Melissa Palmer

UNLABELLED: In nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), the extent of hepatocyte apoptosis correlates with disease severity. Reducing hepatocyte apoptosis with the selective caspase inhibitor GS-9450 has a potential for altering the course of the liver disease. In this phase 2, double-blind study, 124 subjects with biopsy-proven NASH were randomized to once-daily placebo or 1, 5, 10, or 40 mg GS-9450 for 4 weeks. Absolute and percent changes from baseline in ALT levels, AST levels, and caspase-3-cleaved cytokeratin (CK)-18 fragments at week 4 were assessed by an analysis of covariance model with adjustment for baseline values. In the 40-mg group, mean (SD) ALT decreased by 47 (43) U/L from baseline to week 4 (P < 0.0001 versus placebo), and the proportion of subjects with normal ALT increased from 0% to 35% at week 4. In the 40-mg group, mean AST decreased by 13 U/L from baseline (not significant), and the proportion with normal AST increased from 20% at baseline to 48% at week 4. By week 4, mean CK-18 fragment levels had decreased to 393 (723) U/L in the GS-9450 10-mg group and 125 (212) U/L in the 40-mg group, but these reductions were not statistically significant. No serious adverse events were reported during treatment, and the percentage of subjects with at least one treatment-emergent grade 3 or 4 laboratory abnormality ranged from 11.5% to 17% across the GS-9450 treatment groups versus 35% in the placebo group. CONCLUSION: GS-9450 treatment induced significant reductions in ALT levels in NASH patients. Reductions in CK-18 fragment levels also occurred, although they were not statistically significant. At appropriate therapeutic indices, selective caspase inhibitors may be a promising treatment option in patients with NASH.

PURPOSE: The steady-state pharmacokinetics of valproate (VPA) and topiramate (TPM) were compared during VPA monotherapy, concomitant VPA and TPM therapy, and TPM monotherapy to evaluate pharmacokinetic interactions. METHODS: After a 3-week baseline period, 12 patients receiving VPA monotherapy (500 to 2,250 mg every 12 h) received TPM at three escalating doses (from 100 to 200 to 400 mg every 12 h), each for 2 weeks. Thereafter, the VPA dose was tapered by 25% weekly. Blood and urine samples were collected over 12-h intervals during VPA monotherapy and at the end of each stage of TPM dose escalation and TPM monotherapy. RESULTS: All patients reached TPM monotherapy, and nine achieved satisfactory seizure control for > or = 2 weeks without VPA. TPM plasma peak concentration (C(max)) and area under the concentration-versus-time curve during a 12-h dosing interval (AUC(0-12)) were slightly higher (17%; n = 8) during TPM monotherapy than during concomitant VPA therapy. TPM oral and renal clearances (n = 8) were 25.9 +/- 4.6 and 11.6 +/- 3.2 ml/min during TPM monotherapy and were 29.8 +/- 4.2 and 12.4 +/- 2.7 ml/min during VPA concomitant therapy. VPA AUC(0-12) decreased (11.3%; n = 10) with the addition of TPM 400 mg every 12 h. VPA oral clearance was 12.8 +/- 4.1 ml/min during monotherapy and was 13.8 +/- 4.0, 14.1 +/- 3.9, and 14.5 +/- 5.2 ml/min during coadministration of TPM 100, 200, and 400 mg every 12 h, respectively. Cognitive dysfunction, observed in some patients receiving high doses of VPA with TPM, reversed or improved with VPA dose reduction and discontinuation. The lower-than-normal prestudy platelet count measured in one patient increased to normal levels when VPA was discontinued. CONCLUSIONS: Because changes in TPM and VPA pharmacokinetics were small, it is unlikely that their concomitant use will have a significant impact on the clinical condition of the patient.

Twenty-eight patients (19 females, 9 males) were evaluated pre- and posttransplant to determine the frequency and find predictors of excessive weight gain after orthotopic liver transplant. Posttransplant, 21 patients gained and 7 patients lost weight as compared with their pretransplant dry weight. The majority of weight gain occurred between 2 and 16 months; 64.3% of patients (18/28 pts.) became overweight. All patients overweight prior to transplant (11 pts.) were more overweight posttransplant (P less than 0.005). Overweight and nonoverweight patients were similar in age, female predominance, etiology of liver disease, hypercholesterolemia, and hypertriglyceridemia pretransplant, as well as diabetes mellitus and medications including prednisone posttransplant. Overweight patients more commonly had a family history of diabetes mellitus, arteriosclerotic heart disease, and hypertension. They also had more hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, hypertriglyceridemia, abnormal physical findings related to the liver, and abnormal results of hepatic tests posttransplant. Mean rate of weight gain for overweight patients compared with nonoverweight ones during the first 16 months after transplant was 1.5 kg/month +/- 0.9 vs 0.4 kg/month +/- 0.4 for those not overweight. After 16 months mean rate of increase was slower for overweight patients (0.3 kg/month +/- 0.3), whereas weight appeared to stabilize in the nonoverweight ones. We conclude that excessive weight gain after liver transplant is common and occurs early. Since obesity may contribute to, as well as be a separate cause, of hepatic abnormalities, confusion may result when interpreting abnormal results of hepatic tests. Obesity prior to transplant predicts excessive weight gain posttransplant, although all patients may be at risk.