Robert Lindsay

Data on the number of U.S. women with low femoral bone mineral density (BMD) are currently available only from indirect estimates. We used dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) measurements of femoral BMD from phase 1 of the third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III, 1988-1991) to estimate prevalences of low femoral BMD in women ages 50 years and older using an approach proposed recently by an expert panel of the World Health Organization (WHO). Cutpoints for low BMD were derived from BMD data of 194 non-Hispanic white (NHW) women aged 20-29 years from the NHANES III dataset. The prevalence of older U.S. women with femoral osteopenia (BMD between 1 standard deviation [SD] and 2.5 SD below the mean of young NHW women) ranged from 34-50% in four different femur regions, which corresponds to approximately 12-17 million women. The prevalence with osteoporosis (BMD > 2.5 SD below the mean of young NHW women) ranged from 17-20%, or approximately 6-7 million women. Prevalences were 1.3-2.4 times higher in NHW women than non-Hispanic black women (NHB), and 0.8-1.2 times higher in NHW versus Mexican American (MA) women. The estimated numbers of NHW, NHB, and MA women with osteopenia were 10-15 million, 800,000-1.2 million, and 300,000-400,000, respectively; corresponding figures for osteoporosis were 5-6 million, 200,000-300,000, and 100,000 respectively. Thus, the first data on BMD from a nationally representative sample of older women show a substantial number with low femoral BMD.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Abstract Most estimates of osteoporosis in older U.S. adults have been based on its occurrence in white women, even though it is known to affect men and minority women. In the present study, we used dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry measurements of femoral bone mineral density (BMD) from the third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III, 1988–1994) to estimate the overall scope of the disease in the older U.S. population. Specifically, we estimate prevalences of low femoral BMD in women 50 years and older and explore different approaches for defining low BMD in older men in that age range. Low BMD levels were defined in accordance with an approach proposed by an expert panel of the World Health Organization and used BMD data from 382 non-Hispanic white (NHW) men or 409 NHW women ages 20–29 years from the NHANES III dataset. For women, estimates indicate 13–18%, or 4–6 million, have osteoporosis (i.e., BMD >2.5 standard deviations [SD] below the mean of young NHW women) and 37–50%, or 13–17 million, have osteopenia (BMD between 1 and 2.5 SD below the mean of young NHW women). For men, these numbers depend on the gender of the reference group used to define cutoff values. When based on male cutoffs, 3–6% (1–2 million) of men have osteoporosis and 28–47% (8–13 million) have osteopenia; when based on female cutoffs, 1–4% (280,000–1 million) have osteoporosis and 15–33% (4–9 million) have osteopenia. Most of the older U.S. adults with low femur BMD are women, but, regardless of which cutoffs are used, the number of men is substantial.

PHYSICIANS have traditionally considered PTH to be an agent that is catabolic to the skeleton. However, as early as 60 yr ago, Albright and his colleagues (1) and later Selye (2) noted that the peptide extract could also be anabolic to the skeleton, producing increases in bone tissue in animals. The potential for an agent that can increase bone mass and hence reverse the skeletal defect in patients with osteoporosis is great, particularly if in doing so it also repairs microarchitectural damage. The agents currently available in the United States for treatment of osteoporosis, estrogens and salmon calcitonin, primarily stabilize bone mass and prevent further loss of bone, although a transient small increment in mass is often reported, particularly in patients with elevated levels of bone remodeling. This increase is not a true anabolic effect but is related to the temporal effects on turnover in which resorption declines initially followed by a reduction in formation that may take several months. Fluoride, in contrast, does increase bone mass by a true anabolic action, but there is controversy about the quality of the bone formed. Two recent controlled studies failed to find a reduction in fracture recurrence (3, 4), although the dose may have been excessive, and consequently, fluoride is currently not approved for treatment of osteoporosis in the United States. Thus, if PTH is capable of improving bone mass and quality, the peptide will have a potential therapeutic role in osteoporosis. This review summarizes the data available to date, starting at the cellular level.

UNLABELLED: Osteoporosis causes an elevated fracture risk. We propose the continued use of T-scores as one means for diagnosis but recommend that, alternatively, hip fracture; osteopenia-associated vertebral, proximal humerus, pelvis, or some wrist fractures; or FRAX scores with ≥3% (hip) or 20% (major) 10-year fracture risk also confer an osteoporosis diagnosis. INTRODUCTION: Osteoporosis is a common disorder of reduced bone strength that predisposes to an increased risk for fractures in older individuals. In the USA, the standard criterion for the diagnosis of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women and older men is a T-score of ≤ -2.5 at the lumbar spine, femur neck, or total hip by bone mineral density testing. METHODS: Under the direction of the National Bone Health Alliance, 17 clinicians and clinical scientists were appointed to a working group charged to determine the appropriate expansion of the criteria by which osteoporosis can be diagnosed. RESULTS: The group recommends that postmenopausal women and men aged 50 years should be diagnosed with osteoporosis if they have a demonstrable elevated risk for future fractures. This includes having a T-score of less than or equal to -2.5 at the spine or hip as one method for diagnosis but also permits a diagnosis for individuals in this population who have experienced a hip fracture with or without bone mineral density (BMD) testing and for those who have osteopenia by BMD who sustain a vertebral, proximal humeral, pelvic, or, in some cases, distal forearm fracture. Finally, the term osteoporosis should be used to diagnose individuals with an elevated fracture risk based on the World Health Organization Fracture Risk Algorithm, FRAX. CONCLUSIONS: As new ICD-10 codes become available, it is our hope that this new understanding of what osteoporosis represents will allow for an appropriate diagnosis when older individuals are recognized as being at an elevated risk for fracture.