Xudong Wang

Temperature (T) is probably the most fundamental parameter in all kinds of science. Respective sensors are widely used in daily life. Besides conventional thermometers, optical sensors are considered to be attractive alternatives for sensing and on-line monitoring of T. This Review article focuses on all kinds of luminescent probes and sensors for measurement of T, and summarizes the recent progress in their design and application formats. The introduction covers the importance of optical probes for T, the origin of their T-dependent spectra, and the various detection modes. This is followed by a survey on (a) molecular probes, (b) nanomaterials, and (c) bulk materials for sensing T. This section will be completed by a discussion of (d) polymeric matrices for immobilizing T-sensitive probes and (e) an overview of the various application formats of T-sensors. The review ends with a discussion on the prospects, challenges, and new directions in the design of optical T-sensitive probes and sensors.

We review the current state of optical methods for sensing oxygen. These have become powerful alternatives to electrochemical detection and in the process of replacing the Clark electrode in many fields. The article (with 694 references) is divided into main sections on direct spectroscopic sensing of oxygen, on absorptiometric and luminescent probes, on polymeric matrices and supports, on additives and related materials, on spectroscopic schemes for read-out and imaging, and on sensing formats (such as waveguide sensing, sensor arrays, multiple sensors and nanosensors). We finally discuss future trends and applications and summarize the properties of the most often used indicator probes and polymers. The ESI† (with 385 references) gives a selection of specific applications of such sensors in medicine, biology, marine and geosciences, intracellular sensing, aerodynamics, industry and biotechnology, among others.

Ferroptosis is a recently identified iron‐dependent form of nonapoptotic cell death implicated in brain, kidney, and heart pathology. However, the biological roles of iron and iron metabolism in ferroptosis remain poorly understood. Here, we studied the functional role of iron and iron metabolism in the pathogenesis of ferroptosis. We found that ferric citrate potently induces ferroptosis in murine primary hepatocytes and bone marrow–derived macrophages. Next, we screened for ferroptosis in mice fed a high‐iron diet and in mouse models of hereditary hemochromatosis with iron overload. We found that ferroptosis occurred in mice fed a high‐iron diet and in two knockout mouse lines that develop severe iron overload ( Hjv–/– and Smad4Alb/Alb mice) but not in a third line that develops only mild iron overload ( Hfe –/– mice). Moreover, we found that iron overload–induced liver damage was rescued by the ferroptosis inhibitor ferrostatin‐1. To identify the genes involved in iron‐induced ferroptosis, we performed microarray analyses of iron‐treated bone marrow–derived macrophages. Interestingly, solute carrier family 7, member 11 ( Slc7a11 ), a known ferroptosis‐related gene, was significantly up‐regulated in iron‐treated cells compared with untreated cells. However, genetically deleting Slc7a11 expression was not sufficient to induce ferroptosis in mice. Next, we studied iron‐treated hepatocytes and bone marrow–derived macrophages isolated from Slc7a11–/– mice fed a high‐iron diet. Conclusion: We found that iron treatment induced ferroptosis in Slc7a11–/– cells, indicating that deleting Slc7a11 facilitates the onset of ferroptosis specifically under high‐iron conditions; these results provide compelling evidence that iron plays a key role in triggering Slc7a11‐mediated ferroptosis and suggest that ferroptosis may be a promising target for treating hemochromatosis‐related tissue damage. (H epatology 2017;66:449–465).

The objective of this study was to study the structure and physicochemical properties of biochar derived from apple tree branches (ATBs), whose valorization is crucial for the sustainable development of the apple industry. ATBs were collected from apple orchards located on the Weibei upland of the Loess Plateau and pyrolyzed at 300, 400, 500 and 600 °C (BC300, BC400, BC500 and BC600), respectively. Different analytical techniques were used for the characterization of the different biochars. In particular, proximate and element analyses were performed. Furthermore, the morphological, and textural properties were investigated using scanning electron microscopy (SEM), Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy, Boehm titration and nitrogen manometry. In addition, the thermal stability of biochars was also studied by thermogravimetric analysis. The results indicated that the increasing temperature increased the content of fixed carbon (C), the C content and inorganic minerals (K, P, Fe, Zn, Ca, Mg), while the yield, the content of volatile matter (VM), O and H, cation exchange capacity, and the ratios of O/C and H/C decreased. Comparison between the different samples show that highest pH and ash content were observed in BC500. The number of acidic functional groups decreased as a function of pyrolysis temperature, especially for the carboxylic functional groups. In contrast, a reverse trend was found for the basic functional groups. At a higher temperature, the brunauer–emmett–teller (BET) surface area and pore volume are higher mostly due to the increase of the micropore surface area and micropore volume. In addition, the thermal stability of biochars also increased with the increasing temperature. Hence, pyrolysis temperature has a strong effect on biochar properties, and therefore biochars can be produced by changing pyrolysis temperature in order to better meet their applications.

ADVERTISEMENT RETURN TO ISSUEPREVReviewNEXTFiber-Optic Chemical Sensors and Biosensors (2008–2012)Xu-Dong Wang* and Otto S. Wolfbeis*View Author Information Institute of Analytical Chemistry, Chemo- and Biosensors, University of Regensburg, D-93040 Regensburg, Germany*Tel.: +49 941 943 4065 (X.-D.W.), +49 941 943 4058 (O.S.W.). Fax: +49 941 943 4064 (X.-D.W.). E-mail: [email protected] (X.-D.W.), [email protected] (O.S.W.).Cite this: Anal. Chem. 2013, 85, 2, 487–508Publication Date (Web):November 9, 2012Publication History Published online12 December 2012Published inissue 15 January 2013https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/ac303159bhttps://doi.org/10.1021/ac303159breview-articleACS PublicationsCopyright © 2012 American Chemical SocietyRequest reuse permissionsArticle Views9386Altmetric-Citations417LEARN ABOUT THESE METRICSArticle Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated. Share Add toView InAdd Full Text with ReferenceAdd Description ExportRISCitationCitation and abstractCitation and referencesMore Options Share onFacebookTwitterWechatLinked InRedditEmail Other access optionsGet e-Alertsclose SUBJECTS:Biotechnology,Fibers,Oxygen,Probes,Sensors Get e-Alerts