R O Cannon

BACKGROUND: Although hormone replacement therapy has been associated with reduction of cardiovascular events in postmenopausal women, the mechanisms that mediate this apparent benefit are unclear. Because improvement in vasomotor function may represent one of the beneficial effects of estrogen administration, we investigated the acute effects of physiological levels of estrogen on the vascular responses of estrogen-deficient postmenopausal women. METHODS AND RESULTS: The study included 40 postmenopausal women 60 +/- 8 years old (mean +/- SD), 20 of whom had one or more conditions associated with vascular dysfunction (hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, diabetes, or coronary artery disease). The forearm vascular responses to the endothelium-dependent vasodilator acetylcholine were studied before and during infusion of 17 beta-estradiol into the ipsilateral brachial artery. In 31 subjects, the effect of estradiol on the responses to the endothelium-independent vasodilator sodium nitroprusside was also studied. Women with risk factors for vascular dysfunction had significantly reduced vasodilator responses to acetylcholine (P = .01) and to sodium nitroprusside (P < .001) compared with healthy subjects. Intra-arterial infusion of 17 beta-estradiol increased the forearm venous estradiol concentration from 16 +/- 10 to 318 +/- 188 pg/mL, levels typical of reproductive-age women at midcycle, but caused no vasodilation. However, estradiol potentiated the forearm vasodilation induced by acetylcholine by 18 +/- 30% (P < .001) in women with risk factors for vascular dysfunction and by 14 +/- 23% (P = .03) in healthy women. Estradiol also potentiated the forearm vasodilation induced by sodium nitroprusside in women with risk factors for vascular dysfunction by 14 +/- 21% (P < .001) but not in healthy women. CONCLUSIONS: Physiological levels of 17 beta-estradiol selectively potentiate endothelium-dependent vasodilation in healthy postmenopausal women and potentiate both endothelium-dependent and endothelium-independent vasodilation in post-menopausal women with risk factors for atherosclerosis and evidence of impaired vascular function. These vascular effects may be partly responsible for the long-term benefit of estrogen therapy on cardiovascular events in postmenopausal women.

BACKGROUND: Estrogen replacement therapy has been associated with a reduction in cardiovascular events in postmenopausal women. One of the mechanisms responsible may be a beneficial effect of estrogen on coronary vascular function. We therefore studied the short-term effects of estrogen on coronary artery dimensions and microvascular resistance in postmenopausal women. METHODS AND RESULTS: Twenty postmenopausal women 61 +/- 7 years old participated in this study. Seven had angiographic evidence of atherosclerosis of the left coronary artery. Coronary artery diameters were measured by quantitative coronary angiography. Blood flow velocity was measured with a Doppler wire placed in a proximal left coronary artery segment. Left coronary artery infusions of acetylcholine (range, 10(-8) to 10(-5) mol/L estimated delivered concentrations) and of adenosine (n = 18) and sodium nitroprusside (n = 10) were performed before and during concomitant continuous intracoronary infusion of 17 beta-estradiol to test endothelium-dependent and independent vasodilation, respectively. Intracoronary infusion of estradiol increased coronary sinus estradiol levels from postmenopausal (16 +/- 11 pg/mL) to premenopausal (282 +/- 121 pg/mL) levels. Estradiol did not affect basal coronary artery diameter, blood flow, or resistance. Epicardial coronary artery constriction induced by acetylcholine infusion in the control study (maximum, 10 +/- 15% from baseline) was prevented during repeat acetylcholine infusion with concomitant estradiol administration (P < .001). Estradiol potentiated the vasodilator coronary microvascular response to acetylcholine as manifest by significantly greater coronary flow (P < .001) and lower coronary resistance (P < .02). The reduction in coronary resistance from baseline in response to acetylcholine was significantly potentiated by estradiol (P = .01), with a mean decrease in coronary vascular resistance during acetylcholine infusion of 20 +/- 38% before and 35 +/- 33% during concomitant estradiol administration. The effect of estradiol on coronary dynamics was similar in women with and women without angiographically apparent left coronary artery atherosclerosis and was most prominent in women with the most impaired responses to acetylcholine at both the epicardial (r = -.72, P < .001) and microvascular (r = -.59, P = .006) coronary artery levels. In contrast, estradiol did not affect the coronary epicardial or microvascular vasodilator responses to adenosine or sodium nitroprusside. CONCLUSIONS: Physiological levels of 17 beta-estradiol acutely and selectively potentiate endothelium-dependent vasodilation in both large coronary conductance arteries and coronary microvasuclar resistance arteries of postmenopausal women. This effect may contribute to the reduction in cardiovascular events observed with estrogen replacement therapy.

