Shanghai Institute of Pharmaceutical Industry
Publishes on Cell death mechanisms and regulation, Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors Research, Cancer-related Molecular Pathways. 55 papers and 3.6k citations.
Add your photo, update your bio, and get notified when your ranking changes.
Interactions between the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib and histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDIs) have been examined in Bcr/Abl+ human leukemia cells (K562 and LAMA 84). Coexposure of cells (24-48 hours) to minimally toxic concentrations of bortezomib + either suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid (SAHA) or sodium butyrate (SB) resulted in a striking increase in mitochondrial injury, caspase activation, and apoptosis, reflected by caspases-3 and -8 cleavage and poly(adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase (PARP) degradation. These events were accompanied by down-regulation of the Raf-1/mitogen-induced extracellular kinase (MEK)/extracellular signal-related kinase (ERK) pathway as well as diminished expression of Bcr/Abl and cyclin D1, cleavage of p21CIP1 and phosphorylation of the retinoblastoma protein (pRb), and induction of the stress-related kinases Jun kinase (JNK) and p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK). Transient transfection of cells with a constitutively active MEK construct significantly protected them from bortezomib/SAHA-mediated lethality. Coadministration of bortezomib and SAHA resulted in increased reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation and diminished nuclear factor kappa B (NF-kappa B) activation; moreover, the free radical scavenger L-N-acetylcyteine (LNAC) blocked bortezomib/SAHA-related ROS generation, induction of JNK and p21CIP1, and apoptosis. Lastly, this regimen potently induced apoptosis in STI571 (imatinib mesylate)-resistant K562 cells and CD34+ mononuclear cells obtained from a patient with STI571-resistant disease, as well as in Bcr/Abl- leukemia cells (eg, HL-60, U937, Jurkat). Together, these findings raise the possibility that combined proteasome/histone deacetylase inhibition may represent a novel strategy in leukemia, including apoptosis-resistant Bcr/Abl+ hematologic malignancies.
UNLABELLED: It has been shown that the heparin-degrading endosulfatase, sulfatase 1 (SULF1), functions as a liver tumor suppressor, but the role of the related sulfatase, sulfatase 2 (SULF2), in liver carcinogenesis remains to be elucidated. We investigated the effect of SULF2 on liver tumorigenesis. Expression of SULF2 was increased in 79 (57%) of 139 hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) and 8 (73%) of 11 HCC cell lines. Forced expression of SULF2 increased HCC cell growth and migration, whereas knockdown of SULF2 using short hairpin RNA targeting SULF2 abrogated HCC cell proliferation and migration in vitro. Because SULF1 and SULF2 desulfate heparan sulfate proteoglycans (HSPGs) and the HSPG glypican 3 (GPC3) is up-regulated in HCC, we investigated the effects of SULF2 on GPC3 expression and the association of SULF2 with GPC3. SULF2-mediated cell growth was associated with increased binding of fibroblast growth factor 2 (FGF2), phosphorylation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase and AKT, and expression of GPC3. Knockdown of GPC3 attenuated FGF2 binding in SULF2-expressing HCC cells. The effects of SULF2 on up-regulation of GPC3 and tumor growth were confirmed in nude mouse xenografts. Moreover, HCC patients with increased SULF2 expression in resected HCC tissues had a worse prognosis and a higher rate of recurrence after surgery. CONCLUSION: In contrast to the tumor suppressor effect of SULF1, SULF2 has an oncogenic effect in HCC mediated in part through up-regulation of FGF signaling and GPC3 expression.
Interactions between the kinase inhibitor STI571 and pharmacological antagonists of the mitogen-activated protein/extracellular signal-regulated kinase kinase (MEK)/mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) cascade have been examined in human myeloid leukemia cells (K562 and LAMA 84) that express the Bcr-Abl kinase. Exposure of K562 cells to concentrations of STI571 that minimally induced apoptosis (e.g., approximately 200 nM) resulted in early suppression (i.e., at 6 h) of p42/44 MAPK phosphorylation followed at later intervals (i.e., > or =24 h) by a marked increase in p42/44 MAPK phosphorylation/activation. Coadministration of a nontoxic concentration of the MEK1/2 inhibitor PD184352 (5 microM) prevented STI571-mediated activation of p42/44 MAPK. Cells exposed to STI571 in combination with PD184352 for 48 h demonstrated a very dramatic increase in mitochondrial dysfunction (e.g., loss of DeltaPsim and cytosolic cytochrome c release) associated with procaspase-3 activation, poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase cleavage, and the appearance of the characteristic morphological features of apoptosis. Similar results were obtained using other pharmacological MEK1/2 inhibitors (e.g., PD 98059 and U0126) as well as another leukemic cell line that expresses Bcr-Abl (e.g., LAMA 84). However, synergistic induction of apoptosis by STI571 and PD184352 was not observed in human myeloid leukemia cells that do not express the Bcr-Abl kinase (e.g., HL-60 and U937) nor in normal human peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Synergistic potentiation of STI571-mediated lethality by PD184352 was associated with multiple perturbations in signaling and apoptotic regulatory pathways, including caspase-dependent down-regulation of Bcr-Abl and Bcl-2; caspase-independent down-regulation of Bcl-x(L) and Mcl-1; activation of JNK, p38 MAPK, and p34(cdc2); and diminished phosphorylation of Stat5 and CREB. Significantly, coexposure to PD184352 strikingly increased the lethality of a pharmacologically achievable concentration of STI571 (i.e., 1-2 microM) in resistant K562 cells expressing marked increases in Bcr-Abl protein levels. Together, these findings raise the possibility that treatment of Bcr-Abl-expressing cells with STI571 elicits a cytoprotective MAPK activation response and that interruption of the latter pathway (e.g., by pharmacological MEK1/2 inhibitors) is associated with a highly synergistic induction of mitochondrial damage and apoptosis. They also indicate that in the case of Bcr-Abl-positive cells, simultaneous interruption of two signal transduction pathways may represent an effective antileukemic strategy.