D

Doris Lutz

University Hospital of Basel

Publishes on Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments, European Socioeconomic and Political Studies, Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments. 8 papers and 251 citations.

8Publications
251Total Citations

Is this you? Claim your profile.

Add your photo, update your bio, and get notified when your ranking changes.

Top publicationsby citations

Pretransplant Risk Assessment in Renal Allograft Recipients Using Virtual Crossmatching
D Bielmann, Gideon Hönger, Doris Lutz et al.|American Journal of Transplantation|2007
Cited by 144Open Access

Preformed donor-specific HLA-antibodies antibodies (DSA) are a major risk for early antibody-mediated rejection (AMR). This prospective study evaluated the accuracy of pretransplant risk assessment using virtual crossmatching (virtualXM) (i.e. comparing HLA-typing of the donor with the recipient’s HLA-antibody specificities determined by flow-beads). Sixty-five consecutive patients were stratified according to virtualXM results: patients without DSA (n = 56) were considered low risk and received standard immunosuppression; patients with DSA (n = 9) were considered high risk and received additional induction with anti-T-lymphocyte-globulin (ATG) and intravenous immunoglobulins. Despite induction therapy 4 of 9 patients with DSA (44%) had clinical/subclinical AMR, whereas only 2 of 56 patients without DSA (4%) (p = 0.002). Notably, one of these two patients had early AMR likely induced by non-HLA-antibodies; the other had subclinical AMR at month 6 consistent with de novo DSA. The results of virtualXM and retrospectively obtained flow-cytometric crossmatches (FCXM) (n = 59) were concordant in 51 patients (86%), four patients (7%) were virtualXM−/FCXM+ and none had AMR, four patients (7%) were virtualXM+/FCXM− and one had AMR. VirtualXM can accurately define absence or presence of DSA and may become an invaluable tool for organ allocation and pretransplant risk assessment. However, further studies need to address whether all HLA-antibodies detected by flow-beads are clinically relevant. Preformed donor-specific HLA-antibodies antibodies (DSA) are a major risk for early antibody-mediated rejection (AMR). This prospective study evaluated the accuracy of pretransplant risk assessment using virtual crossmatching (virtualXM) (i.e. comparing HLA-typing of the donor with the recipient’s HLA-antibody specificities determined by flow-beads). Sixty-five consecutive patients were stratified according to virtualXM results: patients without DSA (n = 56) were considered low risk and received standard immunosuppression; patients with DSA (n = 9) were considered high risk and received additional induction with anti-T-lymphocyte-globulin (ATG) and intravenous immunoglobulins. Despite induction therapy 4 of 9 patients with DSA (44%) had clinical/subclinical AMR, whereas only 2 of 56 patients without DSA (4%) (p = 0.002). Notably, one of these two patients had early AMR likely induced by non-HLA-antibodies; the other had subclinical AMR at month 6 consistent with de novo DSA. The results of virtualXM and retrospectively obtained flow-cytometric crossmatches (FCXM) (n = 59) were concordant in 51 patients (86%), four patients (7%) were virtualXM−/FCXM+ and none had AMR, four patients (7%) were virtualXM+/FCXM− and one had AMR. VirtualXM can accurately define absence or presence of DSA and may become an invaluable tool for organ allocation and pretransplant risk assessment. However, further studies need to address whether all HLA-antibodies detected by flow-beads are clinically relevant.

Incidence and Prediction of Early Antibody-Mediated Rejection due to Non-Human Leukocyte Antigen-Antibodies
Patrizia Amico, Gideon Hönger, D Bielmann et al.|Transplantation|2008
Cited by 95

BACKGROUND: Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) is responsible for a large proportion of early allograft losses. While preformed donor-specific human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-antibodies (HLA-DSA) are accountable for the majority of these episodes, non-HLA-DSA are also involved. However, data on the incidence of early AMR due to non-HLA-DSA are currently lacking. METHODS: This study evaluated (i) the incidence of early AMR due to non-HLA-DSA -- defined by exclusion of circulating HLA-DSA detected by flow beads -- and (ii) the association with donor-specific major histocompatibility complex class I chain-related gene (MICA)-antibodies (MICA-DSA) and angiotensin-receptor antibodies. A retrospective cohort (n=279) risk stratified by complement-dependent cytotoxicity crossmatches (CDC-XM era) and a prospective cohort (n=154) risk stratified by virtual crossmatching using flow beads (virtual-XM era) were investigated. RESULTS: In the CDC-XM era 25/279 patients (9%) developed early AMR, but only 3/154 patients (2%) in the virtual-XM era (P=0.004). The incidence of early AMR due to HLA-DSA was significantly higher in the CDC-XM era than in virtual-XM era (18/279 patients [6.5%] vs. 0/154 patients [0%]; P=0.0005). However, the incidence of early AMR presumably due to non-HLA-DSA remained unchanged in these two cohorts (7/279 patients [2.5%] vs. 3/154 patients [2%]; P=1.0) consistent with a persisting gap in the ability to identify preformed DSA. Overall, 10/433 patients (2.3%) experienced early AMR presumably due to non-HLA-DSA. None of these 10 patients had angiotensin-receptor antibodies, at most 3/10 patients had MICA-DSA, while the antibodies remained unexplained in 7/10 cases. CONCLUSION: Early AMR due to non-HLA-DSA is a rare event, which is still difficult to predict by currently available assays.

The intact porcine bioprosthesis: early world-wide clinical experience and analysis of a single institution's experience
F. Vermeulen, Gerardus Bennink, S. Ernst et al.|European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery|1992
Cited by 11

The Intact porcine bioprosthesis is a new-generation valve fixed under stress-free conditions and subjected to a mineralization-inhibiting treatment. The valve is undergoing multi-centre prospective clinical evaluation sponsored by Medtronic, Inc., with 19 centres participating world wide. Since April 1986, 1465 valves have been implanted in the aortic position (AVR, n = 965), mitral position (MVR, n = 438), or both (n = 62), and followed up to 5 years. The data recorded at our participating centre, with 115 valves implanted (AVR n = 93, MVR n = 22) closely match the overall event and death rates in the prospective study. Early mortality in the overall study is 5.6% in AVR and 6.6% in MVR; 3-year actuarial survival rates are 88.5% in AVR and 85.6% in MVR; structural valve-failure-free rates at 3 years are 99.8% in AVR and 98.5% in MVR; 3-year freedom from valve-related reoperation is 97.3% in AVR and 95.8% in MVR. The preferential use of bioprosthetic valves in patients aged 70 years and older with no other indication for anticoagulant treatment entails the not infrequent occurrence of patient/prosthesis mismatch in AVR. Hence, when implanting bioprostheses in old patients, the acceptance of some mismatch has to be weighed against the freedom from anticoagulation treatment and the expected long-term freedom from structural valve failure. Further long-term follow-up will be required to demonstrate the greater durability expected from the stress-free fixation and the anti-mineralization treatment.