Oxidative modification of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) may be atherogenic. We studied the time of onset of LDL oxidation (lag) in 18 postmenopausal women before and after intraarterial infusion of 17 beta-oestradiol, after 3 weeks' patch administration in 12 of these women, and 1 month after discontinuation in 10. The lag increased from baseline after acute infusion (from 134 [SD41] to 167 [36] min, p = 0.01) and after the patch (132 [31] to 178 [45] min, p = 0.009). After discontinuation of oestradiol, the lag returned to baseline. This study shows an antioxidant effect of physiological levels of 17 beta-oestradiol, which may contribute to an anti-atherogenic action.

To study the mechanism and hemodynamic significance of myocardial ischemia in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, 20 patients (nine with resting left ventricular outflow tract obstruction greater than or equal to 30 mm Hg) with a history of angina pectoris and angiographically normal coronary arteries underwent a pacing study with measurement of great cardiac vein flow, lactate and oxygen content, and left ventricular filling pressure. Compared with 28 control subjects without hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, their resting coronary blood flow was higher (91 +/- 27 vs 66 +/- 17 ml/min; p less than .001) and their coronary resistance was lower (1.13 +/- 0.38 vs 1.55 +/- 0.45 mm Hg/ml/min; p less than .001). Left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (16 +/- 6 vs 11 +/- 3 mm Hg; p less than .001) and pulmonary arterial wedge pressure (13 +/- 5 vs 7 +/- 3 mm Hg; p less than .001) were significantly higher in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. During pacing, coronary flow rose in both groups, although coronary and myocardial hemodynamics differed greatly. In contrast to the linear increase in flow in control subjects up to heart rate of 150 beats/min (66 +/- 17 to 125 +/- 28 ml/min), patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy demonstrated an initial rise in flow to 133 +/- 31 ml/min at an intermediate heart rate of 130 beats/min. At this point, 12 of 20 patients developed their typical chest pain. With continued pacing to a heart rate of 150 beats/min, mean coronary flow fell to 114 +/- 29 ml/min (p less than .002), with 18 of 20 patients experiencing their typical chest pain and metabolic evidence of myocardial ischemia. This fall in coronary flow was associated with a substantial rise in left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (30 +/- 9 mm Hg immediately after peak pacing). In the 14 patients whose coronary flow actually fell from intermediate to peak pacing, the rise in left ventricular end-diastolic pressure in the same interval was greater than that of the six patients whose flow remained unchanged or increased (11 +/- 8 vs 2 +/- 2 mm Hg; p less than .01). In addition, despite metabolic and hemodynamic evidence of myocardial ischemia, the arteriovenous O2 difference actually narrowed at peak pacing. Thus most patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy achieved maximum coronary vasodilation and flow at modest increases in heart rate. Elevation in left ventricular filling pressure, probably related to ischemia-induced changes in ventricular compliance, was associated with a decline in coronary flow.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

The bioavailability of nitric oxide (NO) in the human coronary circulation at rest and after acetylcholine (ACH)-induced vasodilation was investigated in 32 patients with angiographically normal coronary arteries. The effects of intracoronary L-NG monomethyl arginine (L-NMMA) were investigated at rest and after ACH, sodium nitroprusside, and adenosine. L-NMMA (64 mumol/min) increased resting coronary vascular resistance by 22% (P < 0.001), reduced distal epicardial coronary artery diameter by 12.6% (P < 0.001), and inhibited ACH-induced coronary epicardial and microvascular vasodilation. These effects were reversed with intracoronary L-arginine. L-NMMA did not inhibit dilation in response to sodium nitroprusside and adenosine. 23 patients were exposed to one or more coronary risk factors. The vasoconstrictor effect of L-NMMA on the epicardial and microvessels was greater in patients free of risk factors: Coronary vascular resistance was 36% higher in patients without risks, compared to 17% higher in patients with risks (P < 0.05). Both epicardial and microvascular dilator effects of ACH were greater in patients without risk factors, and the inhibition of these effects by L-NMMA was also greater in patients without risk factors. Thus: (a) NO contributes importantly to resting epicardial and coronary microvascular tone, (b) coronary vascular dilation in response to ACH is predominantly due to increased production of NO, and (c) despite the absence of angiographic evidence of atherosclerosis, exposure to coronary risk factors is associated with reduced resting and stimulated bioavailability of NO from the human coronary circulation.