Nobuyuki Kondo

PURPOSE: To investigate the diagnostic performance of circulating tumor cells (CTC) in discrimination between primary lung cancer and nonmalignant diseases as well as in prediction of distant metastasis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We prospectively evaluated CTCs in 7.5-mL samples of peripheral blood sampled from patients with a suspicion or a diagnosis of primary lung cancer. A semiautomated system was used to capture CTCs with an antibody against epithelial cell adhesion molecule. RESULTS: Of 150 eligible patients, 25 were finally diagnosed as having nonmalignant disease, and 125 were diagnosed as having primary lung cancer with (n = 31) or without (n = 94) distant metastasis. CTCs were detected in 30.6% of lung cancer patients and in 12.0% of nonmalignant patients. CTC count was significantly higher in lung cancer patients than in nonmalignant patients, but a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis showed an insufficient capability of the CTC test in discrimination between lung cancer and nonmalignant diseases with an area under ROC curve of 0.598 (95% confidence interval, 0.488-0.708; P = 0.122). Among lung cancer patients, CTC count significantly increased along with tumor progression, especially with development of distant metastasis. The area under ROC curve for CTC count in prediction of distant metastasis was 0.783 (95% confidence interval, 0.679-0.886; P < 0.001). When patients with one or more CTCs were judged as having metastatic disease, sensitivity and specificity of the CTC test were 71.0% and 83.0%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: CTC is a useful surrogate marker of distant metastasis in primary lung cancer.

In the present study, we analyzed genomic alterations of BRCA1-associated protein 1 (BAP1) in 23 malignant mesotheliomas (MMs), 16 epithelioid and seven non-epithelioid, consisting of 18 clinical specimens and five established cell lines. In examining these samples for homozygous deletions and sequence-level mutations, we found biallelic BAP1 gene alterations in 14 of 23 MMs (61%). Seven of these 14 MMs had homozygous deletions of the partial or entire BAP1 gene, another five had sequence-level mutations, including small deletions, a nonsense mutation, and missense mutations with additional monoallelic deletions, and the remaining two had homozygous mutations without allelic loss. All but one of the 14 BAP1 gene mutations were found in the epithelioid-type MMs; BAP1 mutations were found in 13 of 16 epithelioid-type MMs, but in only one of seven non-epithelioid-type MMs (13/16 vs 1/7; P = 0.005). There was no BAP1 mRNA expression in MMs with biallelic deletion and repressed expression was confirmed in MM specimens with deletion/mutation as compared with Met5a, SV40-transformed normal mesothelial cells. Western blot showed that seven of eight epithelioid MMs analyzed were BAP1 negative. Immunostaining with anti-BAP1 antibody in normal lung tissues revealed clear nuclear staining of normal mesothelial cells. No nuclear staining was observed among BAP1 mutation-positive MM tumors, whereas nuclear staining was observed among BAP1 mutation-negative MM tumors. These results suggest that the lack of the tumor suppressor BAP1 may be more specifically involved in the pathogenesis of epithelioid MM rather than non-epithelioid MM, and would be useful for diagnosis of epithelioid-type MM.

OBJECTIVES: Circulating tumour cells (CTCs) are tumour cells shed from a primary tumour and circulate in the peripheral blood after passing through the drainage vein. In previous studies, we showed that high numbers of CTCs were detected in the drainage pulmonary venous blood of most patients with resectable primary lung cancer, whereas only low numbers of CTCs were detected in the peripheral blood of some patients. Accordingly, this prospective study was conducted to assess changes in CTCs in the drainage pulmonary vein (PV) during lung cancer surgery. METHODS: A total of 30 consecutive peripheral-type primary lung cancer patients who underwent lobectomy (or right upper and middle bilobectomy) through open thoracotomy were included. For each patient, 2.5 ml of blood was sampled from the lobar PV of the primary tumour site before and after surgical manipulation for lobectomy. The CTCs were evaluated quantitatively with the CellSearch® system. RESULTS: Before surgical manipulation, CTCs were detected in PV blood in the majority of patients (22 of 30, 73.3%), although CTCs were detected in peripheral blood in only two patients (6.7%). The median number of CTCs in the PV (pvCTC-count) before surgical manipulation was 4.0 cells/2.5 ml, and there was no significant correlation between pvPV-count and any clinicopathological characteristic, including tumour size, progression and histological type. After surgical manipulation, at the time of completion of the lobectomy, the pvCTC-count significantly increased (median, 60.0 cells/2.5 ml; P = 0.001). The increase in pvCTC-count was significantly associated with microscopic lymphatic tumour invasion (ly); pvCTC-count significantly increased in ly-positive patients (pvCTC-count before and after surgical manipulation, 4.0 and 90.5 cells/2.5 ml, respectively; P = 0.006), but not in ly-negative patients (3.5 and 7.0 cells/2.5 ml, respectively; P = 0.153). The increase in pvCTC-count was not significantly associated with any other clinicopathological factor or with any surgical procedure, including the sequence of vessel interruption. CONCLUSIONS: We documented a significant increase in CTC count in drainage PV blood after surgical manipulation, especially in tumours with lymphatic invasion. We are awaiting survival data at 5 year follow-up examination, which may provide clinical significance of the pvCTC-count.