Alison Smith

In most industrialized countries, screening programs for cervical cancer have shifted from cytology (Pap smear or ThinPrep) alone on clinician-obtained samples to the addition of screening for human papillomavirus (HPV), its main causative agent. For HPV testing, self-sampling instead of clinician-sampling has proven to be equally accurate, in particular for assays that use nucleic acid amplification techniques. In addition, HPV testing of self-collected samples in combination with a follow-up Pap smear in case of a positive result is more effective in detecting precancerous lesions than a Pap smear alone. Self-sampling for HPV testing has already been adopted by some countries, while others have started trials to evaluate its incorporation into national cervical cancer screening programs. Self-sampling may result in more individuals willing to participate in cervical cancer screening, because it removes many of the barriers that prevent women, especially those in low socioeconomic and minority populations, from participating in regular screening programs. Several studies have shown that the majority of women who have been underscreened but who tested HPV-positive in a self-obtained sample will visit a clinic for follow-up diagnosis and management. In addition, a self-collected sample can also be used for vaginal microbiome analysis, which can provide additional information about HPV infection persistence as well as vaginal health in general.

BACKGROUND: Total knee arthroplasty carries major risks, including death. Conventional studies have compared the mortality rate following total knee arthroplasty with standardized mortality ratios or age and sex-matched populations. The purpose of the present study was to compare the mortality rate in a population of patients who were managed with total knee arthroplasty with that in patients who were awaiting surgery. METHODS: All patients undergoing primary total knee arthroplasty from 2000 to 2007 at a single institution were recorded. In the same period, all patients who were added to the waiting list for total knee arthroplasty were recorded. The mortality rate and time to death were calculated, and death certificates were retrieved for those who died within thirty or ninety days after the index event. RESULTS: Two thousand, six hundred and ninety-five patients undergoing primary total knee arthroplasty were used for the thirty-day mortality calculation, and 2527 were used for the ninety-day mortality calculation. These patients were compared with 5857 and 5689 patients who were added to the waiting list for the thirty-day and ninety-day mortality calculations, respectively. There was no difference between the populations in terms of age or sex (p > 0.05). The thirty-day mortality following surgery was significantly greater for the surgery group (0.371%; 95% confidence interval, 0.202% to 0.682%) than for the waiting list group (0.0683%; 95% confidence interval, 0.0266% to 0.1755%) (odds ratio, 5.45; 95% confidence interval, 1.81 to 16.43). The ninety-day mortality was also significantly greater for the surgery group (0.792%; 95% confidence interval, 0.513% to 1.219%) than for the waiting list group (0.387%; 95% confidence interval, 0.256% to 0.585%) (odds ratio, 2.05; 95% confidence interval, 1.13 to 3.74). CONCLUSIONS: Primary total knee arthroplasty is associated with an increased risk of death at thirty and ninety days after the operation when compared with a population awaiting the same procedure. Increasing age was a risk factor for death following total knee arthroplasty.