Epidermal growth factor receptor and labeling index are independent prognostic factors in glial tumor outcome.The aim of this study was to perform a multivariate analysis including clinical and biological prognostic factors on glial tumor outcome. Seventy-nine patients were analyzed (48 men and 31 women; mean age = 56 years, range = 16-77 years): 7 had a benign glial tumor (grades 1 and 2), 21 had an anaplastic glial tumor (grade 3), and 51 had a glioblastoma (grade 4). Median follow-up was 17.9 months for patients who survived (50 patients died). Biopsies were obtained at time of diagnosis (complete tumor resection in 62 patients and stereotaxic biopsies in 17 patients). Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) was measured by a binding assay, and labeling index (LI) was measured by tritiated thymidine incorporation. EGFR varied from 4 to 73,110 fmol/mg protein (mean = 3912 fmol/mg protein; median = 374 fmol/mg protein; n = 79). LI varied between 0.1 and 16.5% (mean = 6.2%; median = 5.2%; n = 40). Log10 EGFR was significantly and positively correlated with patient age. LI was significantly different according to tumor histology. Univariate Cox analysis (end point was cancer death) showed that age (P = 0.027), log10 EGFR (P = 0.025), and LI (P = 0.0019) were significant continuous variables, the survival being shortened when the covariable increased; tumor resection (P = 0.015, relative risk = 0.45) and histology (P = 0.0009) were significant categorical factors. A multivariate Cox analysis (forward selection) including age, histology, tumor resection, log10 EGFR, and LI revealed that log10 EGFR, LI, and tumor resection were the only independent significant predictors of survival. This multivariate approach reveals that the clinical prognostic factors of glial tumors, namely age and tumor histology, disappear, to the benefit of intrinsic characteristics of the tumor, i.e., EGFR expression and LI, suggesting that coupled EGFR and LI determination could be a useful tool for better evaluation of glial tumor outcome.
Search for the optimal schedule for the oxaliplatin/5-fluorouracil association modulated or not by folinic acid: preclinical data.The combination of oxaliplatin (LOHP)-5-fluorouracil (FU)-folinic acid (FA) has provided high response rates in pretreated patients with advanced colorectal cancer that is resistant to FU-FA. However, the choice of the optimal schedule between LOHP, FU, and FA remains open. The purpose of the present study was to compare, at equivalent drug area under the curve, different schedules for the LOHP-FU +/- FA combinations on four human colorectal cancer cell lines. FU +/- FA was tested as a 2-h short exposure ("bolus"), a 118-h continuous exposure ("infusion"), or a 22-h mixed exposure ("De Gramont protocol"). LOHP was administered for 2 h before, during, or after FU +/- FA exposure. Isobologram analyses revealed that LOHP associated with FU +/- FA resulted in synergistic cytotoxic effects whatever the tested schedules (in > or = 75% of cases). For the FU-LOHP combination, cytotoxicity was significantly different according to the FU exposure type (short > mixed > continuous) and was independent of the LOHP position. In contrast, for the FU-FA-LOHP combination, neither the FU exposure type nor the LOHP position significantly influenced cytotoxicity. The presence of FA significantly enhanced the cytotoxicity of FU-LOHP (P < 0.001); this potentiation was independent of the FU exposure type and was significantly influenced by the LOHP position (LOHP after FU-FA > LOHP during FU-FA > LOHP before FU-FA). In conclusion, in contrast with the recognized superiority of continuous FU exposure over short exposure when the drug is given alone, the FU-LOHP combination is more cytotoxic when FU is given as a short exposure. This suggests the potential interest of such a schedule in the clinical setting.
