L A Aday

OBJECTIVE: The behavioral model of utilization, developed by Andersen, Aday, and others, is one of the most frequently used frameworks for analyzing the factors that are associated with patient utilization of healthcare services. However, the use of the model for examining the context within which utilization occurs-the role of the environment and provider-related factors-has been largely neglected. OBJECTIVE: To conduct a systematic review and analysis to determine if studies of medical care utilization that have used the behavioral model during the last 20 years have included environmental and provider-related variables and the methods used to analyze these variables. We discuss barriers to the use of these contextual variables and potential solutions. DATA SOURCES: The Social Science Citation Index and Science Citation Index. We included all articles from 1975-1995 that cited any of three key articles on the behavioral model, that included all articles that were empirical analyses and studies of formal medical care utilization, and articles that specifically stated their use of the behavioral model (n = 139). STUDY DESIGN: Design was a systematic literature review. DATA ANALYSIS: We used a structured review process to code articles on whether they included contextual variables: (1) environmental variables (characteristics of the healthcare delivery system, external environment, and community-level enabling factors); and (2) provider-related variables (patient factors that may be influenced by providers and provider characteristics that interact with patient characteristics to influence utilization). We also examined the methods used in studies that included contextual variables. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Forty-five percent of the studies included environmental variables and 51 percent included provider-related variables. Few studies examined specific measures of the healthcare system or provider characteristics or used methods other than simple regression analysis with hierarchical entry of variables. Only 14 percent of studies analyzed the context of healthcare by including both environmental and provider-related variables as well as using relevant methods. CONCLUSIONS: By assessing whether and how contextual variables are used, we are able to highlight the contributions made by studies using these approaches, to identify variables and methods that have been relatively underused, and to suggest solutions to barriers in using contextual variables.

This paper examines the dimensions of the access concept with particular attention to the extent to which more parsimonious indicators of access can be developed. This process is especially useful to health policy makers, planners and researchers in need of cost-effective social indicators of access to monitor the need for and impact of innovative health care programs. Three stages of data reduction are used in the analysis, resulting in a reduced set of key indicators of the concept. Implication for subsequent data collection and measurement of access are discussed.

This study examined the impact of pain on self-rated health status in the community-dwelling older adults using the 1993 public release data of the Asset and Health Dynamics Among the Oldest Old (AHEAD). AHEAD is a population-based household survey designed to examine the dynamic interactions between health, family, and economic variables among US older adults. Results showed that 33% of the older adults reported frequent pain and 20% reported significant pain resulting in activity limitation. Controlling for clinical health status, socio-demographic characteristics, and access to medical care, logistic regression analyses showed that those who often have pain were more than twice as likely (odds ratio (OR)=2.63; confidence interval (CI)=2.35, 2.95; P=<0.0001) to perceive their health status to be "poor". Other predictors (P<0.01) include functional impairment (OR=2.78), chronic diseases (OR=1.89), minority status (OR=1.88), education (OR=1.77), and physician visits (OR=1.64). This study documents the adverse impact of pain on self-rated health as well as the fact that the experience of pain and poor subjective health and well-being is greatest among the most socially disadvantaged older adults (minorities and those with the least education). The findings suggest that treating and controlling pain may significantly enhance the subjective health and well-being of community-dwelling older adults.

PURPOSE: Patients with cancer must overcome many psychological, social, and economic barriers to obtain needed treatment. Because of the need for repeated visits for cancer treatment on either an outpatient or an inpatient basis, one of the major issues that patients with cancer must confront is that of arranging for transportation to care. METHODS: This study compares the distance and mode of transportation to radiotherapy and chemotherapy and perceptions of transportation as a barrier to care among white, black, and Hispanic cancer patients receiving treatment from a consortium of cancer treatment facilities in Texas. A mail questionnaire was developed to assess the perceived barriers to cancer treatment for patients who had been diagnosed clinically with breast, colon, cervical, or prostate cancer, or lymphoma between 1989 and 1993. A total of 910 surveys were mailed to prospective participants. Of the surveys mailed, 593 were returned, yielding a 65.2% response rate. By race, the respondents included whites (42%), blacks (40%), Hispanics (15%), and Asian-Pacific Islanders (3%). Two respondents were 17 years of age; the remaining respondents were 18 years or older. RESULTS: This study shows that some patients may forgo needed treatment because of problems with transportation. This was perceived as an issue more for minority patients than for white patients. Black and Hispanic patients consistently reported that barriers such as distance, access to an automobile, and availability of someone to drive them to the treatment center were potential major problems. The distance to the facilities was farther for whites than for blacks and Hispanics. Patients generally had to travel farther for chemotherapy than for radiotherapy. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Patients, particularly minorities, may opt to forgo needed care in the absence of available and affordable means of transportation to treatment facilities. These findings demonstrate the need for healthcare providers to be aware of the transportation problems that patients with cancer experience in obtaining treatment. Healthcare providers must work with patients, their families, and volunteer agencies in the community to facilitate transportation to cancer treatment services.

This paper presents analyses of recent national survey data on access to medical care. In particular, information on major access indicators and special problems associated with the economic and political climate of the 1980s collected in a 1982 national telephone survey of 6,610 United States adults and children, representing some 4,802 families, is compared with previous national surveys for key population subgroups--by age, place of residence, income, race, insurance coverage, and type of regular source of care. In general, the findings show that favorable progress has been made, but some inequities continue to persist. Some traditionally disadvantaged groups are more likely to have a regular family doctor, private insurance coverage, have been to a doctor, or had certain preventive tests and procedures than was true for them in the past. On the other hand, compared to the more economically and/or socially advantaged groups in 1982, they have still not "caught up" entirely. There also is evidence that they may be hardest hit by the exacerbation of the financial barriers to care that result from unemployment, inflation, and cutbacks in health program eligibility and benefits that have characterized the decade of the 1980s.