Measurement of the Depth of Maximum of Extensive Air Showers above<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mn>18</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mtext> </mml:mtext><mml:mtext> </mml:mtext><mml:mi>eV</mml:mi></mml:math>J. Abraham, P. Abreu, M. Aglietta et al.|Physical Review Letters|2010 We describe the measurement of the depth of maximum, ${X}_{\mathrm{max}}$, of the longitudinal development of air showers induced by cosmic rays. Almost 4000 events above ${10}^{18}\text{ }\text{ }\mathrm{eV}$ observed by the fluorescence detector of the Pierre Auger Observatory in coincidence with at least one surface detector station are selected for the analysis. The average shower maximum was found to evolve with energy at a rate of $({106}_{\ensuremath{-}21}^{+35})\text{ }\text{ }\mathrm{g}/{\mathrm{cm}}^{2}/\mathrm{\text{decade}}$ below ${10}^{18.24\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.05}\text{ }\text{ }\mathrm{eV}$, and $(24\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}3)\text{ }\text{ }\mathrm{g}/{\mathrm{cm}}^{2}/\mathrm{\text{decade}}$ above this energy. The measured shower-to-shower fluctuations decrease from about 55 to $26\text{ }\text{ }\mathrm{g}/{\mathrm{cm}}^{2}$. The interpretation of these results in terms of the cosmic ray mass composition is briefly discussed.
Measurement of the energy spectrum of cosmic rays above 1018 eV using the Pierre Auger ObservatoryJ. Abraham, P. Abreu, M. Aglietta et al.|Physics Letters B|2010 Observation of a large-scale anisotropy in the arrival directions of cosmic rays above 8 × 10 <sup>18</sup> eVHigh-energy particles are extragalactic Cosmic rays are high-energy particles arriving from space; some have energies far beyond those that human-made particle accelerators can achieve. The sources of higher-energy cosmic rays remain under debate, although we know that lower-energy cosmic rays come from the solar wind. The Pierre Auger Collaboration reports the observation of thousands of cosmic rays with ultrahigh energies of several exa–electron volts (about a Joule per particle), arriving in a slightly dipolar distribution (see the Perspective by Gallagher and Halzen). The direction of the rays indicates that the particles originated in other galaxies and not from nearby sources within our own Milky Way Galaxy. Science , this issue p. 1266 ; see also p. 1240
Combined fit of spectrum and composition data as measured by the Pierre Auger ObservatoryA. Aab, P. Abreu, M. Aglietta et al.|Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics|2017 We present a combined fit of a simple astrophysical model of UHECR sources to both the energy spectrum and mass composition data measured by the Pierre Auger Observatory. The fit has been performed for energies above 5 10 18 eV, i.e. the region of the all-particle spectrum above the so-called "ankle" feature. The astrophysical model we adopted consists of identical sources uniformly distributed in a comoving volume, where nuclei are accelerated through a rigidity-dependent mechanism. The fit results suggest sources characterized by relatively low maximum injection energies, hard spectra and heavy chemical composition. We also show that uncertainties about physical quantities relevant to UHECR propagation and shower development have a non-negligible impact on the fit results.
Depth of maximum of air-shower profiles at the Pierre Auger Observatory. II. Composition implicationsA. Aab, P. Abreu, M. Aglietta et al.|Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D, Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology|2014 Using the data taken at the Pierre Auger Observatory between December 2004 and December 2012, we have examined the implications of the distributions of depths of atmospheric shower maximum (${X}_{\mathrm{max}}$), using a hybrid technique, for composition and hadronic interaction models. We do this by fitting the distributions with predictions from a variety of hadronic interaction models for variations in the composition of the primary cosmic rays and examining the quality of the fit. Regardless of what interaction model is assumed, we find that our data are not well described by a mix of protons and iron nuclei over most of the energy range. Acceptable fits can be obtained when intermediate masses are included, and when this is done consistent results for the proton and iron-nuclei contributions can be found using the available models. We observe a strong energy dependence of the resulting proton fractions, and find no support from any of the models for a significant contribution from iron nuclei. However, we also observe a significant disagreement between the models with respect to the relative contributions of the intermediate components.