M. Waseem

A prospective randomized controlled trial comparing open and percutaneous repair of closed ruptured Achilles tendons was performed over a period of 30 months. Sixty-six patients from seven district general hospitals were entered into the study with 33 patients randomized into each group. A modification of the technique described by Ma and Griffith was used in the percutaneous group and a Kessler suture supplemented with interrupted sutures was used in the open group. Patients were followed up for a minimum of six months. The mean age was 38.5 years (26 to 53 years). Forty patients were male and 26 female. After the rupturing event but prior to surgery, it was noted that seven patients had paresthesia in the territory of the sural nerve. The mean duration of immobilization was 12.4 weeks (10 to 14). The complications in the open group included seven wound infections (21%), two adhesions (6%) and two cases of re-rupture (6%). In the percutaneous group there were three cases of wound puckering (9%), one re-rupture (3%) and one case with persistent paresthesia in the sural nerve territory (3%). The difference in infective wound complications between the two groups was statistically significant (Fisher's exact test P = 0.01). Percutaneous repair is advocated on the basis of the low rate of complications and improved cosmetic appearance.

The assessment and management of patients with instability of the shoulder joint can be challenging, due to the varying ways patients present, the array of different classification systems, the confusing terminology used and the differing potential management strategies. This review article aims to provide a clear explanation of the common concepts in shoulder instability and how they relate to the assessment and management of patients. There are sections covering the mechanisms of shoulder stability, the clinical assessment of patients and imaging techniques. Beyond that there is a discussion on the common classifications systems used and the typical management options. Some patients fall into reasonably well defined categories of classification and in these cases, the management plan is relatively easy to define. Unfortunately, other patients can elude simple classification and in these instances their management requires very careful consideration. Further research may help to facilitate a better understanding of management of the patients in this latter group.