Treatment of Aplastic Anemia with Antilymphocyte Globulin and Methylprednisolone with or without CyclosporineBACKGROUND AND METHODS: Immunosuppression is the most effective treatment for patients with aplastic anemia, except for bone marrow transplantation. The best results are achieved with antilymphocyte globulin or cyclosporine. Patients have been treated successfully with a combination of both agents, but there has been no controlled evaluation of its efficacy. We conducted a randomized, multicenter trial in 84 patients not eligible for bone marrow transplantation, comparing treatment with antilymphocyte globulin and methylprednisolone (41 patients--the control group) with antilymphocyte globulin, methylprednisolone, and cyclosporine (43 patients--the cyclosporine group). RESULTS: At three months significantly more patients in the cyclosporine group had a complete or partial remission in response to treatment than did patients in the control group (65 percent vs. 39 percent, P less than 0.03); this difference was confirmed at six months (70 percent vs. 46 percent, P less than 0.05). The superior results of the regimen including cyclosporine were most evident in the patients with severe or very severe aplastic anemia, whose response rate at six months was 65 percent, as compared with 31 percent of such patients in the control group (P less than 0.02). Granulocyte and hemoglobin levels became normal in most patients who responded, but platelet counts continued to be subnormal in 61 percent of the patients. Ten of 52 patients with responses (3 in the cyclosporine group and 7 in the control group) relapsed 4 to 37 months after treatment. The actuarial survival of all patients at 41 months is 64 percent in the cyclosporine group and 58 percent in the control group (P = 0.16); among the patients with severe or very severe disease, survival is 80 percent and 44 percent, respectively (P = 0.077). Cyclosporine had substantial but reversible side effects. CONCLUSIONS: Immunosuppressive treatment of aplastic anemia with antilymphocyte globulin, methylprednisolone, and cyclosporine appears to be more effective than a regimen of antilymphocyte globulin and methylprednisolone without cyclosporine and may thus represent a treatment of choice for patients who are not eligible for bone marrow transplantation.
Improvement of Overall Survival in Advanced Stage Mantle Cell LymphomaA. Herrmann, Eva Hoster, Thomas Zwingers et al.|Journal of Clinical Oncology|2008 PURPOSE: Mantle cell lymphomas (MCLs) represent a clinically aggressive lymphoma subtype with a poor prognosis. To explore a potential progress in outcome a historical comparison was performed using data from the Kiel Lymphoma Study Group (KLSG; 1975 to 1986) and the German Low Grade Lymphoma Study Group (GLSG; 1996 to 2004). PATIENTS AND METHODS: All patients with the histologically confirmed diagnosis of advanced-stage nonblastoid MCL were eligible. To minimize the potential heterogeneity of different risk profiles frequency matching was pursued. In addition, we adjusted for potential confounding variables by multiple Cox regression. RESULTS: A total of 520 patients were assessable, 150 from KLSG and 370 from GLSG studies. The median overall survival was 2.7 years for KLSG patients as compared with 4.8 years for GLSG patients (P < .0001). The 5-year survival rates were 22% in the KLSG group (95% CI, 13% to 31%) as compared with 47% for GLSG treated patients (95% CI, 38% to 55%). The hazard ratio adjusted for performance status, lactate dehydrogenase, and age was 0.44 for GLSG patients (95% CI, 0.32 to 0.59). CONCLUSION: Median overall survival of patients with advanced nonblastoid MCL almost doubled during the past 30 years. Potential reasons for this apparent improvement in overall survival include the application of anthracycline-containing regimens and new approaches, such as antilymphoma antibodies or stem cell transplantation. Advances in general supportive care, new diagnostic tools, and general improvement of life span might have also reinforced this effect. However, our results are questioning the validity of historical comparisons which had been frequently applied in previous trials.
