Masamiki Miwa

The creatinine (Cr) generation rate reflects the muscle mass, a possible indicator of protein nutritional status. Thus, in this study, we developed equations for calculating the Cr generation rate. Depner and Daugirdas recently developed a method for determining the protein catabolic rate (PCR) from the pre- and postdialysis blood urea nitrogen concentrations. We modified their method to develop equations for calculating the total Cr generation rate from the measured predialysis Cr concentration and estimated postrebound concentration. The total Cr generation rate is defined as the sum of the intrinsic Cr generation rate and the extrinsic Cr generation rate (i.e., the generation rate of Cr derived from food). In the present study, the postrebound Cr concentration was estimated on the basis of postdialysis Cr concentration and the K/V for Cr. The intrinsic Cr generation rate was obtained by subtracting the extrinsic Cr generation rate, which was estimated on the basis of the PCR, from the total Cr generation rate calculated. The intrinsic Cr generation rate determined with this method was virtually the same as that obtained using the postrebound Cr concentration, the concentration immediately before the next hemodialysis (HD) session, and the PCR. The intrinsic Cr generation rate determined with the present method did not vary with changes in the HD prescription (i.e., with an increase in blood flow rate, a prolongation of the HD duration time, or a change in dialyzer membrane area). The present study also indicated that the intrinsic Cr generation rate decreased with age in both males and females.

Push/pull hemodiafiltration (HDF) is characterized by alternate repetition of filtration and backfiltration during hemodialysis with high-flux membrane. In the pressure-controlled push/pull (PC P/P) HDF system, which is the newest push/pull HDF system, there are about 25 repetitions of dilution and concentration of the blood while it passes through the hemodiafilter. Hence, the PC P/P is functionally close to the predilution mode of on-line HDF. In the PC P/P, body fluid is replaced usually by more than 120 L of dialysate during the 4 h treatment. In selecting a hemodiafilter for PC P/P, one must be certain that the blood flow channels in the hemodiafilter do not collapse by the positive pressure on the dialysate side in the backfiltration phase. Thus, the polyacrylonitrile hollow-fiber hemodiafilter and polysulfon hollow-fiber hemodiafilter are suitable for PC P/P. In the short term, PC P/P has been reported to be effective against joint pain, itchiness, insomnia, irritability, and restless leg syndrome experienced by hemodialysis patients. Midterm clinical effectiveness of PC P/P includes the requisite lowering of the erythropoietin dose and improvement in skin pigmentation. The albumin loss per treatment with the PC P/P was significantly lower than that with the conventional HDF approach when a protein-permeable membrane is used. In terms of the removal rate of prolactin, no significant difference was found between PC P/P and conventional HDF. On the other hand, the removal rates of myoglobin and beta2M, where molecular size was smaller than prolactin, was significantly greater with the PC P/P than with conventional HDF.