A. David Mayer

BACKGROUND: To confirm the results of a number of studies conducted in Europe, the United States, and Japan, this multicenter, randomized trial compared the 12-month efficacy and safety of tacrolimus- and cyclosporine-based immunosuppressive regimens in the prevention of renal allograft rejection. METHODS: A total of 448 renal transplant recipients were recruited from 15 centers and assigned to receive triple-drug therapy consisting of tacrolimus (n=303) or cyclosporine (n=145) in conjunction with azathioprine and low-dose corticosteroids. RESULTS: At 12 months after transplantation, tacrolimus therapy was associated with a significant reduction in the frequency of both acute (tacrolimus 25.9% vs. cyclosporine 45.7%; P<0.001 [absolute difference: 19.8%, 95% confidence interval: 10.0-29.6%]) and corticosteroid-resistant rejection (11.3% vs. 21.6%; P=0.001 [absolute difference: 10.3%, 95% confidence interval: 2.5-18.2%]). Actuarial 1-year patient (tacrolimus 93.0% vs. cyclosporine 96.5%; P=0.140) and graft survival rates (82.5% vs. 86.2%; P=0.380) did not differ significantly between the two treatment groups. Overall, the safety profiles of the tacrolimus- and cyclosporine-based regimens were quite comparable. Infections, renal impairment, neurological complications, and gastrointestinal complaints were frequently reported but were mostly reversible in both groups. Higher incidences of elevated serum creatinine, tremor, diarrhea, hyperglycemia, diabetes mellitus, and angina pectoris were reported in the tacrolimus treatment group, whereas acne, arrhythmia, gingival hyperplasia, and hirsutism were more frequent with cyclosporine treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The significant reduction in the incidence of episodes of allograft rejection observed with tacrolimus therapy may have important long-term implications given the prognostic influence of rejection on graft survival.

We performed a multicenter, randomized, controlled clinical trial of therapeutic peritoneal lavage (2 liters per hour for three days) in 91 patients with severe acute pancreatitis. Patients were entered into the study if severe pancreatitis was indicated by multiple laboratory criteria or diagnostic peritoneal lavage. All patients received full supportive treatment. The median time between the onset of symptoms and randomization was 38 hours. Forty-six patients were assigned to the control group and 45 to the lavage group. There were 13 deaths (28 per cent) and 16 patients with major complications (35 per cent) in the control group, as compared with 12 deaths (27 per cent) and 17 patients with major complications (38 per cent) in the lavage group. Lavage did not appear to modify the length of survival, the incidence of pancreatic collections (pseudocysts or abscesses), or the plasma amylase concentration. Considering the statistical power of the design, we conclude that the outcome of severe pancreatitis was not greatly, if at all, influenced by the regimen of peritoneal lavage used in this study.

BACKGROUND: A prospective, open-label, study was conducted at 29 centers in 9 countries, involving 307 de novo liver transplant patients to compare the clinical usefulness of monitoring 2-hr post-dose cyclosporine (CsA) levels (C2) with conventional trough cyclosporine blood levels (pre-dose) (C0). METHODS: Neoral oral therapy was initiated at 15 mg/kg/day and dose adjusted according to predetermined C2 or C0 target level ranges. The primary efficacy variable was treatment failure at 3 months, where evaluation was based on a composite endpoint of biopsy-proven rejection, treatment for rejection, graft loss, death, or premature withdrawal/discontinuation from the study. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. Graft loss at 12 weeks (retransplantation or death) occurred in 6.8% C2 and in 7.0% C0 patients. Overall incidence of treated acute rejection was lower for C2 (23.6%) than C0 patients (31.6%) (P=0.144, Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel [CMH] test). In hepatitis C virus (HCV)-negative patients, the incidence of rejection in the C2 group was significantly less than in the C0 group (21.2% vs. 33.0%; P<0.05), whereas in HCV-positive patients, the rejection rate was similar in both groups (26.7% for C2 group vs. 27.3% for C0 group: P=0.81). C2 patients (n=16) who reached minimum target CsA levels by day 3 had a notably low incidence of rejection (12.5%), whereas there was no difference in the incidence of rejection in C0 patients, irrespective of time to reach target level. For biopsy-proven acute rejections (21.6% for C2 vs. 30.4% for C0), the incidence of moderate and severe histological diagnosis was significantly lower in the C2 group than in the C0 group (47% vs. 73%; P=0.01). Safety profiles were similar between the two groups, with few patient withdrawals due to adverse events (9.5% for C2; 7.0% for C0). CONCLUSIONS: Using C2 monitoring, the overall incidence of acute cellular rejection was lower compared with the C0 group, and the histological severity of acute rejections was shown to be significantly milder for the C2 group, indicative of good long-term prognosis. These data demonstrate that the use of C2 monitoring is superior to C0 and results in a reduction in the incidence and severity of acute cellular rejection without detrimental effect on the drug safety profile.

BACKGROUND: Patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) may have an increased risk of developing colorectal cancer (CRC) after liver transplantation (LT). We evaluated our patients with PSC after LT to identify risk factors for CRC and its impact on survival. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 152 patients (108 men, 100 with IBD) with PSC who underwent 173 LTs between 1986 and May 2000 were analyzed in three groups: (1) PSC without IBD (n=52); (2) PSC with colectomy (pre-LT and at LT) (n=17, colectomy pre-LT in 13 and simultaneous colectomy at LT in four); and (3) PSC with IBD and an intact colon (n=83). The following factors were studied: age, gender, liver, and renal biochemistry, international normalized ratio, Child-Pugh stage, operative time, blood use, hospital stay, immunosuppression, risk of CRC, retransplantation rate, and mortality. RESULTS: The incidence of CRC after LT was 5.3% (8/152) compared with 0.6% (7/1,184) in non-PSC cases (P<0.001). All CRCs in the PSC group were in patients with IBD and an intact colon. The cumulative risk of developing CRC in the 83 patients with an intact colon and IBD was 14% and 17% after 5 and 10 years, respectively (PSC non-IBD group 0% risk after 10 years, P<0.06). The multivariate analysis showed three significant variables related to the risk of developing CRC: colonic dysplasia after LT (P<0.0003), duration of colitis more than 10 years (P<0.002), and pancolitis (P<0.004). The cause of death in patients with CRC was cancer related in 75% of cases with a reduced 5-year survival of 55% versus 75% without CRC (not significant). CONCLUSION: Patients with PSC undergoing LT with a long history of ulcerative colitis and pancolitis have an increased risk of developing CRC with reduced survival. We advocate long-term aggressive colonic surveillance and colectomy in selected high-risk patients with longstanding severe colitis.