Clinical and prognostic relevance of the Kiel classification of non‐Hodgkin lymphomas results of a prospective multicenter study by the Kiel Lymphoma Study GroupG. Brittinger, H. Bartels, Harold Common et al.|Hematological Oncology|1984 Clinical and prognostic relevance of the Kiel classification of non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHL) was investigated in 1127 patients entering a prospective multicenter observation study. Survival of the 782 (69.4 per cent) patients with low-grade malignant NHL (lymphocytic lymphomas, predominantly B-CLL, LP immunocytoma, centrocytic lymphoma, centroblastic-centrocytic lymphoma) exceeded that of the 341 patients (30.2 per cent) with high-grade malignant NHL (centroblastic, immunoblastic, lymphoblastic lymphomas). Prognosis was best in centroblastic-centrocytic lymphoma and in B-CLL and least favorable in immunoblastic and lymphoblastic lymphomas. Survival of LP immunocytoma and centrocytic lymphoma patients was intermediate after 2 to 2.5 years of follow-up. Corresponding to histopathology, pattern of survival curves of low-grade malignant NHL (slow decline, no plateauing) differed from that of high-grade malignant NHL (rapid decline, subsequent plateauing). Prognosis of B-CLL was superior to that of LP immunocytoma. Stages I and II were more frequent in centroblastic-centrocytic lymphoma (21 per cent) than in LP immunocytoma (2.5 per cent) and centrocytic lymphoma (11 per cent). Ability of radiotherapy to induce stable complete remissions in stage III of centroblastic-centrocytic lymphoma indicates prolonged restriction of lymphoma to the lymphatic system. In immunoblastic and centroblastic lymphomas, stages I and II were diagnosed in 34 and 38 per cent of cases, respectively, but only in stage I/IE of centroblastic lymphoma prolonged remissions were achieved by radiotherapy. In advanced high-grade malignant NHL marked improvement of prognosis was solely possible by induction of complete remissions whereas in corresponding low-grade malignant lymphomas also partial remissions were prognostically relevant.
Multicentre randomized therapeutic trial for advanced centrocytic lymphoma: Anthracycline does not improve the prognosisP. Meusers, M. Engelhard, H. Bartels et al.|Hematological Oncology|1989 Within a multicentre observation study on non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHL) diagnosed according to the Kiel classification advanced stages III and IV of centrocytic (CC) lymphoma exhibited the worst prognosis among lymphomas of low-grade malignancy with a 5-year survival probability of less than 10 per cent. Treatment had been solely expectative and palliative with treatment results showing a prognostic superiority of patients achieving partial and complete remissions over non-responders. Therefore, a randomized multicentre study was initiated to compare the remission-inducing potential of the COP regimen (Bagley et al., 1972) with that of the more intensive adriamycin-containing CHOP regimen (McKelvey et al., 1976). From 91 newly diagnosed CC lymphomas 63 fulfilled randomization criteria with 37 patients assigned to the COP regimen and 26 patients to the CHOP regimen. Between the COP- and CHOP-treated patients no significant differences could be demonstrated with respect to initial clinical parameters, rate of complete (41 per cent versus 58 per cent) or partial remissions (43 per cent versus 31 per cent), median overall survival probability (32 versus 37 months), relapse-free survival (10 versus 7 months) and rates of relapse (73 per cent versus 67 per cent) and death (57 per cent versus 50 per cent). It can be concluded that CC lymphoma is a typical lymphoma of low-grade malignancy with its inability to reach stable remissions while the demonstration of identical survival probabilities for patients with complete and partial remissions constitutes a unique feature of this lymphoma entity. These observations prove advanced CC lymphoma to represent an incurable neoplastic disease under conventional therapeutic approaches.
Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III study of recombinant human granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor as adjunct to induction treatment of high-grade malignant non-Hodgkin's lymphomas [see comments]We evaluated recombinant human granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (rhGM-CSF; Sandoz Pharma [Basel, Switzerland]/Schering-Plough [Kenilworth, NJ]) as an adjunct to a modified (mainly cyclophosphamide and doxorubicin increased 1.5-fold) COP-BLAM regimen in the primary treatment of high-grade malignant non-Hodgkin's lymphomas (NHL). Patients (n = 182; stage II-IV; age, 15 to 73 years) were randomized to rhGM-CSF (400 micrograms) or placebo for 7 days subcutaneously after chemotherapy. Efficacy was analyzed for patients receiving at least 70% of study medication (n = 125). The frequency of clinically relevant infection was reduced by rhGM-CSF (28 v 69 infections, 16 v 30 patients, P = .02) with a cumulative probability of remaining infection free in 70% versus 48% (P = .05 log rank test at 190 days). Periods of neutropenia (P = .01 in 5 of 6 courses), days with fever (2.1 v 4.0, P = .04) and days of hospitalization for infection (3.5 v 8.0 days, P = .01) were significantly reduced. Complete response (CR) rates, assessed by prognostic risk, were 15 of 19 (79%) in treated versus 20 of 21 (95%) in controls in the low-risk group (P = .12). In the high-risk group, 31 of 45 (69%) treated patients achieved CR versus 25 of 52 (48%) of controls (P = .04). No difference in survival has been seen after 1 year. Only injection site reactions (45% treated v 7% controls) and rash (26% v 2%) occurred more frequently in treated patients (n = 176). These data show that rhGM-CSF is well tolerated in most patients with NHL, significantly reduces infection, and improves response.