K. D. Bagshawe

Three hundred and seventeen patients with gestational trophoblastic tumors were investigated and treated between 1957-1973. The risk of trophoblastic tumor was influenced by the outcome of the antecedent pregnancy (hydatidiform mole, non-mole abortion, term delivery) and the ABO blood groups of the mating couple; it was also influenced by the patient's age. The response to treatment with chemotherapy and , where appropriate, with surgery and radiotherapy, was influenced prfoundly by several factors. These included 1) the outcome of the antecedent pregnancy, 2) the total body burden of tumor at the time treatment stated as reflected by the urinary output of human chorionic gonadotrophin (CG), 3) the interval between the antecedent pregnancy and the start of chemotherapy, 4) the ABO groups of the mating couple, 5) the extent of mononuclear cell infiltration in the tumor, 6) the immunological status of the patient at the start of treatment, 7) the size of tumor masses, 8) the site of metastases and particularly the presence of intracranial metastases, and possibly by 9) the age and 10) the parity of the patient. A detailed study of the HLA antigens of the patient, her husband, and antecedent child has shown no positive effect on risk or prognosis. These data provide a basis for a scoring system that allows the prognosis to be defined at the time of diagnosis and facilitates tisk of drug resistance. Applied retrospectively to the cases from which the scoring system was generated, prognostic groups with survival rates ranging from 0-100% can be defined. Unfavorable prognostic factors combine so as to increase the probability of drug resistance.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the results of etoposide, methotrexate, and dactinomycin alternating with cyclophosphamide and vincristine (EMA/CO) chemotherapy in women with high-risk gestational trophoblastic tumors (GTT) and to document the middle- and long-term toxicity of the regimen. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 272 consecutive women with high-risk GTT, including 121 previously treated patients, were treated with weekly EMA/CO. The median follow-up duration is 4.5 years (range, 1 to 16). RESULTS: The cumulative 5-year survival rate is 86.2% (95% confidence interval, 81.9% to 90.5%). No deaths from GTT have occurred later than 2 years after the end [corrected] of EMA/CO. In a multivariate model, adverse prognostic factors were the presence of liver metastases (P < .0001), interval from antecedent pregnancy (P < .0001), brain metastases (P = .0008), and term delivery of antecedent pregnancy (P = .045). There were 11 (4%) early deaths, while 213 patients (78%) achieved a complete remission. Forty-seven (17%) developed drug resistance to EMA/CO, of whom 33 (70%) were salvaged by further cisplatin-based chemotherapy and surgery. Two women developed acute myeloid leukemia, two cervical malignancy, and one gastric adenocarcinoma after EMA/CO. More than half (56%) of the women who had fertility-conserving surgery and who have been in remission at least 2 years have become pregnant since the completion of EMA/CO, with 112 live births, including three infants with congenital abnormalities. CONCLUSION: EMA/CO is an effective and well-tolerated regimen for high-risk GTT. More than half of the women will retain their fertility; however, there is a small but significant risk of second malignancy.

PURPOSE: No increase in second tumor incidence was found in a previous analysis of women treated with chemotherapy for gestational trophoblastic tumors (GTT). More patient years at risk enabled a further analysis of the risk of second tumors to be performed in the 1,377 women treated in this until up to 1990. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Health questionnaires were returned on 93.3% of patients who successfully completed chemotherapy and were living in the United Kingdom. The remainder were flagged for death or developing further cancers by the Office of Population Census and Surveys and by the Thames Cancer Registry. Incidence density analysis was performed based on 15,279 person-years of observation available. Standardized incidence ratio (SIR) was used to estimate the relative risk (RR) of second tumors associated with the treatment. To calculate the expected number, the actual incidence rates observed by the Thames Cancer Registry during the same calendar period of observation were used. RESULTS: An overall 50% excess of risk (RR = 1.5; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1 to 2.1; P < .011) was observed: there were 37 second tumors, when 24.5 were expected. For specific second tumors, the risk was significantly increased for myeloid leukemia (RR = 16.6; 95% CI, 5.4 to 38.9), colon (RR = 4.6; 95% CI, 1.5 to 10.7), and breast cancer when the survival exceeded 25 years (RR = 5.8; 95% CI, 1.2 to 16.9). The risk was not significantly increased among the 554 women receiving single-agent therapy (RR = 1.3; 95% CI, 0.6 to 2.1). Leukemias only developed in patients receiving etoposide plus other cytotoxic drugs. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that there is a slight increased risk of second tumors after sequential or combination chemotherapy for GTT. This has become apparent since the introduction of etoposide and longer follow-up.