A randomized study of high-dose cytarabine in induction in acute myeloid leukemia [see comments]High-dose cytarabine (ara-c) may overcome cytarabine resistance in leukemic blasts. It has been used as a successful salvage and in postremission therapy but not as initial induction treatment. Patients aged 15 to 60 years, presenting with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) were randomized to receive either high-dose cytarabine, 3 g/m2 12 hourly on days 1, 3, 5, and 7 for 8 doses, daunorubicin 50 mg/m2 days 1 to 3, etoposide 75 mg/m2 days 1 to 7, (HIDAC-3-7) or standard dose cytarabine 100 mg/m2 continuous intravenous infusion for 7 days with daunorubicin and etoposide at the same dose and schedule as above (7-3-7). Patients could receive a second or third induction course if complete remission (CR) was not achieved. All patients received the same postinduction consolidation therapy (5-2-5) for 2 courses. Eligible patients had no prior chemotherapy or myelodysplastic disease. Patients have been followed for a median of 4.5 years. Of 301 patients treated, complete response (CR) was achieved in 71% with HIDAC-3-7 and 74% with 7-3-7. For patients in CR, the estimated median remission duration was 45 months with HIDAC-3-7 and 12 months with 7-3-7 (P = .0005 univariate analysis, P = .0004 multivariate analysis). The estimated percentage of patients relapse free 5 years after achieving a CR was 49% on HIDAC-3-7 and 24% on 7-3-7. Patients in CR tended to survive longer with HIDAC-3-7 but there were no overall survival differences between the two arms. HIDAC-3-7 was associated with significantly more toxicity in induction with more leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, nausea, and vomiting and eye toxicity (all P < .001) but a similar incidence of severe central nervous system and cerebellar toxicity compared to 7-3-7. The consolidation treatment was the same in both arms but caused significantly more leukopenia and thrombocytopenia in patients previously treated with HIDAC-3-7 induction (P < .0001). We conclude that a dose-effect exists for cytarabine in AML and that HIDAC-3-7 prolongs remission duration and disease-free survival and is tolerable when used as initial induction therapy in patients with de novo AML.
Etoposide in acute nonlymphocytic leukemia. Australian Leukemia Study GroupPreviously untreated patients with acute nonlymphocytic leukemia (ANLL) aged 15 to 70 years were randomized to either cytosine arabinoside 100 mg/m2/d continuous intravenous (IV) infusion days 1 through 7, daunorubicin 50 mg/m2/d IV days 1 through 3 (7-3), or the same drugs intensified with etoposide 75 mg/m2/d IV days 1 through 7 (7-3-7) as induction therapy. Patients achieving complete remission (CR) received two courses of consolidation therapy (5-2 or 5-2-5) followed by maintenance therapy. Of 264 eligible patients, CR occurred in 56% of 7-3 and 59% of 7-3-7 patients; 7-3-7 significantly improved remission duration (P = .01). The median remission duration was 12 months for 7-3 and 18 months for 7-3-7. Survival was similar when the two arms were compared overall. Subset analysis performed to identify patients with the most benefit showed that etoposide significantly prolonged remission duration in younger patients (less than 55 years) with a median of 12 months for 7-3 and 27 months for 7-3-7 (P = .01). Survival appeared to be prolonged with 7-3-7 in patients aged less than 55 years, with a median of 9 months for 7-3 as compared with 17 months for 7-3-7 (P = .03). In older patients (aged greater than or equal to 55 years), 7-3-7 was more toxic, with significantly more severe [World Health Organization (WHO) grade 3 or 4] stomatitis (P = .02) and no additional clinical benefit. Hematologic toxicity for induction courses was similar, with granulocytopenia less than 0.5 x 10(9)/L for a median of 16 days per course for 7-3 and 15 days for 7-3-7. Hematologic toxicity was more severe for 5-2-5 consolidation courses (P = .003). Induction and consolidation therapy intensified with etoposide resulted in significantly improved remission duration but not survival.
