Gloria Broadwater

PURPOSE: Breast cancer arising in young women is correlated with inferior survival and higher incidence of negative clinicopathologic features. The biology driving this aggressive disease has yet to be defined. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Clinically annotated, microarray data from 784 early-stage breast cancers were identified, and prospectively defined, age-specific cohorts (young: </= 45 years, n = 200; older: >/= 65 years, n = 211) were compared by prognosis, clinicopathologic variables, mRNA expression values, single-gene analysis, and gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA). Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed. RESULTS: Using clinicopathologic variables, young women illustrated lower estrogen receptor (ER) positivity (immunohistochemistry [IHC], P = .027), larger tumors (P = .012), higher human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER-2) overexpression (IHC, P = .075), lymph node positivity (P = .008), higher grade tumors (P < .0001), and trends toward inferior disease-free survival (DFS; hazard ratio = 1.32; P = .094). Using genomic expression analysis, tumors arising in young women had significantly lower ERalpha mRNA (P < .0001), ERbeta (P = .02), and progesterone receptor (PR) expression (P < .0001), but higher HER-2 (P < .0001) and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) expression (P < .0001). Exploratory analysis (GSEA) revealed 367 biologically relevant gene sets significantly distinguishing breast tumors arising in young women. Combining clinicopathologic and genomic variables among tumors arising in young women demonstrated that younger age and lower ERbeta and higher EGFR mRNA expression were significant predictors of inferior DFS. CONCLUSION: This large-scale genomic analysis illustrates that breast cancer arising in young women is a unique biologic entity driven by unifying oncogenic signaling pathways, is characterized by less hormone sensitivity and higher HER-2/EGFR expression, and warrants further study to offer this poor-prognosis group of women better preventative and therapeutic options.

BACKGROUND: The status of human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2 (HER2) in breast-cancer cells predicts clinical outcomes in women who receive adjuvant anthracycline-based chemotherapy. We hypothesized that HER2 positivity predicts a benefit from adjuvant doxorubicin doses above standard levels, from the addition of paclitaxel after adjuvant chemotherapy with doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide, or from both. METHODS: We randomly selected 1500 women from 3121 women with node-positive breast cancer who had been randomly assigned to receive doxorubicin (60, 75, or 90 mg per square meter of body-surface area) plus cyclophosphamide (600 mg per square meter) for four cycles, followed by four cycles of paclitaxel (175 mg per square meter) or observation. Tissue blocks from 1322 of these 1500 women were available. Immunohistochemical analyses of these tissue specimens for HER2 with the CB11 monoclonal antibody against HER2 or with a polyclonal-antibody assay kit and fluorescence in situ hybridization for HER2 amplification were performed. RESULTS: No interaction was observed between HER2 positivity and doxorubicin doses above 60 mg per square meter. HER2 positivity was, however, associated with a significant benefit from paclitaxel. The interaction between HER2 positivity and the addition of paclitaxel to the treatment was associated with a hazard ratio for recurrence of 0.59 (P=0.01). Patients with a HER2-positive breast cancer benefited from paclitaxel, regardless of estrogen-receptor status, but paclitaxel did not benefit patients with HER2-negative, estrogen-receptor-positive cancers. CONCLUSIONS: The expression or amplification, or both, of HER2 by a breast cancer is associated with a benefit from the addition of paclitaxel after adjuvant treatment with doxorubicin (<60 mg per square meter) plus cyclophosphamide in node-positive breast cancer, regardless of estrogen-receptor status. Patients with HER2-negative, estrogen-receptor-positive, node-positive breast cancer may gain little benefit from the administration of paclitaxel after adjuvant chemotherapy with doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide.

