Increase of extracellular corticotropin-releasing factor-like immunoreactivity levels in the amygdala of awake rats during restraint stress and ethanol withdrawal as measured by microdialysisPrevious research has suggested a role for corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) in the anxiogenic effects of stressful stimuli and ethanol withdrawal. This hypothesis was explored in a series of experiments using intracranial microdialysis to monitor CRF-like immunoreactivity (CRF-IR) in the extracellular compartment of the rat amygdala. The synaptic origin of CRF-IR release in the amygdala was determined in vitro by assessing the Ca2+ dependency of 4-aminopyridine stimulated CRF-IR release from tissue preparations of rat amygdala. In vivo experiments were performed in awake rats after the placement of microdialysis probes in the amygdala. In the first experiment, transient restraint stress (20 min) produced an increase of CRF-IR release (basal levels, 1.19 +/- 0.15 fmol/50 microliters; stress levels, 4.54 +/- 1.33 fmol/50 microliters; p < 0.05) that returned to basal values within 1 hr. When 4-aminopyridine (5 mM) was added to the perfusion medium, it consistently increased CRF-IR release (4.83 +/- 0.92 fmol/50 microliters, p < 0.05). In the second experiment, CRF-IR release was measured during ethanol withdrawal in rats previously maintained for 2-3 weeks on a liquid diet containing ethanol (8.5%). Basal CRF-IR levels were 2.10 +/- 0.43 fmol/50 microliters in ethanol exposed rats and 1.30 +/- 0.19 fmol/50 microliters in control rats. During withdrawal, a progressive increase of CRF-IR levels over time was observed, reaching peak values at 10-12 hr after the onset of withdrawal (10.65 +/- 0.49 fmol/50 microliters vs 1.15 +/- 0.30 fmol/50 microliters of control rats, p < 0.01).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Corticotropin-Releasing Factor Receptors and Pituitary Adrenal Responses during Immobilization StressThe regulation of pituitary and brain CRF receptors and corticotroph responses during stress were studied in rats subjected to prolonged immobilization. Plasma ACTH levels showed the characteristic biphasic changes, with a rapid 23-fold increase in 15 min, followed by a decrease to about twice the basal levels after 6-h immobilization. In contrast, plasma corticosterone levels were markedly elevated throughout the duration of the stress. Pituitary CRF receptor content, measured by binding of [125I]Tyr-ovine CRF to pituitary membrane-rich fractions, was unchanged after 2.5 h, but was reduced by 28 +/- 2.7% (+/- SE) and 47.6 +/- 1.1% after 18 and 48 h of immobilization, respectively. These results were confirmed by autoradiography in slide-mounted frozen pituitary sections. In contrast, no changes in CRF receptor content were observed in brain areas, including olfactory bulb, frontoparietal cortex, hippocampus, amygdala, and lateral septum. A concomitant decrease in immunoreactive (ir) CRF content in the median eminence of rats immobilized for 48 h is consistent with the hypothesis that increased release of CRF into the portal circulation occurs during chronic stress. Despite pituitary CRF receptor loss and reduced in vitro responses to CRF, the increases in plasma ACTH and corticosterone in vivo after ether exposure or CRF injection were greater and more prolonged in rats immobilized for 48 h than in nonimmobilized controls. The decrease in pituitary CRF receptors was accompanied by decreased CRF-stimulated cAMP and ACTH release in cultured pituitary cells from 48-h restrained rats. However, concomitant incubation of cells with CRF and vasopressin restored cAMP and ACTH responses to control levels, suggesting that the simultaneous release of both regulators from the hypothalamus determines the plasma ACTH level. These findings indicate that the decrease in plasma ACTH during the adaptation phase to stress is accompanied by decreases in pituitary CRF receptors. However, the enhanced pituitary response to a superimposed stress or CRF injection implies that the decrease in plasma ACTH levels during prolonged stress may be due to adaptive changes at the central level. These findings emphasize the importance of the integrated actions of CRF and other regulators in the control of the pituitary adrenal-axis during stress.