Karolinska University Hospital
Publishes on Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments, Colorectal and Anal Carcinomas, Neuroendocrine Tumor Research Advances. 107 papers and 8.9k citations.
Add your photo, update your bio, and get notified when your ranking changes.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the long-term effects on survival and recurrence rates of preoperative radiotherapy in the treatment of curatively operated rectal cancer patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Of 1,168 randomly assigned patients in the Swedish Rectal Cancer Trial between 1987 and 1990, 908 had curative surgery; 454 of these patients had surgery alone, and 454 were administered preoperative radiotherapy (25 Gy in 5 days) followed by surgery within 1 week. Follow-up was performed by matching against three Swedish nationwide registries (the Swedish Cancer Register, the Hospital Discharge Register, and the Cause of Death Register). RESULTS: Median follow-up time was 13 years (range, 3 to 15 years). The overall survival rate in the irradiated group was 38% v 30% in the nonirradiated group (P = .008). The cancer-specific survival rate in the irradiated group was 72% v 62% in the nonirradiated group (P = .03), and the local recurrence rate was 9% v 26% (P < .001), respectively. The reduction of local recurrence rates was observed at all tumor heights, although it was not statistically significant for tumors greater than 10 cm from the anal verge. CONCLUSION: Preoperative radiotherapy with 25 Gy in 1 week before curative surgery for rectal cancer is beneficial for overall and cancer-specific survival and local recurrence rates after long-term follow-up.
BACKGROUND: From 1980 to 1987, 849 patients with clinically resectable rectal adenocarcinoma were randomized into a controlled clinical trial to evaluate the role of preoperative radiotherapy. METHODS: Patients were given either 25 Gy during 5 to 7 days before surgery or underwent surgery alone. RESULTS: At a median follow-up time of 107 months (range, 62-144 months) the incidence of pelvic recurrence among 684 "curatively" operated patients was significantly lower among those who also received radiotherapy (P < 0.001) in all Dukes' stages. No significant difference was observed between the treatment groups with regard to frequency of distant metastases or overall survival. The time to local recurrence or distant metastasis and survival was significantly prolonged in the irradiated group. However, the postoperative mortality was 8% in the radiotherapy group compared with 2% in the surgery only group (P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative short term radiotherapy reduced the incidence of pelvic recurrences and prolonged survival related to rectal cancer compared with surgery alone. The postoperative morbidity was significantly higher in the irradiated group.
BACKGROUND: An audit of all patients with rectal cancer in Sweden was launched in 1995. This is the first report from the Swedish Rectal Cancer Registry (SRCR). METHODS: Between 1995 and 2003, 13 434 patients treated for adenocarcinoma of the rectum were registered with the SRCR; there were approximately 1500 new patients annually. RESULTS: Approximately half had an anterior resection, a quarter an abdominoperineal resection and 15 per cent a Hartmann's procedure. The median 30-day postoperative mortality rate was 2.4 per cent and the overall postoperative morbidity rate was 35.0 per cent. The 5-year cancer-specific survival rate was 62.3 per cent. The 5-year relative survival rate was 70.1 per cent after anterior resection, 59.8 per cent after abdominoperineal resection and 39.8 per cent after a Hartmann's procedure. The crude 5-year local recurrence rate was 9.5 per cent overall, 6.1 per cent after preoperative radiotherapy and 11.4 per cent after surgery alone. For 3868 patients who had a locally curative procedure the local recurrence rate was 7.4 per cent overall, 5.9 per cent for those who had radiotherapy and 10.2 per cent for those who did not. The local recurrence rate was 2.9 per cent (28 of 968) for stage I disease, 7.9 per cent (112 of 1418) for stage II, 13.9 per cent (188 of 1357) for stage III and 8.5 per cent (45 of 532) for stage IV. CONCLUSION: These good population-based results are due, in part, to the nationwide prospective quality assurance registration.