 20) may have been responsible for the synovitis in our patients and thus may be a pathological cause of recalcitrant symptoms after such injection. It is not known whether the responsible pathological agent was the hyaluronate derivative, a contaminant of the purification process, or a component of the carrier substance. Importantly, it appears that the findings in these patients most likely represent a previously unreported pathological response to a viscosupplementation product. This report should raise clinical awareness about this potential complication.