National Cancer Institute
Publishes on Epigenetics and DNA Methylation, Cancer-related gene regulation, Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics. 27 papers and 938 citations.
Add your photo, update your bio, and get notified when your ranking changes.
CONTEXT: Adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) is a rare malignancy with a poor prognosis in need of more effective treatment options. Published evidence indicates many ACCs express the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR), suggesting inhibiting vascular endothelial growth factor signaling could potentially impact tumor growth. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to determine the antitumor efficacy of axitinib (AG-013736), a potent, selective inhibitor of VEGFR1, -2, and -3. DESIGN: This was a phase II, open-label trial using a two-stage design. PATIENTS: Thirteen patients with metastatic ACC previously treated with at least one chemotherapy regimen with or without mitotane participated in the study. INTERVENTION: Starting axitinib dose was 5 mg orally twice daily. Dose escalations were permitted if the administered dose was tolerable. RESULTS: Thirteen patients were enrolled. Dose escalation was possible in seven patients, but the majority could not tolerate a dose higher than the starting 5 mg, twice-daily dose for prolonged periods of time. All patients experienced known grade 1/2 toxicities, and 10 of 13 patients had at least one grade 3/4 adverse event. No patient tumor could be scored as a Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors response, although the growth rate on therapy compared with that prior to starting axitinib was reduced in 4 of the 13 patients. The median progression-free survival was 5.48 months, and the median overall survival was longer than 13.7 months. CONCLUSION: Axitinib has limited effectiveness in ACC. Together with 48 patients previously reported who received either sorafenib or sunitinib, a total of 61 ACC patients have now been treated with a VEGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor without an objective Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors response. Future trials in ACC should look to other targets for possible active agents.
PURPOSE: To identify biomarkers and gene expression profile signatures to distinguish patients with partial response (PR) from those with stable disease (SD) and progressive disease (PD). EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Twenty patients with inflammatory breast cancer and one patient with locally advanced breast cancer received one cycle of bevacizumab followed by six cycles of bevacizumab plus docetaxel-doxorubicin before surgery. Baseline angiogenic/tumor markers were examined by immunohistochemistry and gene expression profiles were measured by Agilent Whole Human Genome arrays. All were assessed for clinical response. RESULTS: Fourteen patients (67%, 95% confidence interval, 43-85.4%) had PR, five had SD, and two had PD. Expression of CD31 and platelet-derived growth factor receptor-beta (PDGFR-beta) in the tumor vasculature by immunohistochemistry was significantly associated with response (PR versus SD/PD; CD31 median, 33.5 versus 13.2; P = 0.0004; PDGFR-beta median, 5.9 versus 0.6; P = 0.01). Tumor VEGF-A showed a trend towards association with response (2.65 versus 0.25; P = 0.04). pVEGFR2(Y996), pVEGFR2(Y951), MVD, Ki67, apoptosis, grade, ER, HER-2/neu, and p53 were not associated with response. Twenty-six of 1,339 Gene Ontology (GO) classes at the gene transcriptional level were differentially expressed between patients with PR and SD/PD (P < 0.005). Representative significant GO classes include spindle (11 genes; P = 0.001), vascular endothelial growth factor receptor activity including PDGFR-beta (5 genes; P = 0.002), and cell motility including CD31 (80 genes; P = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Baseline CD31, PDGFR-beta, and GO classes for vascular endothelial growth factor receptor activity and mitosis were significantly associated with response to bevacizumab followed by bevacizumab plus chemotherapy.
Abstract Role of DNA damage and demethylation on anticancer activity of DNA methyltransferase inhibitors (DNMTi) remains undefined. We report the effects of DNMT1 gene deletion/disruption ( DNMT1 −/− ) on anticancer activity of a class of DNMTi in vitro, in vivo and in human cancers. The gene deletion markedly attenuated cytotoxicity and growth inhibition mediated by decitabine, azacitidine and 5-aza-4′-thio-2′-deoxycytidine (aza-T-dCyd) in colon and breast cancer cells. The drugs induced DNA damage that concurred with DNMT1 inhibition, subsequent G 2 /M cell-cycle arrest and apoptosis, and upregulated p21 in DNMT1 + / + versus DNMT1 −/− status, with aza-T-dCyd the most potent. Tumor growth and DNMT1 were significantly inhibited, and p21 was upmodulated in mice bearing HCT116 DNMT1 +/+ xenograft and bladder PDX tumors. DNMT1 gene deletion occurred in ~ 9% human colon cancers and other cancer types at varying degrees. Decitabine and azacitidine demethylated CDKN2A / CDKN2B genes in DNMT1 + / + and DNMT1 −/− conditions and increased histone-H3 acetylation with re-expression of p16 INK4A /p15 INK4B in DNMT1 −/− state. Thus, DNMT1 deletion confers resistance to DNMTi, and their anti-cancer activity is determined by DNA damage effects. Patients with DNMT1 gene deletions may not respond to DNMTi treatment.
PURPOSE: We tested the hypothesis that Akt-Ser473 phosphorylation (pAkt) predicts benefit from the sequential addition of paclitaxel to adjuvant doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide (AC) chemotherapy in patients with node-positive breast cancer participating in the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) B-28 trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Primary tumors from the NSABP B-28 trial tissue microarray were available from 1,581 of 3,060 patients who were randomly assigned to receive either four cycles of AC alone or followed by four cycles of paclitaxel. Immunohistochemistry and quantitative analysis of pAkt were performed at the National Cancer Institute blinded to clinical outcome. Association between pAkt and clinical outcome was assessed using multivariate Cox modeling adjusting for age, tumor size, number of positive nodes, tumor grade, estrogen receptor status, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 status. RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 9.1 years, there were no differences in disease-free survival (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 1.02; P = .81) or overall survival (HR, 0.97; P = .80) with and without receiving paclitaxel among 975 patients with pAkt-negative tumors. In 606 patients with pAkt-positive tumors, the sequential addition of paclitaxel resulted in a 26% improvement in disease-free survival (HR, 0.74; P = .02) or a 20% improvement in overall survival (HR, 0.80; P = .17). CONCLUSION: pAkt significantly predicts disease-free benefit from the sequential addition of paclitaxel to AC chemotherapy in patients with node-positive breast cancer. Patients with pAkt-negative breast tumors do not appear to benefit from the addition of paclitaxel.