Rasim H. Berk

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine the extent to which consumer and provider reports of primary care differ according to particular characteristics of the primary care setting. METHODS: A random sample of consumers was surveyed by telephone in a defined geographic area of Washington, DC, to determine their experiences with care provided to a randomly chosen child. The primary care provider of each respondent was sent a parallel survey. Scores were obtained for each of two subdomains in the four cardinal primary care domains (first contact, longitudinality, comprehensiveness, and coordination) and for three related domains (family centeredness, community orientation, and cultural competence). Differences between settings that did or did not impose limitations on autonomy for referrals and between fee-for-service and capitated settings were ascertained. RESULTS: Both consumers and their providers in settings characterized by high degrees of limitation on physician autonomy or by capitation reported better first-contact accessibility and a greater range of services available than did consumers in settings with low degrees of limitation, or by fee-for-service reimbursements to physicians. Consumers but not providers reported better family centeredness in these settings. Most other differences favored these settings as well, but these were not consistently statistically significant for both providers and consumers in both types of settings. CONCLUSIONS: The quality of primary care services in different settings can be ascertained by using an instrument with demonstrated reliability and convergent validity. Although certain types of settings, in the particular geographic area studied, appear to perform better in several key aspects of the primary care, replication of the study in other areas would be useful judging the performance of the newer types of settings to be superior to more conventional care for general populations.

OBJECT: Primary chondrosarcoma of the spine is extremely rare. During the last 43 years only 21 patients with this disease were registered at The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center. The purpose of this study was to examine the demographic characteristics, treatments, and outcomes of this set of patients. METHODS: Medical records for 21 patients were reviewed. Age, sex, race, clinical presentation, tumor histology, tumor location in the spinal column, treatments, surgical details, and response to treatment were recorded. Surgical procedures were categorized as either gross-total resection or subtotal excision of tumor. Neurological function was assessed using Frankel's functional classification. Time to recurrence and survival analyses were performed using the Kaplan-Meier method. The median age of patients was 51 years, with fairly equal gender representation. Eighteen patients underwent at least one surgical procedure for a total of 28 surgical procedures: seven radical resections and 21 subtotal excisions. Radiation therapy was used in conjunction with 10 of the 28 surgical procedures. The median Kaplan-Meier estimate of overall survival for the entire group was 6 years (range 6 months-17 years). Tumors recurred after 18 of the 28 procedures. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed a statistically significant difference in the per-procedure disease-free interval after gross-total resection relative to subtotal excision (exact log rank 3.39; p = 0.04). The addition of radiation therapy prolonged the median disease-free interval from 16 to 44 months, although this was not statistically significant (exact log rank 2.63; p = 0.16). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that gross-total resection of the chondrosarcoma provides the best chance for prolonging the disease-free interval in patients. Subtotal excision should be avoided whenever possible. Addition of radiation therapy does not appear to lengthen significantly the disease-free interval in this patient population.