E

Erik E. Alexander

Arizona Pain Specialists

Publishes on Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment, Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research, Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research. 9 papers and 588 citations.

9Publications
588Total Citations

Is this you? Claim your profile.

Add your photo, update your bio, and get notified when your ranking changes.

Top publicationsby citations

Antioxidant enzyme expression and reactive oxygen species damage in prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia and cancer
Cited by 258Open Access

BACKGROUND: Oxidative stress results in damage to cellular structures and has been linked to many diseases, including cancer. The authors sought to determine whether the expression of three major antioxidant enzymes, copper-zinc superoxide dismutase (SOD1), manganese superoxide dismutase (SOD2), and catalase, was altered in human prostate carcinoma and its likely precursor, high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN). The level of reactive oxygen species damage was evaluated by measuring the expression of the DNA adduct 8-hydroxydeoxyguanosine. METHODS: The authors evaluated the tissue expression of the antioxidant enzymes in prostate carcinoma by immunohistochemistry, immunogold electron microscopy, and enzymatic assay. The polymerase chain reaction was used to amplify and screen tissue specimens for the genes of SOD1, SOD2, and extracellular SOD (SOD3). Matched paraffin embedded tissue sections were evaluated by RNA in situ hybridization for expression of SOD1 and immunohistochemically for the DNA adduct 8-hydroxydeoxyguanosine. RESULTS: All prostatic tissues, including cancer, displayed immunoreactivity for the three antioxidant enzymes in epithelial cells, with no staining of the stroma, inflammatory cells, or endothelial cells. The number of immunoreactive cells was greater in benign epithelium than in PIN and cancer for each enzyme. The mean percentage and intensity of immunoreactive cells was greatest for SOD2, intermediate for SOD1, and lower for catalase. Staining in cancer was heterogeneous. Immunogold ultrasound studies revealed strong mitochondrial labeling for SOD2, which was greater in benign epithelium than in cancer; SOD1 labeling was invariably weaker, with nuclear labeling in benign epithelium and cytoplasmic labeling in cancer cells. There was no difference in enzyme activity for the three antioxidant enzymes between benign epithelium and cancer. No mutations were found in the 5 exons of SOD1, 5 exons of SOD2, and 3 exons of SOD3, except for 3 of 20 cases with polymorphisms for exon 3 of SOD1. Intense nuclear immunoreactivity for 8-hydroxydeoxyguanosine was present in fewer than 3% of epithelial cells, with no apparent differences among benign epithelium, PIN, and cancer. CONCLUSIONS: SOD1, SOD2, and catalase had lower expression in PIN and prostate carcinoma than in benign epithelium. The number of immunoreactive cells in PIN was similar to cancer, indicating that these are closely related. Enzyme activities were variable, with no difference between benign epithelial cells and cancer, although this lack of change in enzyme activity could have been due to the presence of contaminating benign cells within the cancer specimens. The results of reactive oxygen species damage were found only in the epithelium and not in the stroma. Expression of the DNA adduct 8-hydroxydeoxyguanosine was present in fewer than 3% of cells, with no apparent differences among benign epithelium, PIN, and cancer. These findings suggest that oxidative stress is an early event in carcinogenesis.

BENEFIT OF ADJUVANT RADIATION THERAPY FOR LOCALIZED PROSTATE CANCER WITH A POSITIVE SURGICAL MARGIN
Bradley C. Leibovich, Donald E. Engen, David E. Patterson et al.|The Journal of Urology|2000
Cited by 115

PURPOSE: Positive surgical margins are common after radical prostatectomy, and the role of adjuvant therapy in such cases is controversial. We determined the benefit of postoperative external beam radiation therapy in patients with margin positive prostate cancer with respect to biochemical progression or cancer recurrence. To decrease confounding factors that may affect the likelihood of biochemical progression our study was limited to men with organ confined cancer and a single positive margin. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated the records of a nested matched cohort of 76 patients with pathological stage T2N0 prostate cancer and a single positive margin who underwent adjuvant radiation therapy within 3 months of radical prostatectomy. There was a positive margin at the prostatic apex in 35 cases, prostatic base in 18, posterior prostate in 11, urethra in 7, and prostatic apex and urethra in 5. These patients were matched 1:1 with 76 controls who did not receive adjuvant radiation therapy. Neither group received androgen deprivation therapy. Patients and controls were matched exactly for the margin positive site, age at surgery, preoperative serum prostate specific antigen, Gleason score and DNA ploidy. Biochemical relapse was defined as posttreatment PSA greater than 0.2 ng./ml. RESULTS: Overall there was significant estimated improvement plus or minus standard error in 5-year clinical and biochemical progression-free survival in 88%+/-5% versus 59%+/-11% of patients treated with adjuvant radiation therapy versus no radiation therapy (p = 0.005). No patient who received radiation therapy had local or distant recurrence, while 16% of controls had recurrence (p = 0.015). When stratified by site of margin positivity, the 5-year estimated clinical and biochemical progression-free rate in 18 cases and controls with a positive base margin was 95%+/-15% and 65%+/-13%, respectively (p = 0.02). The rate in 35 cases and cases with a positive apex margin was 95%+/-5% and 64%+/-15%, respectively (p = 0.07). Limited sample size precluded analysis of the other sites. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with localized prostate cancer and a singe positive surgical margin appear to have a lower rate of biochemical relapse at 5 years when adjuvant radiation therapy is administered. Definitive evidence of the beneficial effect of adjuvant radiation therapy for patients with involved surgical margins awaits conclusion of randomized clinical trials.

