K. Hacène

We did a multivariate analysis of 1262 patients with operable, invasive ductal breast carcinoma to assess the prognostic value of the Scarff-Bloom-Richardson (SBR) histologic grading system. Nodal metastasis and SBR were the two most important factors for metastasis-free survival (MFS), P = 10-9 and P = 10-5, respectively, for total study time. In patients who were node negative, the SBR and International Union Against Cancer (UICC) stages were the most important for MFS (P = 4 X 10-4 and P = 0.03). In order to try to improve the SBR prognostic value, we first studied the three components of the SBR separately: ductoglandular differentiation proved the least predictive and nuclear pleomorphism and mitotic index the most predictive. A rearrangement of the two nuclear scores alone produced higher risk values and better risk separation of patient subpopulations than SBR, and eliminated the SBR from the multivariate model. This rearrangement, modified SBR (MSBR), defined five new risk subgroups with statistically different risk ratios for MFS (P = 3 X 10-8). SBR grade II (55% of patients) was separated into three MSBR groups significantly different according to MFS (P = 0.008). In the patients who were node negative, MSBR replaced the SBR and was the most important factor for prediction of relapse of MFS (P less than 0.00001). The MSBR is more accurate and predictive than the standard SBR grade and is particularly useful when the nodal status of the patient is negative or unknown.

PURPOSE: To identify most significant and therapeutically relevant prognostic factors in adults with localized primary synovial sarcomas (SS) and to confirm the usefulness of the French Federation of Cancer Centers (FNCLCC) grading system, the prognostic impact of which has been already proven in soft tissue sarcomas. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data on 128 patients with nonmetastatic SS collected from a cooperative database by the FNCLCC Sarcoma Group between 1980 and 1994 were studied retrospectively. Immunohistochemistry was performed at diagnosis in 77 cases (61%). The tumors were classified as biphasic (n = 45), monophasic fibrous (n = 72), and poorly differentiated (n = 10) subtypes. Histologic grade was determined according to the FNCLCC method, and vascular invasion was assessed in every case. RESULTS: The 5-year disease-specific survival (DSS) rate for this series of patients with localized SS was 62.9% (+/- 9.6% [SD]) with a median follow-up time of 37 months (range, 8 to 141 months). In multivariate analysis, the adverse risk factors associated with decreased DSS were International Union Against Cancer/American Joint Committee on Cancer stage III/IVA disease, male sex, and truncal tumor locations. For metastasis-free survival (MFS), disease stage III/IVA, tumor necrosis, and monophasic subtypes were the major factors associated with a less favorable prognosis. Separately, when not using disease stage, tumor necrosis, and mitotic activity, histologic grade became the most significant prognostic factor for both DSS and MFS. In addition, larger tumors and older patients become associated with a significantly worse prognosis. Independent adverse risk factors for local recurrence-free survival included histologic grade 3 and truncal tumor location. CONCLUSION: These data confirm that not all SS present the same severe outcome. High-risk patients identified on the basis of these parameters may qualify for an aggressive treatment approach.

BACKGROUND: Clinical studies have shown that a marked lymphoplasmocytic reaction in breast tumors is associated with poor prognosis. Such findings raise the possibility that an inflammatory cell reaction might be a tumor-induced response that tends to promote tumor growth. PURPOSE: We assessed the expression of colony-stimulating factor-1 (CSF-1) as well as the prevalence of specific tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and monocytes in breast tumors. METHODS: Tissue sections were obtained from archival paraffin blocks from 196 breast cancer patients. Seventy-eight percent of the women had been treated by mastectomy and 22% by lumpectomy. Median age of the patients was 54 years, and median follow-up was 7.3 years. Immunohistochemical and in situ hybridization techniques were used to characterize the specimens. RESULTS: Markedly high numbers of CD45RO-positive T- and L26-positive B-cell infiltrates were found in 13% and 17% of the tissue specimens, respectively. CSF-1 receptor-positive monocytes were detected in 48% and CD68-positive monocytes in 90% of the tumors. In turn, tumors with large fractions of CD68-positive monocytes also showed CSF-1 receptor-positive monocytes (P < .0001). CSF-1 was expressed significantly in 74% of the tumors and the CSF-1 receptor in more than 50% of the tumors. Tumors with high percentages of CSF-1 expressing cells also had marked monocyte infiltrates (P = .035). The presence of marked CD45RO-positive T-cell infiltrates and apparent nuclear staining of CSF-1 in tumor cells were associated with the more frequent occurrence of metastases (P = .02 and P = .04, respectively) and with poor survival (P = .02 and P = .03, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Large numbers of CD45RO-positive (activated memory but noncytotoxic) T cells as well as a predominant nuclear staining pattern for CSF-1 are associated with a poor outcome in breast cancer patients. IMPLICATIONS: Nuclear retention of CSF-1 could reflect CSF-1 turnover and function in tumor cells, but new approaches are needed to establish the significance of these observations. Secreted CSF-1 appears to cause monocyte recruitment and activation, thereby modulating immune functions and potentially the expression of the CD45RO phenotype in T cells.

BACKGROUND: Cell proliferation is a major determinant of the biologic behavior of breast carcinoma. MIB-1 monoclonal antibody is a promising tool for determining cell proliferation on routine histologic material. The objectives of this study were to compare MIB-1 evaluation to other methods of measuring cell proliferation, with a view to refining the cutoff used to classify tumors with low and high proliferation rates in therapeutic trials. METHODS: One hundred eighty-five invasive breast carcinomas were evaluated for cell proliferation by determining monoclonal antibody MIB-1 staining, histologic parameters (Scarff-Bloom-Richardson grade and mitotic index) on paraffin sections, S-phase fraction (SPF) by flow cytometry, and thymidine-kinase (TK) content of frozen samples. RESULTS: There was a high correlation (P = 0.0001) between the percentage of MIB-1 positive tumor cells and SPF, TK, histologic grade, and the mitotic index. Multivariate analyses including MIB-1 at 5 different cutoffs (10%, 15%, 17% [median], 20%, 25%) and the other proliferative markers showed that the optimal MIB-1 cutoff was 25% and that the mitotic index was the proliferative variable that best discriminated between low and high MIB-1 samples. A MIB-1 cutoff of 25% adequately identified highly proliferative tumors. Conversely, with a MIB-1 cutoff of 10%, few tumors with low proliferation were misclassified. CONCLUSIONS: The choice of MIB-1 cutoff depends on the following clinical objective: if MIB-1 is used to exclude patients with slowly proliferating tumors from chemotherapeutic protocols, a cutoff of 10% will help to avoid overtreatment. In contrast, if MIB-1 is used to identify patients sensitive to chemotherapy protocols, it is preferable to set the cutoff at 25%. The MIB-1 index should be combined with some other routinely used proliferative markers, such as the mitotic index.