M

M. Charles Gilbert

University of North Texas

Publishes on Geological and Geochemical Analysis, Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping, Geology and Paleoclimatology Research. 99 papers and 7k citations.

99Publications
7kTotal Citations

Is this you? Claim your profile.

Add your photo, update your bio, and get notified when your ranking changes.

Top publicationsby citations

Nomenclature of Amphiboles; Report of the Subcommittee on Amphiboles of the International Mineralogical Association Commission on New Minerals and Mineral Names
Bernard E. Leake, Alan R. Woolley, C.E.S. Arps et al.|Mineralogical Magazine|1997
Cited by 3.9k

Abstract The International Mineralogical Association's approved amphibole nomenclature has been revised in order to simplify it, make it more consistent with divisions generally at 50%, define prefixes and modifiers more precisely and include new amphibole species discovered and named since 1978, when the previous scheme was approved. The same reference axes form the basis of the new scheme and most names are little changed but compound species names like tremolitic hornblende (now magnesiohornblende) are abolished and also crossite (now glaucophane or ferroglaucophane or magnesioriebeckite or riebeckite), tirodite (now manganocummingtonite) and dannemorite (now manganogrunerite). The 50% rule has been broken only to retain tremolite and actinolite as in the 1978 scheme so the sodic calcic amphibole range has therefore been expanded. Alkali amphiboles are now sodic amphiboles. The use of hyphens is defined. New amphibole names approved since 1978 include nyböite, leakeite, kornite, ungarettiite, sadanagaite and cannilloite. All abandoned names are listed. The formulae and source of the amphibole end member names are listed and procedures outlined to calculate Fe 3+ and Fe 2+ when not determined by analysis.

Comparative Study of Low-Grade Metamorphism in the California Coast Ranges and the Outer Metamorphic Belt of Japan
E. Ernst, Yoichi Seki, Hitoshi Onuki et al.|Memoir - Geological Society of America|1970
Cited by 248

Comparative field and laboratory investigations have been undertaken of representative portions of the Franciscan and Sanbagawa blueschist terranes of the California Coast Ranges and central Shikoku, respectively. Four colored maps at various scales have resulted from this work: the Goat Mountain area at 1:10,000; the San Luis-Pacheco Pass area at about 1:18,300; and the Shirataki and Oboke Districts, both at 1:50,000. In all, modes were measured for nearly 700 thin sections of rocks from the two metamorphic belts; bulk densities for more than half of the corresponding samples were obtained. Also, selected optical and X-ray properties for some minerals from these rocks have been measured. All these data are tabulated elsewhere (Seki and others, 1969), but are summarized graphically in the present report. Chemical data listed in the present paper include 93 conventional gravimetric rock analyses, 121 "wet" chemical analyses of minerals, and 107 electron microprobe analyses of minerals.

Transcontinental Proterozoic provinces
J. Lawford Anderson, E. Erik Bender, Raymond R. Anderson et al.|Geological Society of America eBooks|1993
Cited by 146

Abstract Research on the Precambrian basement of North America over the past two decades has shown that Archean and earliest Proterozoic evolution culminated in suturing of Archean cratonic elements and pre-1.80-Ga Proterozoic terranes to form the Canadian Shield at about 1.80 Ga (Hoffman, 1988,1989a, b). We will refer to this part of Laurentia as the Hudsonian craton (Fig. 1) because it was fused together about 1.80 to 1.85 Ga during the Trans-Hudson and Penokean orogenies (Hoffman, 1988). The Hudsonian craton, including its extensions into the United States (Chapters 2 and 3, this volume), formed the foreland against which 1.8- to 1.6-Ga continental growth occurred, forming the larger Laurentia (Hoffman, 1989a, b). Geologic and geochronologic studies over the past three decades have shown that most of the Precambrian in the United States south of the Hudsonian craton and west of the Grenville province (Chapter 5) consists of a broad northeast to east-northeast-trending zone of orogenic provinces that formed between 1.8 and 1.6 Ga. This zone, including extensions into eastern Canada, comprises or hosts most rock units of this age in North America as well as extensive suites of 1.35- to 1.50-Ga granite and rhyolite. This addition to the Hudsonian Craton is referred to in this chapter as the Transcontinental Proterozoic provinces (Fig. 1); the plural form is used to denote the composite nature of this broad region. The Transcontinental Proterozoic provinces consist of many distinct lithotectonic entities that can be defined on the basis of regional lithology, regional structure, U-Pb ages from zircons, Sr-Nd-Pb isotopic signatures, and regional geophysical anomalies.