Sylvie Romain

BACKGROUND: Urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) and its inhibitor (PAI-1) play essential roles in tumor invasion and metastasis. High levels of both uPA and PAI-1 are associated with poor prognosis in breast cancer patients. To confirm the prognostic value of uPA and PAI-1 in primary breast cancer, we reanalyzed individual patient data provided by members of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer-Receptor and Biomarker Group (EORTC-RBG). METHODS: The study included 18 datasets involving 8377 breast cancer patients. During follow-up (median 79 months), 35% of the patients relapsed and 27% died. Levels of uPA and PAI-1 in tumor tissue extracts were determined by different immunoassays; values were ranked within each dataset and divided by the number of patients in that dataset to produce fractional ranks that could be compared directly across datasets. Associations of ranks of uPA and PAI-1 levels with relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed by Cox multivariable regression analysis stratified by dataset, including the following traditional prognostic variables: age, menopausal status, lymph node status, tumor size, histologic grade, and steroid hormone-receptor status. All P values were two-sided. RESULTS: Apart from lymph node status, high levels of uPA and PAI-1 were the strongest predictors of both poor RFS and poor OS in the analyses of all patients. Moreover, in both lymph node-positive and lymph node-negative patients, higher uPA and PAI-1 values were independently associated with poor RFS and poor OS. For (untreated) lymph node-negative patients in particular, uPA and PAI-1 included together showed strong prognostic ability (all P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: This pooled analysis of the EORTC-RBG datasets confirmed the strong and independent prognostic value of uPA and PAI-1 in primary breast cancer. For patients with lymph node-negative breast cancer, uPA and PAI-1 measurements in primary tumors may be especially useful for designing individualized treatment strategies.

The relationship between pregnancy and the outcome of breast cancer remains controversial. The purpose of this study was to determine the prognostic value of pregnancy at the time of diagnosis of primary infiltrating breast cancer. In a retrospective multi-center study we compared a group of 154 patients presenting pregnancy-associated (PA) breast cancer with a control group of 308 patients presenting non-pregnancy-associated (non-PA) breast cancer. Classic prognostic factors, treatment modalities, disease-free survival and overall survival were compared in the 2 groups. The relative importance of pregnancy was assessed by Cox multivariate analysis. There was a significantly higher proportion of inflammatory breast cancer, large tumors and negative receptor status in the PA group. Five-year recurrence-free survival, metastasis-free survival and overall survival were lower both in the whole PA group and in the PA sub-group excluding patients with inflammatory breast cancer than in the corresponding non-PA groups. According to clinical stage, histoprognostic grade and microscopic lymph-node involvement, probability of 5-year metastasis-free survival and overall survival was lower in the PA group. Outcome was significantly poorer after chemotherapy for patients in the PA sub-group than in the non-PA sub-group. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that pregnancy was an independent and significant prognostic factor. Pregnancy has an adverse effect on the outcome of breast cancer. Concurrent or recent pregnancy should be taken into account in the development of new systemic therapies. Our findings have important implications for further research into the basic mechanisms of cancer.

The relationship of age with prognostic factors and outcome of breast cancer has long been controversial due to numerous confounding factors. In order to clarify the prognostic value of age, we analyzed a homogeneous population of 1,266 patients treated for breast cancer at the same institution (mean follow-up: 62 months). Three groups were compared: patients under 35 years of age, non-menopausal patients over 35 years of age, and post-menopausal patients under the age of 70 years. A higher frequency of undifferentiated tumors, histoprognostic grade-3 cancer, microscopic lymph-node involvement and negative hormonal receptor status was observed in patients under 35 years. In addition, clinical but not anatomical tumor size was greater in young patients, suggesting higher stromal activity. Metastasis-free survival and overall survival were significantly poorer before 35 years. Differences were observed when patients were matched with regard to stage, anatomic size, histoprognostic grade, microscopic lymph-node involvement and receptor status. Multivariate analysis of both overall and metastasis-free survival demonstrated that age younger than 35 years was an independent risk factor. Younger women had a higher risk of local recurrence but, unlike older women, they did not experience any worsening of the already unfavorable outcome due to recurrence.

Some controversy remains about the clinical or pathological definition of the different types of inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) and especially the diagnostic and prognostic value of dermal lymphatic involvement. Our purpose was to classify the different types of IBC for which diagnosis was confirmed intraoperatively and ascertain features allowing reliable diagnosis. We studied clinical findings, biological data, and treatment outcome in a series of 144 successive patients. Our results suggest that there are 2 biologically different entities i.e., true IBC and pseudo-IBC. True IBC, whose course is currently fatal in all cases, can be divided into 2 sub-categories i.e., common true IBC (75.7% of cases), in which inflammatory signs occur primarily or secondarily, and occult true IBC (13.2% of cases). Dermal emboli have been observed in 61% of common true IBC, but their absence did not alter the rapidly unfavourable outcome. Extensive lymph-node involvement, other biological features and survival were the same in the 2 sub-categories. Pseudo-IBC (11.1% of cases) can easily be confused with common true IBC. The biological characteristics of pseudo-IBC differ from those of true IBC: no dermal lymphatic involvement and little or no lymph-node involvement. Despite large tumour size, outcome was particularly favourable. It is of great importance to differentiate true and pseudo-IBC, for which the treatments are different. Confirmation of true IBC requires pathological demonstration of dermal lymphatic emboli or extensive lymph-node involvement. Occult IBC must be identified for patients presenting rapidly growing tumours.