l -Folinic Acid Versus d,l -Folinic Acid in Rescue of High-Dose Methotrexate Therapy in ChildrenM C Etienne, Antoine Thyss, Yves Bertrand et al.|JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute|1992 BACKGROUND: At this time, folinic acid (FA) is commercially available as the racemic mixture d,l-FA, whose biological activity is supported by natural l-FA. The administration of d,l-FA results in the accumulation of d-FA in plasma relative to the active l-FA form; in vitro studies have shown that d-FA can compete with the polyglutamation of methotrexate (MTX). PURPOSE: Our purpose was to compare, on a pharmacokinetic, biological, and clinical basis, the racemic mixture d,l-FA with the pure l-FA in rescue of high-dose MTX therapy (5 g/m2) in children with acute lymphocytic leukemia (ALL). METHODS: Eighteen children with ALL were entered in this trial, which was planned with a crossover design. Four cycles of MTX were administered to each patient, and rescue was achieved orally every 6 hours at a dose of 12 mg/m2 for d,l-FA and 6 mg/m2 for pure l-FA. The d,l-FA and l-FA rescues were alternated from one cycle to the next. d-FA, l-FA, and the active metabolite 5-methyltetrahydrofolate (5-MTHF) were measured in plasma using a stereospecific high-performance liquid chromatography assay. RESULTS: Considering total active folate levels (l-FA + 5-MTHF), mean residual concentrations were similar for rescue by d,l-FA and l-FA, after two and six intakes, respectively: 92 and 186 nM for d,l-FA rescue versus 100 and 184 nM for l-FA rescue. Intra-individual comparison of total active folates (l-FA + 5-MTHF) did not show any significant difference between d,l-FA rescue and l-FA rescue. After administration of d,l-FA, the accumulation of d-FA in plasma was confirmed. For both types of FA rescue, MTX terminal half-lives were identical (average value, 13.9 hours). Considering each type of toxic effect (hematologic, hepatic, renal, and digestive), there was no significant difference in the proportion of toxic cycles following l-FA rescue or d,l-FA rescue. CONCLUSION: The administration of the pure l-FA, compared with the administration of the racemic mixture, results in comparable blood profiles of active folates and MTX, leads to equivalent treatment tolerance, and avoids the plasma accumulation of d-FA.
Analysis of the dinucleotide repeat polymorphism in the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) in tumor and normal tissue of head and neck cancer (HNC) patientsN. Magné, Sandrine Pereira, M C Etienne et al.|Journal of Clinical Oncology|2004 5518 Background: EGFR plays a major role in cell proliferation. EGFR overexpression is strongly associated with poor prognosis in HNC patients. First intron of EGFR gene contains a highly polymorphic microsatellite sequence (9 to 23 CA-repeats) and in vitro transcription declines with increasing number of repeats. We analyzed EGFR gene polymorphism and EGFR expression in tumor (T) and normal mucosa (N) of HNC patients. Methods: T biopsies (initial diagnosis) were taken in 113 patients (mean age 60, 101 men, 12 women; 13 stage II, 21 stage III, 79 stage IV; 53 cancer-related deaths) along with N biopsies for 100 patients. EGFR levels were measured by ligand-binding assay. The microsatellite marker was analyzed by semi-automated fluorescent genotyping. Prognostic values of EGFR genotype and expression on specific survival were analyzed by multivariate Cox regression including performance status and node involvement. Results: Number of CA repeats varied from 13 to 22. Allelic distribution in tumor was trimodal : 49 % 16 CA, 17.5 % 20 CA, 15.5 % 18 CA. A similar pattern was observed in N samples. Heterozygosity was 60 % and 65% in T and N, respectively. In 33% of patients genotype was discordant between T and N, strongly suggesting high EGFR microsatellite instability. There was no relationship between EGFR genotype and EGFR expression (by considering either the shorter allele, the longer, homozygous samples, samples having a common allele, or classifying genotypes as short/long/intermediary defined as 2 alleles<17 vs 2 alleles[tmsnew]63[/tmsnew]17 vs others). Cox analysis confirmed the prognostic significance of T EGFR expression (p = 0.030). T EGFR genotype did not influence survival. A poorer survival was observed in patients with short repeats in normal mucosa (short/long/intermediary, p = 0.040). Patients with EGFR microsatellite instability exhibited significantly shorter survival (p = 0.013). Furthermore, EGFR microsatellite instability (p = 0.003) and T EGFR expression (p = 0.009) were independent significant survival predictors. Conclusion: These promising new findings shed a new light on EGFR implication in HNC. No significant financial relationships to disclose.