BACKGROUND: Increasing the dose intensity of cytotoxic therapy by shortening the intervals between cycles, or by giving individual drugs sequentially at full dose rather than in lower-dose concurrent treatment schedules, might enhance efficacy. METHODS: To clarify the relative benefits and risks of dose-intense and standard-schedule chemotherapy in early breast cancer, we did an individual patient-level meta-analysis of trials comparing 2-weekly versus standard 3-weekly schedules, and of trials comparing sequential versus concurrent administration of anthracycline and taxane chemotherapy. The primary outcomes were recurrence and breast cancer mortality. Standard intention-to-treat log-rank analyses, stratified by age, nodal status, and trial, yielded dose-intense versus standard-schedule first-event rate ratios (RRs). FINDINGS: Individual patient data were provided for 26 of 33 relevant trials identified, comprising 37 298 (93%) of 40 070 women randomised. Most women were aged younger than 70 years and had node-positive disease. Total cytotoxic drug usage was broadly comparable in the two treatment arms; colony-stimulating factor was generally used in the more dose-intense arm. Combining data from all 26 trials, fewer breast cancer recurrences were seen with dose-intense than with standard-schedule chemotherapy (10-year recurrence risk 28·0% vs 31·4%; RR 0·86, 95% CI 0·82-0·89; p<0·0001). 10-year breast cancer mortality was similarly reduced (18·9% vs 21·3%; RR 0·87, 95% CI 0·83-0·92; p<0·0001), as was all-cause mortality (22·1% vs 24·8%; RR 0·87, 95% CI 0·83-0·91; p<0·0001). Death without recurrence was, if anything, lower with dose-intense than with standard-schedule chemotherapy (10-year risk 4·1% vs 4·6%; RR 0·88, 95% CI 0·78-0·99; p=0·034). Recurrence reductions were similar in the seven trials (n=10 004) that compared 2-weekly chemotherapy with the same chemotherapy given 3-weekly (10-year risk 24·0% vs 28·3%; RR 0·83, 95% CI 0·76-0·91; p<0·0001), in the six trials (n=11 028) of sequential versus concurrent anthracycline plus taxane chemotherapy (28·1% vs 31·3%; RR 0·87, 95% CI 0·80-0·94; p=0·0006), and in the six trials (n=6532) testing both shorter intervals and sequential administration (30·4% vs 35·0%; RR 0·82, 95% CI 0·74-0·90; p<0·0001). The proportional reductions in recurrence with dose-intense chemotherapy were similar and highly significant (p<0·0001) in oestrogen receptor (ER)-positive and ER-negative disease and did not differ significantly by other patient or tumour characteristics. INTERPRETATION: Increasing the dose intensity of adjuvant chemotherapy by shortening the interval between treatment cycles, or by giving individual drugs sequentially rather than giving the same drugs concurrently, moderately reduces the 10-year risk of recurrence and death from breast cancer without increasing mortality from other causes. FUNDING: Cancer Research UK, Medical Research Council.

