Carol Mason

In follow-up of 1,500 drug-using applicants to the NIMH civil commitment program under Titles I and III of the Narcotic Addict Rehabilitation Act, efforts were made to measure the reliability and validity of self-reported criminal and drug-taking behavior. Various methods to assure reliable and valid responses were developed and implemented. These methods included choice of interviewer, intraquestionnaire safeguards, interview-reinterview procedures, and use of police records and urinalysis reports. Overall, the results indicated that the responses for 829 respondents were reliable. The greatest limitation to the validity study was the incomplete and unreliable police records and urinalysis reports.

This study compared two different radiographic techniques for localization of impacted maxillary canines: vertical parallax (from a panoramic and a maxillary anterior occlusal radiograph) and magnification (from a single panoramic radiograph). The radiographs and the information regarding the impacted canines were obtained retrospectively from records of patients treated in the Day Stay Unit of the Eastman Dental Hospital. The two different radiographic techniques were tested blind and compared for localization of the impacted canine by six examiners. The 'gold standard' used for the radiographic comparisons was the true position of the canine as recorded at operation. The results showed a wide variation between the six examiners in the prediction of the canine position with the two different techniques. Localization with vertical parallax was more successful overall than with magnification, although the difference failed to reach significance. Seventy-six per cent of the impacted canines could be successfully located with vertical parallax and 66 per cent with magnification. Further analysis showed that, while almost 90 per cent of the palatally impacted canines could be correctly detected with both techniques, less than half of the buccal canines could be detected with parallax and only one in 10 buccal canines could be detected with magnification. If a canine is suspected to be buccally placed from its appearance on a panoramic film and cannot be palpated, further views are justified.

OBJECTIVES: To determine which variables were best related to the overall morbidity of a child undergoing dental general anaesthetic (GA) and then to use these variables to determine those factors that might influence the extent and severity of morbidity experienced by healthy children following dental GA. SAMPLE AND METHODS: Data were collected on anxiety, pain and morbidity, GA procedure and dental procedure from 121 children attending a day stay GA unit for dental treatment. Patients were interviewed preoperatively, postoperatively before discharge then four further times over the next 148 h. Data were analysed using multivariate regression. RESULTS: Thirty-one per cent of subjects had restorative work, 60% had at least one tooth extracted, 54% had a surgical procedure. Use of local analgesia reduced postoperative pain whilst an increase in the number of surgical procedures increased it. Increase in anaesthetic time was related to increased odds of feeling sleepy and nauseous, females were more likely to complain of sleepiness or weakness. Feelings of dizziness were increased if the patient was given local analgesia during the procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Pain following dental GA was the most prevalent and long lasting symptom of postoperative morbidity in this study. Reductions in operating time and improvement in pain control have the potential to reduce reported morbidity following dental GA.