Zsolt Hodi

PURPOSE: The three strongest prognostic determinants in operable breast cancer used in routine clinical practice are lymph node (LN) stage, primary tumor size, and histologic grade. However, grade is not included in the recent revision of the TNM staging system of breast cancer as its value is questioned in certain settings. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study is based on a large and well-characterized consecutive series of operable breast cancer (2,219 cases), treated according to standard protocols in a single institution, with a long-term follow-up (median, 111 months) to assess the prognostic value of routine assessment of histologic grade using Nottingham histologic grading system. RESULTS: Histologic grade is strongly associated with both breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) and disease-free survival (DFS) in the whole series as well as in different subgroups based on tumor size (pT1a, pT1b, pT1c, and pT2) and LN stages (pN0 and pN1 and pN2). Differences in survival were also noted between different individual grades (1, 2, and 3). Multivariate analyses showed that histologic grade is an independent predictor of both BCSS and DFS in operable breast cancer as a whole as well as in all studied subgroups. CONCLUSION: Histologic grade, as assessed by the Nottingham grading system, provides a strong predictor of outcome in patients with invasive breast cancer and should be incorporated in breast cancer staging systems.

This study was undertaken to determine the morphologic features and frequency of putative precursor lesions involved in the development of some pure forms of special types and low grade breast carcinoma. We reviewed 147 successive tumor cases, comprising tubular carcinoma (TC); pure type (n=56) and mixed type (n=20), invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC); classic type (n=57), and tubulolobular carcinoma (TLC; n=14). The presence of preinvasive lesions including columnar cell lesions (CCLs), usual epithelial hyperplasia, ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), and lobular neoplasia (LN) was determined. Estrogen receptor and E-cadherin immunohistochemistry was performed. Ninety-five percent (95%) of pure TCs had associated CCLs with the majority showing flat epithelial atypia. Atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH)/DCIS was present in 89% patients. Colocalization of CCL, ADH/DCIS, and TC was seen in 85% patients, all displaying the same cytologic-nuclear morphology in most cases. LN was seen in 16%. In ILC, 91% cases showed LN. CCL and ADH/DCIS were seen in 60% and 42% cases, respectively. E-cadherin was positive in TLC but reduced in TC and completely absent in ILC. In conclusion, our findings support the hypothesis that CCLs are associated with pure and mixed forms of TC, and that LN is involved in ILC development. Our observations suggest that these lesions represent family members of low grade precursor, in situ and invasive neoplastic lesions of the breast. Molecular studies are being performed to substantiate the hypothesis that tubular and lobular carcinomas have direct evolutionary links to CCLs and flat epithelial atypia.

BACKGROUND: Although lymphovascular invasion (LVI) has been associated with a poor outcome in patients with breast cancer, it is not included in most internationally recognized staging systems, including the American Joint Committee on Cancer tumor, lymph node, metastasis (TNM) classification. This is mainly because it remains unclear whether the presence of LVI is an independent, high-risk criterion in clinically relevant staging subgroups. METHODS: The current study was based on a large and well characterized consecutive series of patients who had operable (pathologic T1 [pT1]-pT2, pathologic N0 [pN0]-pN3, M0) breast cancer (3812 informative cases) who were treated according to standard protocols at a single institution and who had long-term follow-up to assess the prognostic value of definite LVI in clinically and molecularly relevant staging subgroups. RESULTS: LVI was strongly associated with both breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) in the entire series and in different subgroups. Multivariate analyses identified LVI as an independent predictor of both BCSS and DMFS in patients with operable breast cancer overall; in the TNM clinical subgroups pT1a-pT1c/pN0 and pT2/pN0; and in the molecular classes estrogen receptor (ER)-positive, ER-negative, human epidermal growth factor 2 [HER2]-negative, and triple-negative. In patients who had lymph node-negative tumors, LVI could be used as a high-risk criterion providing survival disadvantage equivalent to that provided by 1 or 2 involved lymph nodes (pN0 to pN1) and to that provided by 1 size category (pT1 to pT2). The use of immunohistochemistry for detecting an endothelial-specific marker contributed to the prognostic significance of LVI when applied to routine LVI negative/possible cases. CONCLUSIONS: LVI provided a strong predictor of outcome in patients with invasive breast cancer and should be incorporated into breast cancer staging systems.

We have previously provided evidence showing an association between some precursor lesions with low nuclear grade breast carcinomas (LNGBCs). In this study, further immunophenotypic support to our proposed route of pathogenesis of LNGBC and their precursor lesions was provided. Precursor lesions including columnar cell lesions, atypical ductal hyperplasia, ductal carcinoma in situ, usual epithelial hyperplasia, and lobular neoplasia were compared with matching "morphologically normal" terminal lobular duct units and matching invasive carcinoma. The epithelial cells in the putative precursor flat epithelial atypia, atypical ductal hyperplasia, lobular neoplasia, ductal carcinoma in situ lesions, and their coexisting LNGBC were negative for basal and myoepithelial markers, but positive for CK19/18/8, estrogen receptor (ER)-alpha, Bcl-2, and cyclin D1. The ER-alpha/ER-beta expression ratio increased during carcinogenesis, as did expression of cyclin D1 and Bcl-2. p53 immunopositivity was found 3% in LNGBC versus 43% in high nuclear grade breast carcinoma (HNGBC), whereas ataxia telangiectasia mutated expression was absent or reduced in 22% of LNGBC versus 53% of HNGBC cases. In summary, our findings support the concept that flat epithelial atypia is the earliest morphologically identifiable nonobligate precursor lesion of LNGBC. These may represent a family of precursor, in situ and invasive neoplastic lesions belonging to the luminal "A" subclass of breast cancer. The balance between ER-alpha and ER-beta expression may be important in driving cyclin D-1 and Bcl-2 expression. Ataxia telangiectasia mutated may be one of the alternative regulatory mechanisms to TP53 mutation or dysfunction in low-grade and high-grade breast carcinoma. Our findings support the concept that progression of LNGBC to HNGBC (basal-like or HER2+) phenotype is an unlikely biologic phenomenon.

PURPOSE Although tubular carcinoma (TC) is known to have a favorable prognosis, it is still unknown whether this subtype represents a distinct type of breast carcinoma or whether it behaves like other low-grade luminal A-type breast carcinomas. METHODS In this study, we performed a retrospective analysis of a large well-characterized series of breast cancers (2,608 carcinomas) to assess the clinicopathologic and molecular features and prognostic value of TC compared with grade 1 ductal carcinomas of the breast. Results When compared with grade 1 ductal carcinoma (n = 212), TC (n = 102) was more likely to be detected on mammographic screening, had smaller median size, and less frequently showed lymphovascular invasion. Compared with grade 1 ductal carcinoma, TC was associated with longer disease-free survival (chi(2) = 13.25, P < .001) and breast cancer-specific survival (chi(2) = 8.8, P = .003). In this study, none of the patients with TC developed distant metastasis or died from the disease without an intervening recurrence as invasive carcinoma of different histologic type. CONCLUSION We conclude that the biologic behavior of TC is excellent and is more favorable than that of grade 1 ductal carcinoma. Patients with TC may be at risk of developing second primary carcinomas in the contralateral breast, which may be of higher grade and poorer potential prognostic outcome. In addition, patients with TC seem to have a close to normal life expectancy, and as a consequence, adjuvant systemic therapy may not be justified in their routine management.