Sakshi Khurana

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has been reported to cause cardiovascular complications including myocarditis, pericardial effusion, pericarditis, and arrhythmias. With the introduction of the vaccine, there have been reports of myocarditis possibly associated with the mRNA COVID-19 vaccine. We report a case of cardiac involvement following the second dose of Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine in a young male. A healthy 24-year-old male presented to the emergency department with complaints of non-radiating mid-sternal chest pain and pressure. He noticed his symptoms started six hours after he received the second dose of Pfizer COVID vaccine. Laboratory tests revealed elevated cardiac troponin I-CtNI levels. Computed tomography angiography of the chest did not show evidence of pulmonary embolism. Given his presentation of acute chest pain associated with elevated troponin levels, a coronary angiogram was performed which revealed normal coronary arteries. He was subsequently treated for acute peri-myocarditis with colchicine, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), and beta-blockers for tachycardia and the prevention of arrhythmia. Although rare, clinicians should be aware of the risk for myocarditis and pericarditis, which should be considered in individuals presenting with chest pain within a week after vaccination, especially in the younger population. Although the long-term risk in these patients is uncertain, early diagnosis and treatment are key to minimizing complications.

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) and lung cancer are among the leading causes of mortality worldwide, with a significant interplay that complicates patient management and treatment outcomes. This review explores the complex relationship between various forms of CVD - such as coronary artery disease, heart failure (HF), arrhythmias, and valvular heart disease - and lung cancer. Shared risk factors, including smoking, aging, and chronic inflammation, contribute to the co-occurrence of these conditions. Additionally, treatments for lung cancer, particularly chemotherapy and radiation therapy, can exacerbate CVD, necessitating a multidisciplinary approach to patient care. We delve into specific CVD-related impacts on lung cancer prognosis and vice versa, examining mechanisms, clinical outcomes, and management strategies. Our findings highlight the need for integrated care involving oncologists, cardiologists, and other healthcare providers to optimize treatment plans and improve patient outcomes. Emphasizing comprehensive cardiovascular risk management in lung cancer patients, we advocate for further research to deepen our understanding and develop novel therapeutic approaches, ultimately enhancing the quality of life and survival rates in patients suffering from both CVD and lung cancer.

Patients admitted to the hospital can develop thrombocytopenia due to multifactorial causes. It can be pseudo-thrombocytopenia or true thrombocytopenia. Among patients admitted for chest pain, coronary angiography (CAG) is a common diagnostic test to evaluate patients for coronary artery disease (CAD). Normally, patients undergoing angiogram receive antiplatelets and anticoagulants pre-catheterization, and platelet aggregation inhibitor agents are sometimes used during and after CAG like in patients with high thrombus burden. Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitors are a type of platelet antiaggregant agents that can cause severe thrombocytopenia in few cases. We present a case of a 68-year-old patient who came to the emergency department with inferior wall ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and underwent angiography and had percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) done. He was administered tirofiban during the angiogram that caused acute severe thrombocytopenia decreasing platelets count to 4000/microliter within one day. Patients' platelets gradually recovered after platelets transfusion.

BACKGROUND: The purposes of this study were to assess the value of phase for characterization of female pelvic lesions with hemorrhage in various stages and to differentiate them from calcified lesions at 3.0-T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). METHODS: Forty-four female patients with hemorrhagic (n = 37) or calcified (n = 7) pelvic pathology underwent conventional MRI including susceptibility-weighted imaging with phase information. Hemorrhagic lesions were grouped into acute, subacute, and chronic, and calcified lesions were detected on the basis of conventional imaging findings. Phase quantification of these hemorrhagic and calcified lesions was performed. RESULTS: The phase values significantly differed (P < 0.001) among various stages of hemorrhage, as well as calcification (chronic hemorrhage, -65.09 ± 9.09 degrees; subacute hemorrhage, -11.41 ± 4.4 degrees; acute hemorrhage, -42.30 ± 5.20 degrees; and calcified lesions, 117.55 ± 12.93 degrees). CONCLUSIONS: Quantitative phase imaging has the potential to differentiate various stages of hemorrhagic and calcified pathologies. This may add value to the conventional MRI in improved characterization of these entities in female pelvic pathologies.