Leif Sparre Hermann

OBJECTIVE: To assess and compare the therapeutic efficacy and safety of metformin (M) and sulfonylurea (glyburide, G), alone and in various combinations, in patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Of 165 patients (fasting blood glucose [FBG] > or = 6.7 mmol/l) initially treated with diet alone, 144 (FBG still > or = 6.7 mmol/l) were randomized to double-blind, double-dummy controlled treatment with M, G, or primary combination therapy (MG). The dose was titrated, with FBG < 6.7 mmol/l as target, using, at most, six dose levels. The first three dose levels comprised increasing single-drug therapy (M or G) or primary combination at increasing but low dosage (MGL), and the second three levels were composed of various high-dose combinations, i.e., add-on therapy (M/G or G/M) and primary combination escalated to high dosage (MGH). Medication was maintained for 6 months after completed dose titration. RESULTS: The FBG target was achieved in 9% of patients after diet alone. Single-drug therapy was insufficient in 36% and MGL in 25% (NS) of the randomized patients. There was further improvement in glucose control by the high-dose combinations. Mean FBG +/- SE was reduced (P = 0.001) from 9.1 +/- 0.4 to 7.0 +/- 0.2 mmol/l in those maintained on single-drug treatment or low-dose primary combination. Those treated with different high-dose combinations had a large mean FBG reduction, from 13.3 +/- 0.8 to 7.8 +/- 0.6 mmol/l. HbA1c levels showed corresponding reductions, and glycemic levels rose after drug discontinuation. Fasting C-peptide rose during treatment with G and MGL but not with M, while fasting insulin was not significantly changed. Meal-stimulated C-peptide and insulin levels were unchanged by M but increased by G and, to a lesser extent, by MGL. There were no significant insulin or C-peptide differences between the different high-dose combinations (M/G, G/M, and MGH). Body weight did not change following treatment with M or combination but increased by 2.8 +/- 0.7 kg following G alone. Blood pressure was unchanged. Overall effects on plasma lipids were small, with no significant differences between groups. Drug safety was satisfactory, even if the reporting of (usually modest) adverse events was high; the profile, but not the frequency, differed between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Dose-effect titrated treatment with either metformin or glyburide promotes equal degrees of glycemic control. The former, but not the latter, is able to achieve this control without increasing body weight or hyperinsulinemia. Near-normal glycemia can be obtained by a combination of metformin and sulfonylurea, even in advanced NIDDM.

Aim To assess the vitamin B12 status of patients with type 2diabetes who had been receiving metformin treatment for at least one year. Methods Patients with type 2 diabetes attending a diabetes clinic were included in a cross-sectional cohort study. Patients exposed to metformin for more than one year (n=53) were compared with a non-exposed control group (n=31). Serum cobalamin and other variables reflecting vitamin B12 status were measured. Results Patients on metformin had lower cobalamin (289±137 vs. 395±162 pmol/L; p&lt;0.01) and holotranscobalamin (76±49 vs. 97±41 pmol/L; p&lt;0.05), and higher HCy (11.3+3.3 vs. 10.3±2.3 µmol/L; p&lt;0.05); these changes were correlated. Eight metformin patients, but no controls, had holotranscobalamin below the normal range (p&lt;0.05). Methylmalonic acid and folate were similar in both groups. Conclusion Patients exposed to long-term metformin therapy had 26.7% lower cobalamin, 21.6% lower holotranscobalamin and 9.7% higher HCy serum concentrations than control subjects. Such changes indicate a potential risk for development of vitamin B12 deficiency. Our results highlight the necessity of checking B12 status during metformin therapy.

Oral combination therapy with biguanides (metformin) and sulfonylureas is discussed. The rationale for the use of this combination is based on the different sites of action of the two kinds of drugs and the possibility for obtaining additive or potentiating effects and reduced side effects. The clinical usefulness of chlorpropamide and glyburide in combination with metformin has been demonstrated in some clinical trials. The combination may provide satisfactory glycemic control for several years, and possibly insulin therapy can be postponed or even avoided. No special safety problems are encountered with the use of the combination other than those attributed to the use of metformin or sulfonylurea alone, i.e., lactic acidosis and hypoglycemia, respectively. The lethality risks of these associated conditions are comparable. It is concluded that more data are needed to evaluate the full clinical potential and the mechanism of action of oral combination therapy.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the reversibility of the defect in glycogen synthase (GS) activity in skeletal muscle from obese patients with NIDDM treated with a hypocaloric diet and metformin. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Eighteen obese patients newly diagnosed with NIDDM were included in a randomized placebo-controlled double-blind parallel group trial and followed for 3 months. Euglycemic-hyperinsulinemic clamp including indirect calorimetry and biopsy of m. vastus lateralis was performed before and after treatment with a hypocaloric diet plus metformin or placebo. The patients were studied at basal, low, and high insulin concentrations. RESULTS: The impaired GS activity in muscle biopsies was not reversed either by acute normalization of glycemia (for 8 h) or by chronic reduction of hyperglycemia by diet plus metformin. In both treatment groups, comparable effects on glycemic control and weight loss were found together with marked insulin suppression of nonesterified fatty acids and increased glucose oxidation. Total glucose disposal at euglycemic-hyperinsulinemic clamp increased significantly in the metformin group by 25% at high insulin level (259 +/- 31 vs. 207 +/- 21 mg x m(-2) x min(-1), P < 0.05). An insignificant increase by 13% was found in the placebo group. There were no significant changes in nonoxidative glucose metabolism. GS activity and glucose utilization showed no significant differences between the two treatment groups when regression coefficients, expressed as incremental changes by increments of insulin, were compared. CONCLUSIONS: Defective GS activity in obese NIDDM patients is not secondary to hyperglycemia. Metformin and diet had no significant influence on GS activity. The added effect of metformin to that of a hypocaloric diet in improving insulin-stimulated glucose utilization is marginal when blood glucose reduction is obtained by weight loss.

The effect of epinephrine and isoproterenol in different concentrations and adrenergic blocking agents on glucose induced insulin secretion and glucose utilization was studied in isolated islets of Langerhans from mice. Epinephrine in physiological concentrations significantly inhibited the glucose induced insulin secretion. This effect was not mediated by a change in glucose utilization but involved alpha-adrenergic stimulation. Isoproterenol significantly stimulated the glucose induced insulin secretion but had no effect on glucose utilization. Beta-adrenergic stimulation by isoproterenol at low glucose concentration was not sufficient to stimulate insulin secretion. The results are discussed in relation to current therories on the mechanism of glucose induced insulin secretion.