Preliminary studies using directed-donor ex vivo expanded human mesenchymal stem cells (hMSCs) have shown promise in the treatment of acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD). However, their production is cumbersome and standardization is difficult. We describe the first experience of using a premanufactured, universal donor, formulation of hMSCs (Prochymal) in children (n = 12; 10 boys; 9 Caucasian; age range: 0.4-15 years) with treatment-resistant grade III and IV aGVHD who received therapy on compassionate use basis between July 2005 and June 2007 at 5 transplant centers. All patients had stage III or IV gut (GI) symptoms and half had additional liver and/or skin involvement. Disease was refractory to steroids in all cases and additionally to a median of 3 other immunosuppressive therapies. The hMSCs (8 × 106cells/kg/dose in 2 patients and 2 × 106cells/kg/dose in the rest) were infused intravenously over 1 hour twice a week for 4 weeks. Partial and mixed responders received subsequent weekly therapy for 4 weeks. HLA or other matching was not needed. The hMSCs were started at a median of 98 days (range: 45-237) posttransplant. A total of 124 doses were administered, with a median of 8 doses (range: 2-21) per patient. Overall, 7 (58%) patients had complete response, 2 (17%) partial response, and 3 (25%) mixed response. Complete resolution of GI symptoms occurred in 9 (75%) patients. Two patients relapsed after initial response and showed partial response to retreatment. The cumulative incidence of survival at 100 days from the initiation of Prochymal therapy was 58%. Five of 12 patients (42%) were still alive after a median follow-up of 611 days (range: 427-1111) in surviving patients. No infusional or other identifiable acute toxicity was seen in any patient. Multiple infusions of hMSCs were well tolerated and appeared to be safe in children. Clinical responses, particularly in the GI system, were seen in the majority of children with severe refractory aGVHD. Given the favorable results observed in a patient population with an otherwise grave prognosis, we conclude that hMSCs hold potential for the treatment of aGVHD, and should be further studied in phase III trials in pediatric and adult patients. Preliminary studies using directed-donor ex vivo expanded human mesenchymal stem cells (hMSCs) have shown promise in the treatment of acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD). However, their production is cumbersome and standardization is difficult. We describe the first experience of using a premanufactured, universal donor, formulation of hMSCs (Prochymal) in children (n = 12; 10 boys; 9 Caucasian; age range: 0.4-15 years) with treatment-resistant grade III and IV aGVHD who received therapy on compassionate use basis between July 2005 and June 2007 at 5 transplant centers. All patients had stage III or IV gut (GI) symptoms and half had additional liver and/or skin involvement. Disease was refractory to steroids in all cases and additionally to a median of 3 other immunosuppressive therapies. The hMSCs (8 × 106cells/kg/dose in 2 patients and 2 × 106cells/kg/dose in the rest) were infused intravenously over 1 hour twice a week for 4 weeks. Partial and mixed responders received subsequent weekly therapy for 4 weeks. HLA or other matching was not needed. The hMSCs were started at a median of 98 days (range: 45-237) posttransplant. A total of 124 doses were administered, with a median of 8 doses (range: 2-21) per patient. Overall, 7 (58%) patients had complete response, 2 (17%) partial response, and 3 (25%) mixed response. Complete resolution of GI symptoms occurred in 9 (75%) patients. Two patients relapsed after initial response and showed partial response to retreatment. The cumulative incidence of survival at 100 days from the initiation of Prochymal therapy was 58%. Five of 12 patients (42%) were still alive after a median follow-up of 611 days (range: 427-1111) in surviving patients. No infusional or other identifiable acute toxicity was seen in any patient. Multiple infusions of hMSCs were well tolerated and appeared to be safe in children. Clinical responses, particularly in the GI system, were seen in the majority of children with severe refractory aGVHD. Given the favorable results observed in a patient population with an otherwise grave prognosis, we conclude that hMSCs hold potential for the treatment of aGVHD, and should be further studied in phase III trials in pediatric and adult patients.

BACKGROUND: Axillary lymph node dissection is commonly performed as part of the primary management of breast carcinoma. Its value in patient management, however, has recently been questioned. Few studies exist that document long term complications. METHODS: Four hundred thirty-two patients with Stage I or II breast carcinoma who were free of recurrence 2-5 years after surgery were identified. A cross-sectional survey was conducted to determine the prevalence of long term symptoms and complications as perceived by the patient, and patient and treatment factors that may have predicted complications were determined. Three hundred thirty of the 432 (76%) completed a mailed, self-administered questionnaire. In addition, the medical records of the 330 patients were reviewed. Patient and treatment factors were analyzed with logistic regression. RESULTS: Numbness was reported by 35% of patients at the time of the survey. Pain was noted in 30%, arm swelling in 15%, and limitation of arm movement in 8%. Eight percent reported episodes of infection or inflammation at some point since the diagnosis of breast carcinoma. The majority of symptoms were mild and interfered minimally with daily activities. Younger age (P=0.001) was associated with more frequent reporting of pain. Numbness was more common in younger patients (P=0.004) as well as in those with a history of smoking (P=0.012). There was a positive association of limitation of arm motion with adjuvant tamoxifen therapy (P=0.016). Arm swelling was associated with both younger age (P=0.004) and greater body surface area (P=0.008). Radiation therapy was associated with a higher frequency of infection or inflammation in the arm and/or breast (P=0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Mild symptoms, especially pain and numbness, are common 2-5 years after axillary lymph node dissection. The frequency of inflammation or infection in patients treated with radiation to the breast or chest wall after an axillary lymph node dissection may be greater than previously appreciated. Severe complications or symptoms that have a major impact on daily activities are uncommon. These findings should help health care providers and their patients with breast carcinoma weigh the pros and cons of axillary lymph node dissection.