INDUCTION VERSUS NONINDUCTION IN RENAL TRANSPLANT RECIPIENTS WITH TACROLIMUS-BASED IMMUNOSUPPRESSION1BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of induction treatment with antithymocyte globulins (ATG) followed by tacrolimus therapy with immediate tacrolimus therapy in renal transplant recipients. METHODS: This 12-month, open, prospective study was conducted in 15 centers in France and 1 center in Belgium; 309 patients were randomized to receive either induction therapy with ATG (n=151) followed by initiation of tacrolimus on day 9 or immediate tacrolimus-based triple therapy (n=158). In both study arms, the initial daily tacrolimus dose was 0.2 mg/kg. Steroid boluses were given in the first 2 days and tapered thereafter from 20 mg/day to 5 mg/day. Azathioprine was administered at 1-2 mg/kg per day. RESULTS: At month 12, biopsy-confirmed acute rejections were reported for 15.2% (induction) and 30.4% (noninduction) of patients (P=0.001). The incidence of steroid-sensitive acute rejections was 7.9% (induction) and 22.2% (noninduction)(P=0.001). Steroid-resistant acute rejections were reported for 8.6% (induction) and 8.9% (noninduction) of patients. A total of nine patients died. Patient survival and graft survival at month 12 was similar in both treatment groups (97.4% vs. 96.8% and 92.1% vs. 91.1%, respectively). Statistically significant differences in the incidence of adverse events were found for cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection (induction, 32.5% vs. noninduction, 19.0%, P=0.009), leukopenia (37.3% vs. 9.5%, P<0.001), fever (25.2% vs. 10.1%, P=0.001), herpes simplex (17.9% vs. 5.7%, P=0.001), and thrombocytopenia (11.3% vs. 3.2%, P=0.007). In the induction group, serum sickness was observed in 10.6% of patients. The incidence of new onset diabetes mellitus was 3.4% (induction) and 4.5% (noninduction). CONCLUSION: Low incidences of acute rejection were found in both treatment arms. Induction treatment with ATG has the advantage of a lower incidence of acute rejection, but it significantly increases adverse events, particularly CMV infection.
Sirolimus and Tacrolimus Trough Concentrations and Dose Requirements after Kidney Transplantation in Relation to CYP3A5 and MDR1 Polymorphisms and SteroidsBACKGROUND: CYP3A5 and MDR1 polymorphisms have been shown to influence tacrolimus blood concentrations and dose requirements. The aim is to determine whether these polymorphisms also affect sirolimus trough concentrations and dose requirements after kidney transplantation. METHODS: Eighty-five renal transplant recipients receiving sirolimus were included. Twenty-four were treated with a combined sirolimus-tacrolimus regimen. Eighty-one patients received steroids. Sirolimus and tacrolimus were adjusted to a target therapeutic window. CYP3A5 (intron 3) and MDR1 (exons 12, 21, 26) genotypes were correlated to the adjusted trough concentrations and dose requirements for both sirolimus and tacrolimus. RESULTS: There were no significant correlation between adjusted sirolimus trough concentrations or dose requirements and genetic polymorphisms. In a multiple regression model, adjusted-prednisone dose was involved with a positive or negative effect when considering sirolimus dose requirements or adjusted concentrations, respectively. In the subgroup of patients treated by tacrolimus and sirolimus, adjusted tacrolimus doses were higher in patients carrying at least one CYP3A5 *1 allele (median 0.083 vs. 0.035 mg/kg for CYP3A5*3/*3 patients, P<0.05). Adjusted-prednisolone dose and CYP3A5 polymorphism explained up to 61% of the variability in tacrolimus dose requirements. CONCLUSIONS: Unlike tacrolimus, sirolimus adjusted trough concentrations and dose requirements seem not affected by CYP3A5 and MDR1 polymorphisms. Adjusted-prednisone dose has a significant impact on tacrolimus and sirolimus dose requirements.
Cinacalcet Chloride Is Efficient and Safe in Renal Transplant Recipients with Posttransplant HyperparathyroidismBACKGROUND: Persistent hyperparathyroidism (HPT) is observed in approximately 50% of kidney transplant recipients one year after transplantation. It may result in hypercalcemia, hypophosphatemia, bone demineralization, vascular calcification, lithiasis, and participate in chronic allograft nephropathy. We evaluated the use of the calcimimetic cinacalcet chloride to correct chronic hypercalcemia in posttransplant HPT, in a prospective single-center study. METHODS: Nine patients with persistent hypercalcemia (>2.6 mmol/L) and stable graft function were treated with cinacalcet (30 mg/day, thereafter adapted to obtain normal serum Ca levels) for six months. Their immunosuppressive schedule included mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), steroids, and cyclosporine A (4), tacrolimus (4), or sirolimus (2). RESULTS: Serum Ca levels significantly decreased from 2.75+/-0.15 to 2.59+/-0.10, 2.42+/-0.29 and 2.44+/-0.25 mmol/L by one, two, and six months, respectively (P<0.02, Wilcoxon test for paired data, for all the data points). Parathyroid hormone (PTH) serum levels decreased from 171+/-102 to 134+/-63 pg/ml by two months (P<0.05) and stabilized thereafter (148+/-99 pg/ml at six months; NS). No changes in glomerular filtration rate (49.8+/-18.6 and 51.3+/-19 ml/min at initiation and six months, respectively) and no variation in serum concentration of the immunosuppressive drugs were observed. Three patients withdrew the treatment because gastrointestinal intolerance. CONCLUSION: Cinacalcet allows the correction of hypercalcemia with no interference in immunosuppressive treatment or renal function. However, whether the increased intolerance observed was due to the association of cinacalcet chloride with other drugs required in renal transplantation (e.g., MMF) needs to be assessed.