John D. Pirsch

BACKGROUND: Tacrolimus (FK506), a macrolide molecule that potently inhibits the expression of interleukin 2 by T lymphocytes, represents a potential major advance in the management of rejection following solid-organ transplantation. This randomized, open-label study compared the efficacy and safety of tacrolimus-based versus cyclosporine-based immunosuppression in patients receiving cadaveric kidney transplants. METHODS: A total of 412 patients were randomized to tacrolimus (n=205) or cyclosporine (n=207) after cadaveric renal transplantation and were followed for 1 year for patient and graft survival and the incidence of acute rejection. RESULTS: One-year patient survival rates were 95.6% for tacrolimus and 96.6% for cyclosporine (P=0.576). Corresponding 1-year graft survival rates were 91.2% and 87.9% (P=0.289). There was a significant reduction in the incidence of biopsy-confirmed acute rejection in the tacrolimus group (30.7%) compared with the cyclosporine group (46.4%, P=0.001), which was confirmed by blinded review, and in the use of antilymphocyte therapy for rejection (10.7% and 25.1%, respectively; P<0.001). Impaired renal function, gastrointestinal disorders, and neurological complications were commonly reported in both treatment groups, but tremor and paresthesia were more frequent in the tacrolimus group. The incidence of posttransplant diabetes mellitus was 19.9% in the tacrolimus group and 4.0% in the cyclosporine group (P<0.001), and was reversible in some patients. CONCLUSIONS: Tacrolimus is more effective than cyclosporine in preventing acute rejection in cadaveric renal allograft recipients, and significantly reduces the use of antilymphocyte antibody preparations. Tacrolimus was associated with a higher incidence of neurologic events, which were rarely treatment limiting, and with posttransplant diabetes mellitus, which was reversible in some patients.

In a retrospective analysis on 323 orthotopic liver transplant procedures performed between July 1984 and October 1991 the incidence of two forms of primary dysfunction (PDF) of the liver: primary nonfunction (PNF), and initial poor function (IPF) were studied. The incidence of PDF was 22% (73/323) with 6% PNF (20/323) and 16% IPF (53/323), while 78% (250/323) had immediate function (IF). Occurrence of both IPF and PNF resulted in a higher graft failure rate (P < 0.001), retransplantation rate (P < 0.001), and patient mortality (P < 0.003) within the first three months after OLTx. Univariate analyses of donor and recipient factors and their influence on PDF demonstrated that longer donor hospitalization (> 3 days), older donor age (> 49 years), extended preservation times (> 18 hr), and fatty changes in the donor liver biopsy, as well as reduced-size livers, younger recipient age, and renal insufficiency prior to OLTx, significantly affected the incidence of IPF and PNF. Multivariate analysis of potential risk factors showed that reduced-size liver (P = 0.0001), fatty changes on donor liver biopsy (P = 0.001), older donor age (P = 0.009), retransplantation (P = 0.01), renal insufficiency (P = 0.02), and prolonged cold ischemia times (P = 0.02) were independently associated with a higher incidence of IPF and PNF. No statistical correlation was found between PDF and etiology of ESLD, nutritional status of the recipient, UNOS status, and Child-Pugh classification in this study. We conclude that PNF and IPF are both separate clinical entities that have a significant effect on outcome after OLTx. Routine donor liver biopsies are recommended to decrease the rate of IPF and PNF. The combination of risk factors shown to be significant for PDF should be avoided--and, if that is not possible, the only variable that can be controlled, the preservation time, should be kept as short as possible.

In Brief Objective: To compare outcomes with early corticosteroid withdrawal (CSWD) and chronic low dose corticosteroid therapy (CCS). Summary Background Data: Final, 5-year results from the first randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of early CSWD (at 7 days posttransplant) are presented. Methods: Adult recipients of deceased and living donor kidney transplants without delayed graft function were randomized to receive prednisone (5 mg/d after 6 months posttransplant) or CSWD. Blinding was maintained for 5 years. This clinical trial is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT00650468). Results: Results in 386 patients CSWD (n = 191), CCS (n = 195) are presented (CSWD; CCS). No differences were observed at 5 years in the proportion of patients experiencing: primary end point (composite of death, graft loss, or moderate/severe acute rejection) (30/191 (15.7%); 28/195 (14.4%)), patient death (11/191(5.8%);13/195 (6.7%)), death-censored graft loss (11/191 (5.8%); 7/195(3.6%)), biopsy confirmed acute rejection (BCAR) (34/191 (17.8%); 21/195 (10.8%), P = 0.058), moderate/severe acute rejection (15/191 (7.9%); 12/195 (6.2%)). Kaplan Meier analyses of the primary end point and its components also showed no differences; but BCAR was higher with CSWD (P = 0.04). Increased BCAR episodes were primarily corticosteroid-sensitive Banff 1A rejections: the incidence of antibody-treated BCAR was similar between groups (11/191 (5.8%); 13/195 (6.7%)). No differences in renal function were observed at 5 years: mean serum creatinine (1.5 ± 0.6; 1.5 ± 0.7 mg/dL), or Cockroft Gault calculated creatinine clearance (58.6 ± 19.7; 59.8 ± 20.5 mL/min). CSWD was associated with improved serum triglycerides (evaluated by mean and median change from baseline) at all time points (except at 5 years measured by mean change). Weight change also demonstrated changes favoring CSWD (median change from baseline at 5 years: 5.1 vs. 7.7 kg, P = 0.05). New onset diabetes after transplant (NODAT) was similar with respect to proportions who required treatment (23/107 (21.5%)); 18/86 (20.9%); however, fewer CSWD patients required insulin for NODAT at 5 years (4/107 (3.7%)); 10/86 (11.6%), P = 0.049). Changes in HgA1c values (from baseline) were lower in CSWD patients at all time points except 4 years. Conclusions: Early CSWD, compared with CCS, is associated with an increase in BCAR primarily because of mild, Banff 1A, steroid-sensitive rejection, yet provides similar long-term renal allograft survival and function. CSWD provides improvements in cardiovascular risk factors (triglycerides, NODAT requiring insulin, weight gain). Tacrolimus/MMF/antibody induction therapy allows early CSWD with results comparable to long-term low dose (5 mg/d) prednisone therapy. Final results from the first prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial of early corticosteroid withdrawal in kidney transplantation are reported. This trial, which was blinded for 5 years, demonstrates that early corticosteroid withdrawal (under induction therapy with tacrolimus/mycophenolate mofetil therapy), as compared to chronic corticosteroid therapy, provides similar patient survival, and renal allograft survival and function. Early corticosteroid withdrawal was associated with increased acute rejection risk, but also provided improvements in several corticosteroid-related morbidities including post-transplant diabetes, weight gain, and triglycerides.