Procedural techniques and multicenter postmarket experience using minimally invasive convective radiofrequency thermal therapy with Rezūm system for treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostatic hyperplasia
Micheal F. Darson, Erik E. Alexander, Zvi Schiffman et al.|Research and Reports in Urology|2017
Cited by 98Open Access

OBJECTIVE: This report evaluates clinical experience with the Rezūm system after US Food and Drug Administration clearance in consecutive cases accrued by multiple community urologists for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Treatment techniques for transurethral convective radiofrequency water-vapor thermal therapy and outcomes with up to 12 months' follow-up are presented. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 131 patients with moderate-severe LUTS were included in a retrospective analysis of BPH procedures with the Rezūm system. Pre- and postprocedure assessments included International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), quality of life, peak urinary flow rate, voided volume, and postvoid residual urine volume. Urologists used their own discretion for patient selection, with variable prostate sizes, LUTS severity, urinary retention, or presence of an obstructing median lobe. Safety signals and surgical retreatment rates were monitored prospectively. RESULTS: showed significant improvement in IPSS, quality of life, and postvoid residual volume durable through 12 months after thermal therapy. Patients with either moderate (IPSS 8-19) or severe (IPSS 20-35) symptoms achieved significantly improved scores. Postprocedure adverse events normally anticipated and related to endoscopic instrumentation were transient and mild-moderate in nature. No de novo erectile or ejaculatory dysfunction was reported. CONCLUSION: This study corroborates prior published pilot and randomized controlled trial results indicating significant relief of urinary symptoms and reproducibility of responses to thermal therapy. Convective radiofrequency thermal therapy with the Rezūm system warrants consideration as a first-line treatment for LUTS/BPH as an alternative to the use of pharmaceutical agents.

Antioxidant enzyme expression and reactive oxygen species damage in prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia and cancer
Cited by 23

BACKGROUND Oxidative stress results in damage to cellular structures and has been linked to many diseases, including cancer. The authors sought to determine whether the expression of three major antioxidant enzymes, copper-zinc superoxide dismutase (SOD1), manganese superoxide dismutase (SOD2), and catalase, was altered in human prostate carcinoma and its likely precursor, high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN). The level of reactive oxygen species damage was evaluated by measuring the expression of the DNA adduct 8-hydroxydeoxyguanosine. METHODS The authors evaluated the tissue expression of the antioxidant enzymes in prostate carcinoma by immunohistochemistry, immunogold electron microscopy, and enzymatic assay. The polymerase chain reaction was used to amplify and screen tissue specimens for the genes of SOD1, SOD2, and extracellular SOD (SOD3). Matched paraffin embedded tissue sections were evaluated by RNA in situ hybridization for expression of SOD1 and immunohistochemically for the DNA adduct 8-hydroxydeoxyguanosine. RESULTS All prostatic tissues, including cancer, displayed immunoreactivity for the three antioxidant enzymes in epithelial cells, with no staining of the stroma, inflammatory cells, or endothelial cells. The number of immunoreactive cells was greater in benign epithelium than in PIN and cancer for each enzyme. The mean percentage and intensity of immunoreactive cells was greatest for SOD2, intermediate for SOD1, and lower for catalase. Staining in cancer was heterogeneous. Immunogold ultrasound studies revealed strong mitochondrial labeling for SOD2, which was greater in benign epithelium than in cancer; SOD1 labeling was invariably weaker, with nuclear labeling in benign epithelium and cytoplasmic labeling in cancer cells. There was no difference in enzyme activity for the three antioxidant enzymes between benign epithelium and cancer. No mutations were found in the 5 exons of SOD1, 5 exons of SOD2, and 3 exons of SOD3, except for 3 of 20 cases with polymorphisms for exon 3 of SOD1. Intense nuclear immunoreactivity for 8-hydroxydeoxyguanosine was present in fewer than 3% of epithelial cells, with no apparent differences among benign epithelium, PIN, and cancer. CONCLUSIONS SOD1, SOD2, and catalase had lower expression in PIN and prostate carcinoma than in benign epithelium. The number of immunoreactive cells in PIN was similar to cancer, indicating that these are closely related. Enzyme activities were variable, with no difference between benign epithelial cells and cancer, although this lack of change in enzyme activity could have been due to the presence of contaminating benign cells within the cancer specimens. The results of reactive oxygen species damage were found only in the epithelium and not in the stroma. Expression of the DNA adduct 8-hydroxydeoxyguanosine was present in fewer than 3% of cells, with no apparent differences among benign epithelium, PIN, and cancer. These findings suggest that oxidative stress is an early event in carcinogenesis. Cancer 2000;89:123–34. © 2000 American Cancer Society.