RETRACTED: DNA Content as a Prognostic Marker in Patients with Oral LeukoplakiaJon Sudbø, Wanja Kildal, Bjørn Risberg et al.|New England Journal of Medicine|2001 BACKGROUND: Oral leukoplakia may develop into squamous-cell carcinoma, which has a poor prognosis. Risk factors for oral carcinoma have been identified, but there are no reliable predictors of the outcome in individual patients with oral leukoplakia. METHODS: We identified 150 patients with oral leukoplakia that was classified as epithelial dysplasia and measured the nuclear DNA content (ploidy) of the lesions to determine whether DNA ploidy could be used to predict the clinical outcome. Biopsy specimens obtained at annual follow-up visits were graded histologically and classified with respect to DNA content in a blinded fashion. Disease-free survival was assessed in relation to DNA ploidy and the histologic grade. The mean duration of follow-up was 103 months (range, 4 to 165). RESULTS: Among 150 patients with verified epithelial dysplasia, a carcinoma developed in 36 (24 percent). Of the 150 patients, 105 (70 percent) had diploid (normal) lesions, 20 (13 percent) had tetraploid (intermediate) lesions, and 25 (17 percent) had aneuploid (abnormal) lesions at the time of the initial diagnosis. A carcinoma developed in 3 of the 105 patients with diploid lesions (3 percent), as compared with 21 of the 25 patients with aneuploid lesions (84 percent), yielding a negative predictive value of 97 percent with respect to the diploid lesions and a positive predictive value of 84 percent with respect to the aneuploid lesions. Carcinoma developed in 12 of 20 patients with tetraploid lesions (60 percent). The mean time from the initial assessment of the DNA content to the development of a carcinoma was 35 months (range, 4 to 57) in the group with aneuploid lesions and 49 months (range, 8 to 78) in the group with tetraploid lesions (P=0.02). The cumulative disease-free survival rate was 97 percent among the group with diploid lesions, 40 percent among the group with tetraploid lesions, and 16 percent among the group with aneuploid lesions (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The DNA content in cells of oral leukoplakia can be used to predict the risk of oral carcinoma.
Granulosa Cell Tumors of the Ovary: Prognostic Factors and OutcomeEGFR family expression in breast carcinomas. c‐erbB‐2 and c‐erbB‐4 receptors have different effects on survivalZhenhe Suo, Bjørn Risberg, Mats G. Kalsson et al.|The Journal of Pathology|2001 One hundred patients with breast carcinoma followed for 7-11 years were included in the present study of EGFR family members, using immunohistochemistry and RT-PCR. By immunohistochemistry, 36%, 27%, 26%, and 82% of the tumours were positive for EGFR, c-erbB-2, c-erbB-3, and c-erbB-4. All the immunoreactive tumours were confirmed positive by RT-PCR. Tumour size, histological grade, lymph node status, S-phase fraction, and stage were confirmed to be significantly associated with both disease-free and cancer-specific survival in the present study. Methods of treatment, histological type, and ploidy had no significant effect on survival. Statistical analysis of EGFR family members in these tumours showed a significant association between c-erbB-2 expression and reduced disease-free and cancer-specific survival. c-erbB-4 expression was associated with a more favourable outcome. Co-expression of c-erbB-2 and EGFR was associated with a worse prognosis. c-erbB-4 expression, however, showed an antagonistic effect on the clinical influence of c-erbB-2 expression. In conclusion, c-erbB-2 expression in breast carcinomas is associated with an unfavourable clinical course and EGFR expression has a synergistic effect. However, c-erbB-4 antagonizes the c-erbB-2 effect on clinical course in breast carcinomas. To achieve best results with immunotherapy against the c-erbB-2 receptor, clarifying the status of c-erbB-4 expression may be of significance.
Tumor Size, Depth of Invasion, and Grading of the Invasive Tumor Front Are the Main Prognostic Factors in Early Squamous Cell Cervical CarcinomaThe Role of Desmin and N-Cadherin in Effusion CytologyBen Davidson, Søren Nielsen, Jette Christensen et al.|The American Journal of Surgical Pathology|2001 The objective of the present study was to analyze the role of the mesothelial markers desmin and N-cadherin in the diagnostic panel of serous effusions. A total of 181 pleural and peritoneal effusions consisted of 101 cases cytologically diagnosed as malignant (89 carcinomas, 12 mesotheliomas), 78 benign, and 2 inconclusive specimens. All specimens were immunostained using 11 antibodies, against epithelial membrane antigen, Ber-EP4, carcinoembryonic antigen, E-cadherin, CA 125, N-cadherin, desmin, calretinin, p53, vimentin, and CD45. After evaluation of immunocytochemistry results, 110 specimens were diagnosed as malignant (98 carcinomas, 12 mesotheliomas) and 71 as benign (56 cellular, 15 paucicellular). The presence of desmin was detected in benign mesothelial cells in 47 of 56 (84%) reactive cellular specimens compared with 1 of 12 (8%) malignant mesotheliomas and 2 of 98 (2%) carcinomas. N-cadherin was expressed in 48 of 56 (86%) reactive cases, 12 of 12 (100%) mesotheliomas, and 47 of 98 (48%) carcinomas. In carcinomas, N-cadherin expression was most often seen in ovarian carcinoma but was also found in other carcinomas. Calretinin, an established marker of mesothelial cells, was detected in 52 of 56 (93%) reactive specimens, 11 of 12 (93%) mesotheliomas, and 3 of 98 (3%) carcinomas. Evaluation of staining results led to reclassification of six malignant specimens as benign, whereas 17 cases diagnosed as benign and the two diagnosed as inconclusive were classified as malignant. In conclusion, desmin appears to be a promising marker for the distinction between reactive mesothelium and malignant epithelial cells in terms of both specificity and sensitivity, and its complementary use with calretinin is recommended. Unlike calretinin, it may also prove valuable for the distinction between benign and malignant mesothelial cells. N-cadherin does not have a role in the distinction between mesothelial and epithelial cells. However, it may prove useful in the characterization of carcinomas of unknown origin. As has previously been shown, a significant number of diagnoses that are based on morphologic examination alone are modified after the use of a broad antibody panel.