J

J.M. Coindre

Université de Bordeaux

Publishes on Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment, Vascular Tumors and Angiosarcomas, Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment. 47 papers and 2.3k citations.

47Publications
2.3kTotal Citations

Is this you? Claim your profile.

Add your photo, update your bio, and get notified when your ranking changes.

Top publicationsby citations

Comparative study of the National Cancer Institute and French Federation of Cancer Centers Sarcoma Group grading systems in a population of 410 adult patients with soft tissue sarcoma.
L Guillou, J.M. Coindre, F. Bonichon et al.|Journal of Clinical Oncology|1997
Cited by 868

PURPOSE Several histologic grading systems have been validated in soft tissue sarcomas (STS), but no system is currently accepted worldwide. The National Cancer Institute (NCI) and French Federation of Cancer Centers Sarcoma Group (FNCLCC) systems were examined comparatively in the same population of patients with STS to determine which system is the best prognosticator with regard to metastasis development and tumor mortality. PATIENTS AND METHODS Four hundred ten adult patients with nonmetastatic STS were examined. Histologic grade was established according to the NCI and FNCLCC systems in each case. The prognostic value of both systems was examined using univariate and multivariate (Cox's model) analyses, and special attention was devoted to tumors with discordant grades. RESULTS In univariate analysis, both the NCI and FNCLCC systems were of prognostic value to predict metastasis development and tumor mortality. In multivariate analysis, high-grade tumors, irrespective of the system used, size > or = 10 cm, and deep location were found to be independent prognostic factors for the advent of metastases. Tumor grade had a higher predictive value than size or depth, and higher prognostic weight was assigned to the FNCLCC grading system in Cox models. Grade discrepancies were observed in 34.6% of the cases. An increased number of grade 3 STS, a reduced number of grade 2 STS, and a better correlation with overall and metastasis-free survival within subpopulations with discordant grades were observed in favor of the FNCLCC system. CONCLUSION The FNCLCC system showed slightly increased ability to predict distant metastasis development and tumor mortality. The use of this system to evaluate STS aggressiveness might be favored.

Prognostic factors in adult patients with locally controlled soft tissue sarcoma. A study of 546 patients from the French Federation of Cancer Centers Sarcoma Group.
J.M. Coindre, Philippe Terrier, N.B. Bui et al.|Journal of Clinical Oncology|1996
Cited by 632

PURPOSE: To define the prognostic factors in adult patients with locally controlled soft tissue sarcoma (STS) and to determine which patients should be considered for adjuvant treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Five hundred forty-six patients with a nonmetastatic and locally controlled STS, collected in a cooperative data base by the French Federation of Cancer Centers (FNCLCC) Sarcoma Group from 1980 and 1989, were studied. Histologic slides of all patients were collegially reviewed. Initial treatment consisted of complete tumor resection with amputation in only 4% of the patients. Adjuvant radiotherapy was administered to 57.9% and adjuvant chemotherapy to 31%. Relationships between tumor characteristics were analyzed, and univariate and multivariate analyses were performed using Cox models for the hazards rate of tumor mortality, development of distant metastasis, and strictly local recurrence. RESULTS: Unfavorable characteristics with an independent prognostic value for tumor mortality were: grade 3 (P = 3 x 10(-10)), male sex (P = 1.5 x 10(-5)), no adjuvant chemotherapy (P = 5.4 x 10(-5)), tumor size > or = 5 cm (P = 3.8 x 10(-3)), and deep location (P = 4.6 x 10(-3)). Unfavorable characteristics for the development of distant metastasis were: grade 3 (P = 4 x 10(-12)), no adjuvant chemotherapy (P = 6.4 x 10(-4)), tumor size > or = 10 cm (P = 9.8 x 10(-4)), and deep location (P = 1.3 x 10(-3)). For the development of local recurrence, the unfavorable characteristics were: no adjuvant radiotherapy (P = 3.6 x 10(-6)), poor surgery (local excision) (P = 2 x 10(-4)), grade 3 (P = 7.6 x 10(-4)), and deep location (P = 10(-2)). Grade, depth, and tumor size were used to define groups of patients according to the metastatic risk. Adjuvant chemotherapy was beneficial in terms of overall survival and metastasis-free survival in grade 3 tumor patients only. Despite worse characteristics concerning tumor depth, tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) and American Joint Committee (AJC)/International Union Against Cancer (UICC) classifications and grade in patients with adjuvant radiotherapy, the latter experienced significantly fewer local recurrences than patients with no radiotherapy. CONCLUSION: Grade, tumor depth, and tumor size could be used to select patients with a high metastatic risk, for which adjuvant chemotherapy could be beneficial.