Clinical factors influencing the efficacy of pooled platelet transfusionsTo determine the relative importance of clinical factors on the efficacy of platelet transfusions, 941 pooled platelet transfusions from HLA-unmatched donors were studied prospectively in 133 patients with bone marrow failure. Multiple linear regression analyses identified the major factors influencing one-hour-corrected increments (CI) as prior splenectomy, bone marrow transplantation, disseminated intravascular coagulation, concurrent intravenous amphotericin B, splenomegaly, and HLA antibody grade. The relative impact of these factors on CI has been quantitated by using a formula developed from these data. A linear relationship was demonstrated between increasing percentage of HLA antibody grade and decreasing CI. A number of other factors were less important in the linear regression model than the aforementioned major factors. These included platelet-specific antibodies, concurrent antibacterial antibiotics, clinical bleeding grade, and temperature. Factors that did not influence CI included the number of prior platelet transfusions, prior granulocyte transfusions, prior red cell transfusions, infection, age, blood group, diagnosis, sex, pretransfusion platelet count, prior pregnancies, and concurrent antineoplastic drugs. This study identified major clinical factors that significantly influenced CI and were major causes of refractoriness to pooled platelet transfusions.
Clinical factors influencing the efficacy of pooled platelet transfusionsTo determine the relative importance of clinical factors on the efficacy of platelet transfusions, 941 pooled platelet transfusions from HLA-unmatched donors were studied prospectively in 133 patients with bone marrow failure. Multiple linear regression analyses identified the major factors influencing one-hour-corrected increments (CI) as prior splenectomy, bone marrow transplantation, disseminated intravascular coagulation, concurrent intravenous amphotericin B, splenomegaly, and HLA antibody grade. The relative impact of these factors on CI has been quantitated by using a formula developed from these data. A linear relationship was demonstrated between increasing percentage of HLA antibody grade and decreasing CI. A number of other factors were less important in the linear regression model than the aforementioned major factors. These included platelet-specific antibodies, concurrent antibacterial antibiotics, clinical bleeding grade, and temperature. Factors that did not influence CI included the number of prior platelet transfusions, prior granulocyte transfusions, prior red cell transfusions, infection, age, blood group, diagnosis, sex, pretransfusion platelet count, prior pregnancies, and concurrent antineoplastic drugs. This study identified major clinical factors that significantly influenced CI and were major causes of refractoriness to pooled platelet transfusions.
Etoposide in acute nonlymphocytic leukemia. Australian Leukemia Study GroupPreviously untreated patients with acute nonlymphocytic leukemia (ANLL) aged 15 to 70 years were randomized to either cytosine arabinoside 100 mg/m2/d continuous intravenous (IV) infusion days 1 through 7, daunorubicin 50 mg/m2/d IV days 1 through 3 (7–3), or the same drugs intensified with etoposide 75 mg/m2/d IV days 1 through 7 (7–3–7) as induction therapy. Patients achieving complete remission (CR) received two courses of consolidation therapy (5–2 or 5–2–5) followed by maintenance therapy. Of 264 eligible patients, CR occurred in 56% of 7– 3 and 59% of 7–3–7 patients; 7–3–7 significantly improved remission duration (P = .01). The median remission duration was 12 months for 7–3 and 18 months for 7–3–7. Survival was similar when the two arms were compared overall. Subset analysis performed to identify patients with the most benefit showed that etoposide significantly prolonged remission duration in younger patients (less than 55 years) with a median of 12 months for 7–3 and 27 months for 7–3–7 (P = .01). Survival appeared to be prolonged with 7–3–7 in patients aged less than 55 years, with a median of 9 months for 7–3 as compared with 17 months for 7–3–7 (P = .03). In older patients (aged greater than or equal to 55 years), 7–3–7 was more toxic, with significantly more severe [World Health Organization (WHO) grade 3 or 4] stomatitis (P = .02) and no additional clinical benefit. Hematologic toxicity for induction courses was similar, with granulocytopenia less than 0.5 x 10(9)/L for a median of 16 days per course for 7–3 and 15 days for 7–3–7. Hematologic toxicity was more severe for 5–2–5 consolidation courses (P = .003). Induction and consolidation therapy intensified with etoposide resulted in significantly improved remission duration but not survival.