Y

Yipin Lu

Suzhou Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital

Publishes on Computational Drug Discovery Methods, Cancer-related Molecular Pathways, Click Chemistry and Applications. 57 papers and 6.3k citations.

57Publications
6.3kTotal Citations

Is this you? Claim your profile.

Add your photo, update your bio, and get notified when your ranking changes.

Top publicationsby citations

The PDBbind Database:  Collection of Binding Affinities for Protein−Ligand Complexes with Known Three-Dimensional Structures
Renxiao Wang, Xueliang Fang, Yipin Lu et al.|Journal of Medicinal Chemistry|2004
Cited by 1.2k

We have screened the entire Protein Data Bank (Release No. 103, January 2003) and identified 5671 protein-ligand complexes out of 19 621 experimental structures. A systematic examination of the primary references of these entries has led to a collection of binding affinity data (K(d), K(i), and IC(50)) for a total of 1359 complexes. The outcomes of this project have been organized into a Web-accessible database named the PDBbind database.

The PDBbind Database:  Methodologies and Updates
Renxiao Wang, Xueliang Fang, Yipin Lu et al.|Journal of Medicinal Chemistry|2005
Cited by 940

We have developed the PDBbind database to provide a comprehensive collection of binding affinities for the protein-ligand complexes in the Protein Data Bank (PDB). This paper gives a full description of the latest version, i.e., version 2003, which is an update to our recently reported work. Out of 23 790 entries in the PDB release No.107 (January 2004), 5897 entries were identified as protein-ligand complexes that meet our definition. Experimentally determined binding affinities (K(d), K(i), and IC(50)) for 1622 of these were retrieved from the references associated with these complexes. A total of 900 complexes were selected to form a "refined set", which is of particular value as a standard data set for docking and scoring studies. All of the final data, including binding affinity data, reference citations, and processed structural files, have been incorporated into the PDBbind database accessible on-line at http:// www.pdbbind.org/.

Comparative Evaluation of 11 Scoring Functions for Molecular Docking
Renxiao Wang, Yipin Lu, Shaomeng Wang|Journal of Medicinal Chemistry|2003
Cited by 851

Eleven popular scoring functions have been tested on 100 protein-ligand complexes to evaluate their abilities to reproduce experimentally determined structures and binding affinities. They include four scoring functions implemented in the LigFit module in Cerius2 (LigScore, PLP, PMF, and LUDI), four scoring functions implemented in the CScore module in SYBYL (F-Score, G-Score, D-Score, and ChemScore), the scoring function implemented in the AutoDock program, and two stand-alone scoring functions (DrugScore and X-Score). These scoring functions are not tested in the context of a particular docking program. Instead, conformational sampling and scoring are separated into two consecutive steps. First, an exhaustive conformational sampling is performed by using the AutoDock program to generate an ensemble of docked conformations for each ligand molecule. This conformational ensemble is required to cover the entire conformational space as much as possible rather than to focus on a few energy minima. Then, each scoring function is applied to score this conformational ensemble to see if it can identify the experimentally observed conformation from all of the other decoys. Among all of the scoring functions under test, six of them, i.e., PLP, F-Score, LigScore, DrugScore, LUDI, and X-Score, yield success rates higher than the AutoDock scoring function. The success rates of these six scoring functions range from 66% to 76% if using root-mean-square deviation < or =2.0 A as the criterion. Combining any two or three of these six scoring functions into a consensus scoring scheme further improves the success rate to nearly 80% or even higher. However, when applied to reproduce the experimentally determined binding affinities of the 100 protein-ligand complexes, only X-Score, PLP, DrugScore, and G-Score are able to give correlation coefficients over 0.50. All of the 11 scoring functions are further inspected by their abilities to construct a descriptive, funnel-shaped energy surface for protein-ligand complexation. The results indicate that X-Score and DrugScore perform better than the other ones at this aspect.

Structure-Based Design of Spiro-oxindoles as Potent, Specific Small-Molecule Inhibitors of the MDM2−p53 Interaction
Ke Ding, Yipin Lu, Zaneta Nikolovska‐Coleska et al.|Journal of Medicinal Chemistry|2006
Cited by 690Open Access

Potent, specific, non-peptide small-molecule inhibitors of the MDM2-p53 interaction were successfully designed. The most potent inhibitor (MI-63) has a K(i) value of 3 nM binding to MDM2 and greater than 10,000-fold selectivity over Bcl-2/Bcl-xL proteins. MI-63 is highly effective in activation of p53 function and in inhibition of cell growth in cancer cells with wild-type p53 status. MI-63 has excellent specificity over cancer cells with deleted p53 and shows a minimal toxicity to normal cells.

Temporal activation of p53 by a specific MDM2 inhibitor is selectively toxic to tumors and leads to complete tumor growth inhibition
Sanjeev Shangary, Dongguang Qin, Donna McEachern et al.|Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences|2008
Cited by 656Open Access

We have designed MI-219 as a potent, highly selective and orally active small-molecule inhibitor of the MDM2-p53 interaction. MI-219 binds to human MDM2 with a K(i) value of 5 nM and is 10,000-fold selective for MDM2 over MDMX. It disrupts the MDM2-p53 interaction and activates the p53 pathway in cells with wild-type p53, which leads to induction of cell cycle arrest in all cells and selective apoptosis in tumor cells. MI-219 stimulates rapid but transient p53 activation in established tumor xenograft tissues, resulting in inhibition of cell proliferation, induction of apoptosis, and complete tumor growth inhibition. MI-219 activates p53 in normal tissues with minimal p53 accumulation and is not toxic to animals. MI-219 warrants clinical investigation as a new agent for cancer treatment.