Development of criteria for the classification and reporting of osteoarthritis: Classification of osteoarthritis of the kneeRoy D. Altman, E. Asch, D. Blöch et al.|Arthritis & Rheumatism|1986 For the purposes of classification, it should be specified whether osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee is of unknown origin (idiopathic, primary) or is related to a known medical condition or event (secondary). Clinical criteria for the classification of idiopathic OA of the knee were developed through a multicenter study group. Comparison diagnoses included rheumatoid arthritis and other painful conditions of the knee, exclusive of referred or para-articular pain. Variables from the medical history, physical examination, laboratory tests, and radiographs were used to develop sets of criteria that serve different investigative purposes. In contrast to prior criteria, these proposed criteria utilize classification trees, or algorithms.
The response of articular cartilage to mechanical injury.H J Mankin|Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery|1982 Articular cartilage: degeneration and osteoarthritis, repair, regeneration, and transplantation.The degeneration of articular cartilage as part of the clinical syndrome of osteoarthritis is one of the most common causes of pain and disability in middle-aged and older people. The strong correlation between increasing age and the prevalence of osteoarthritis, and recent evidence of important age-related changes in the function of chondrocytes, suggest that age-related changes in articular cartilage can contribute to the development and progression of osteoarthritis. Although the mechanisms responsible for osteoarthritis remain poorly understood lifelong moderate use of normal joints does not increase the risk. Thus, the degeneration of normal articular cartilage is not simply the result of aging and mechanical wear. However, high-impact and torsional loads may increase the risk of degeneration of normal joints, and individuals who have an abnormal joint anatomy, joint instability, disturbances of joint or muscle innervation, or inadequate muscle strength or endurance probably have a greater risk of degenerative joint disease. Recent work has shown the potential for the restoration of an articular surface. Currently, surgeons frequently debride joints and penetrate subchondral bone as well as perform osteotomies, with the intent of decreasing symptoms and restoring or maintaining a functional articular surface. The results of these procedures vary considerably among patients. Clinical and experimental work has shown the important influence of loading and motion on the healing of articular cartilage and joints. Experimental studies have revealed that transplantation of chondrocytes and mesenchymal stem cells; use of periosteal and perichondrial grafts, synthetic matrices, and growth factors: and other methods have the potential to stimulate the formation of a new articular surface. The long-term follow-up of small series of patients has shown that the transplantation of osteochondral autologous grafts and allografts can be effective for the treatment of focal defects of articular cartilage in selected patients. Thus far, none of these methods has been shown to predictably restore a durable articular surface to an osteoarthritic joint, and it is unlikely that any one of them will be uniformly successful. Rather, the available clinical and experimental evidence indicates that future optimum methods for the restoration of articular surfaces will begin with a detailed analysis of the structural and functional abnormalities of the involved joint and the patient's expectations for future use of the joint. On the basis of this analysis, the surgeon will develop a treatment plan that potentially combines correction of mechanical abnormalities (including malalignment, instability, and intra-articular causes of mechanical dysfunction), debridement that may or may not include hunted penetration of subchondral bone, and applications of growth factors of implants that may consist of a synthetic matrix that incorporates cells or growth factors or use of transplants followed by a postoperative course of controlled loading and motion.
Instructional Course Lectures, The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons - Articular Cartilage. Part IIJoseph A. Buckwalter, H J Mankin|Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery|1997 BUCKWALTER, J. A. M.D.‡, IOWA CITY, IOWA; MANKIN, H. J. M.D.§, BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS Author Information
Osteoid osteoma: percutaneous radio-frequency ablation.PURPOSE: To evaluate a percutaneous technique for in situ destruction of osteoid osteoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Radio-frequency ablation was performed in 18 patients with osteoid osteoma (17 male, one female; age range, 8-42 years). Diagnosis was established by means of clinical and radiographic features and confirmed by means of needle biopsy findings. No attempt was made to remove the lesion. A small radio-frequency electrode introduced into the lesion through the biopsy track was used to produce thermal necrosis of a 1-cm sphere of tissue. RESULTS: Symptoms were completely relieved in 16 (89%) of 18 patients. In one patient, a second procedure was required for pain relief. All but two patients underwent treatment as outpatients: These two were hospitalized for 1 night only. All patients resumed normal daily activities immediately. No casts or external supports were required; there were no complications. Twelve patients were followed up for more than 1 year. There were no recurrences CONCLUSION: Radio-frequency ablation of osteoid osteoma is a promising alternative to surgery in selected patients.