Urmila Nair

Tobacco use is causally associated with cancers of the lung, larynx, mouth, esophagus, kidneys, urinary tract, and possibly, breast. Major classes of carcinogens present in tobacco and tobacco smoke are converted into DNA-reactive metabolites by cytochrome P450 (CYP)-related enzymes, several of which display genetic polymorphism. Individual susceptibility to cancer is likely to be modified by the genotype for enzymes involved in the activation or detoxification of carcinogens in tobacco and repair of DNA damage. We summarize here the results of case-control studies published since 1990 on the effects of genetic variants of CYP1A1, 1A2, 1B1, 2A6, 2D6, 2E1, 2C9, 2C19, 17, and 19 alone or in combination with detoxifying enzymes as modifiers of the risk for tobacco-related cancers. The results of studies on gene-gene interactions and the dependence of smoking-related DNA adducts on genotype were also analyzed. Some CYP variants were associated with increased risks for cancers of the lung, esophagus, and head and neck. The risk was often increased in individuals who also had GSTM1 deficiency. For breast cancer in women, a few studies suggested an association with CYPs related to metabolism of tobacco carcinogens and steroidal hormones. The overall effects of common CYP polymorphisms were found to be moderate in terms of penetrance and relative risk, with odds ratios ranging from 2 to 10. Some CYP1A1/GSTM1 0/0 genotype combinations seem to predispose the lung, esophagus, and oral cavity of smokers to an even higher risk for cancer or DNA damage, requiring, however, confirmation. Future strategies in molecular cancer epidemiology for identifying such susceptible individuals are discussed with emphasis on well-designed larger studies.

Oral cancer is the most common cancer in males and third most common in females in India, the main causative agent being the use of chewing tobacco with or without betel quid (BQ). However, nothing is known about the role of the host metabolic genes in oral cancer in ethnic Indian population. In this study, the prevalence of GSTM1 and GSTT1 null genotypes (GSTM1*2 and GSTT1*2) in oral premalignant leukoplakia cases and controls was ascertained in genomic DNA by a multiplex PCR technique. Biopsies taken from 98 oral leukoplakia patients and exfoliated cells from 82 healthy controls both of Indian ethnicity were analysed. GSTM1*1 (active) was present in 83% and GSTT1*1 (active) was present in 78% of all control subjects, while prevalence of GSTM1*2 and GSTT1*2 null genotypes was significantly higher among oral leukoplakia cases. The prevalence of GSTM1*2 in leukoplakia cases was 81.6% compared with 17% in controls [odds ratio (OR), 22; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1047] and GSTT1*2 was 75.5% in the cases versus 22% in controls (OR, 11; 95% CI, 5-22). Combined null genotypes of GSTM1 and GSTT1 prevailed in 60.2% of the cases with none detected in controls. Glutathione S-transferase M1 and T1 enzymes are both known to catalyse detoxification of reactive oxygen species, lipid peroxidation products and tobacco-derived carcinogens that have been found in the saliva of BQ/tobacco chewers. Our results, still requiring confirmation by a larger study, demonstrate that the null genotypes of both GSTM1 and GSTT1 increase with high penetrance, separately or in combination, the risk for developing leukoplakia in an Indian ethnic population.

Preventive strategies require identification of cancer-susceptible individuals resulting from combinations of carcinogen exposure, cancer-predisposing genes, and lack of protective factors. To this aim, related to tobacco smoking and chewing (betel quid), we measured PAH-DNA adducts as exposure and susceptibility markers together with genetic polymorphism in drug-metabolizing enzymes related to CYP1A1, GSTM1, and GSTT1 genes in case-control studies. (+)-anti-Benzo(a)pyrene diol-epoxide (BPDE)-DNA adduct levels were quantitated in white blood cells (WBCs) and lung tissue DNA. CYP1A1 polymorphism and GSTM1 or GSTT1 gene deletion was analyzed in genomic DNA from lung parenchyma, WBCs, or oral biopsies (leukoplakia patients from India) and from oral exfoliated cells (healthy controls). Results from lung cancer patients and PAH-exposed coke oven workers correlated CYP1A1-GSTM1 genotype combinations with BPDE-DNA adduct levels. Smokers with homozygous CYP1A1 variant and GSTM1 null had the highest adduct levels and were, as shown in Japanese smokers, most susceptible to lung cancer. In oral premalignant leukoplakia cases associated with betel quid/tobacco chewing, the prevalence of the GSTM1 null and GSTT1 null genotypes was significantly higher, as compared to healthy controls. The combined GST null genotypes prevailed in 60% of the cases with none detected in controls. Based on this short review we conclude that (i) BPDE-DNA adduct levels resulting from "at risk" genotype combinations may serve as markers to identify most susceptible individuals; (ii) in Indian betel quid/tobacco chewers, the null genotypes of GSTM1 and GSTT1 greatly increased the risk for developing oral leukoplakia.