Methods of accurately assessing the suitability of donor livers prior to transplantation are required if the incidence of primary nonfunction (PNF) is to be reduced. This study evaluated the ability of donor liver biopsies to predict the development of primary nonfunction after transplantation. From June 1987 until May 1990, 170 liver transplants were performed in 147 patients. A total of 124 donor liver biopsies were obtained and divided into three groups. Group 1 biopsies (n = 77) were obtained after revascularization of the liver, group 2 biopsies (n = 19) were obtained prior to donor hepatectomy but examined only after implantation, and group 3 biopsies (n = 28) were obtained as in group 2, but were examined prior to implantation. Three of 89 (3.4%) livers interpreted as having normal histology developed primary nonfunction, while one of 26 (3.8%) biopsies interpreted as having a minimal or moderate amount of fatty infiltration developed primary nonfunction. PNF occurred in 7 of 8 livers with severe fatty infiltration (3), hydropic degeneration (3), and centrilobular necrosis (1). A fourth liver with hydropic degeneration and poor function ultimately failed requiring retransplantation 8 weeks later. Analysis of liver function revealed progressive elevation in aspartate-aminotransferase, alanine-aminotransferase, lactate dehydrogenase, and serum ammonia (NH3) with increasing degrees of fatty infiltration. Donor age and weight was also found to be significantly higher in livers with fatty infiltration. This study suggests that donor liver biopsies demonstrating normal histology or minimal-to-moderate fatty infiltration function adequately, but that donor livers with severe fatty infiltration or hydropic degeneration function poorly and should not be transplanted.

Campath‐1H, an anti‐CD52 monoclonal antibody, was used as induction therapy (40 mg i.v. total dose) in 29 primary human renal transplants, and the patients were maintained on rapamycin monotherapy (levels 8–15 ng/mL) post‐transplant. Campath‐1H profoundly depletes lymphocytes long‐term and more transiently depletes B cells and monocytes. All patients are alive and well at 3–29 months of follow up. One graft was lost because of rejection. There have been no systemic infections and no malignancies. Eight of 29 patients have experienced rejection, which was successfully treated in seven of eight patients. Five of these patients had pathological evidence of a humoral component of their rejection. Seven of the 29 patients were converted to standard triple therapy on account of rejection. Rapamycin was generally well tolerated in that there were no significant wound‐healing problems; two lymphoceles required surgical drainage; and most patients were treated with a lipid‐lowering agent. Flow crossmatch testing post‐transplant revealed evidence of alloantibody in two patients tested with previous combined cellular and humoral rejection. Biopsies have shown no chronic allograft nephropathy to date. In view of the relatively high incidence of early humoral rejection, we plan to modify the immunosuppressive regimen in subsequent pilot studies. This clinical trial provides insight into the use of Campath‐1H induction in combination with rapamycin maintenance monotherapy. Campath‐1H, an anti‐CD52 monoclonal antibody, was used as induction therapy (40 mg i.v. total dose) in 29 primary human renal transplants, and the patients were maintained on rapamycin monotherapy (levels 8–15 ng/mL) post‐transplant. Campath‐1H profoundly depletes lymphocytes long‐term and more transiently depletes B cells and monocytes. All patients are alive and well at 3–29 months of follow up. One graft was lost because of rejection. There have been no systemic infections and no malignancies. Eight of 29 patients have experienced rejection, which was successfully treated in seven of eight patients. Five of these patients had pathological evidence of a humoral component of their rejection. Seven of the 29 patients were converted to standard triple therapy on account of rejection. Rapamycin was generally well tolerated in that there were no significant wound‐healing problems; two lymphoceles required surgical drainage; and most patients were treated with a lipid‐lowering agent. Flow crossmatch testing post‐transplant revealed evidence of alloantibody in two patients tested with previous combined cellular and humoral rejection. Biopsies have shown no chronic allograft nephropathy to date. In view of the relatively high incidence of early humoral rejection, we plan to modify the immunosuppressive regimen in subsequent pilot studies. This clinical trial provides insight into the use of Campath‐1H induction in combination with rapamycin maintenance monotherapy.