Hao Weng

Histones are intra-nuclear cationic proteins that are present in all eukaryotic cells and are highly conserved across species. Within the nucleus, they provide structural stability to chromatin and regulate gene expression. Histone may be released into the extracellular space in three forms: freely, as a DNA-bound nucleosome or as part of neutrophil extracellular traps, and all three can be detected in serum after significant cellular death such as sepsis, trauma, ischaemia/reperfusion injury and autoimmune disease. Once in the extracellular space, histones act as damage-associated molecular pattern proteins, activating the immune system and causing further cytotoxicity. They interact with Toll-like receptors (TLRs), complement and the phospholipids of cell membranes inducing endothelial and epithelial cytotoxicity, TLR2/TLR4/TLR9 activation and pro-inflammatory cytokine/chemokine release via MyD88, NFκB and NLRP3 inflammasome-dependent pathways. Drugs that block the release of histone, neutralise circulating histone or block histone signal transduction provide significant protection from mortality in animal models of acute organ injury but warrant further research to inform future clinical applications.

Metastasis-associated lung adenocarcinoma transcript 1 (MALAT1), a long non-coding RNA (lncRNA), is associated with metastasis and is an independent prognostic factor for lung cancer. Recent studies have demonstrated that MALAT1 plays an important role in other malignancies. However, little is known about the role of MALAT1 in gallbladder carcinoma (GBC), which is the most common cancer of the biliary tract and has an extremely poor prognosis. In this study, we focused on the expression, biological functions and mechanism of MALAT1 in GBC and found that MALAT1 was significantly upregulated in GBC tissues compared with corresponding non-cancerous tissues. Knockdown of MALAT1 in GBC cell lines using lentivirus-mediated RNA interference significantly inhibited the proliferation and metastasis of the GBC cells both in vitro and in vivo. Furthermore, ERK/MAPK pathway was found to be inactivated in the GBC cell lines after MALAT1 knockdown. These results indicated that MALAT1 might serve as an oncogenic lncRNA that promotes proliferation and metastasis of GBC and activates the ERK/MAPK pathway

OBJECTIVE: Ciprofol is a new intravenous anesthetic agent similar to propofol that has the pharmacodynamic characteristics of a rapid rate of onset and recovery in pre-clinical experiments. The aims of the present clinical trials were to compare the efficacy and safety of ciprofol emulsion for sedation or general anesthesia during colonoscopy and to define optimal doses for a subsequent phase III clinical trial. METHODS: A phase IIa multi-center, open-label, non-randomized, positive control, dose-escalating study was performed to determine a recommended phase IIb dose (RP2D) of ciprofol to induce sedation or anesthesia in patients undergoing colonoscopy. Phase IIb was also a multi-center clinical trial, but the patients were randomized into 3 groups at a ratio of 1:1:1. It was a double-blinded, propofol controlled study that administered ciprofol 0.4 mg/kg (n = 31) and 0.5 mg/kg (n = 32) or propofol at 2.0 mg/kg (n = 31), with the aim of establishing the optimal dose of ciprofol. The primary endpoint was the colonoscopy success rate. Secondary endpoints were the duration of colonoscope insertion, recovery time, number of top-up doses needed, and the total dose of ciprofol or propofol required to maintain adequate sedation or anesthesia. In addition, we evaluated the satisfaction of sedation/anesthesia from the endoscopists, anesthetists and patients' points of view. Safety was assessed according to the incidence of AEs including serious AEs and drug related AEs and the assessment of vital signs, a 12-lead ECG and laboratory tests. RESULTS: In the phase IIa trial, the colonoscopy success rates in the 0.2-0.5 mg/kg ciprofol and propofol 2.0 mg/kg groups were 100% and all doses were safe and well tolerated. Ciprofol doses of 0.4 mg/kg and 0.5 mg/kg are recommended for subsequent IIb phases. In the phase IIb trial, a 100% success rate was reconfirmed in all the dosage groups. The mean time of colonoscope insertion in the ciprofol 0.4 mg/kg, ciprofol 0.5 mg/kg and propofol 2.0 mg/kg groups were 1.9, 1.5 and 1.5 min, the mean recovery times from colonoscope withdrawal were 6.1, 5.1, and 4.3 min, and the times to discharge were 11.8, 11.2 and 10.6 min, respectively. The satisfaction ratings of anesthetists in the ciprofol 0.5 mg/kg group (9.5 ± 0.8) were higher than in the ciprofol 0.4 mg/kg (9.2 ± 1.0) and propofol 2.0 mg/kg (9.2 ± 0.9) groups. The incidence of sedation and anesthesia-related AEs was highest in the propofol 2.0 mg/kg group (25.8%), followed by the ciprofol 0.5 mg/kg group (21.9%), and was least in the ciprofol 0.4 mg/kg group (16.1%) (P = 0.750). CONCLUSIONS: Ciprofol was safe and well tolerated at doses ranging from 0.1 mg/kg to 0.5 mg/kg. Ciprofol 0.4-0.5 mg/kg induced equivalent sedation/anesthesia and had a similar safety profile to propofol 2.0 mg/kg during colonoscopy without producing serious AEs.