H

Helen Cornes

Birmingham Women’s and Children’s NHS Foundation Trust

Publishes on Neonatal Respiratory Health Research, Infant Development and Preterm Care, Emergency and Acute Care Studies. 2 papers and 0 citations.

2Publications
0Total Citations

Is this you? Claim your profile.

Add your photo, update your bio, and get notified when your ranking changes.

Top publicationsby citations

P49 Time to SHINE – simulation to help in neonatal emergencies: a course to improve trainee confidence in neonatal emergency management
Isobel Fullwood, Ashley Holt, Catherine Powell et al.|Poster presentations|2018
Cited by 0

Background A scoping questionnaire for West Midlands Paediatrics trainees was carried out to assess the level of confidence in the management of various neonatal emergency scenarios and revealed that, for example, only 14% of trainees (ST1–7) felt ‘quite confident’ to manage PPHN. The questionnaire also assessed recent opportunities in/exposure to simulation based education in this field. Only 10% had received simulation based education atleast once a month and 81% felt there was not enough neonatal simulation based education. This needs assessment was the driving force to develop the first trainee SHINE course; Simulation to Help In Neonatal Emergencies. Summary of work A one day course comprising of four neonatal emergency scenarios and two workshops was designed by a multi-disciplinary faculty based at Birmingham Women’s Hospital. The course was free to attend for West Midlands trainees and was aimed at registrar or near registrar level trainees who wanted to gain confidence in the management of common neonatal emergencies. The learning objectives were both technical and non-technical. Results The course was attended by six candidates ST3–4 level. 22% of the candidates had not been exposed to four of the scenarios on the course during their training so far. Before attending the course, 50% of the candidates had neutral or low confidence levels in the management of each scenario. After the course confidence levels improved to quite confident or very confident for 100% of the candidates. 100% of the candidates felt the scenarios were very relevant. All candidates felt the learning environment was safe and supportive and all candidates would recommend the course to a colleague. Learning points included both technical and non-technical skills and written feedback included ‘It is so useful that I would make it compulsory’. Discussion The need and demand for simulation based education in neonatal training in the West Midlands was identified and lead to the delivery of a pilot simulation based education course in response. The feedback received was overwhelmingly positive and it is felt this course can play a vital role in standardising exposure to neonatal emergency scenarios for West Midlands trainees and therefore improve confidence when faced with these scenarios during their training. We are running our second course in July 2018.

48 Use of Simulation to Introduce Delivery Room Cuddles as Standard Practice in a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit
Diana Aguirre, Amy Henderson, Helen Cornes et al.|International Journal of Healthcare Simulation|2021
Cited by 0

Background: Kangaroo Mother Care (KMC) was introduced in the 1970s to keep premature babies warm after birth. There has been growing evidence of multiple benefits including physiological autoregulation, reduced stress, positive attachment, enhanced neurocognitive development, breastfeeding and psychological well-being. Delivery Room Cuddles (DRC) was introduced 15 years ago in Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals as an extension of KMC. Other units have since reported the successful introduction of the process [1]. Anecdotally in our Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) parents were not routinely offered skin-to-skin contact with their infant early in their neonatal journey. Aim: The aim of the study was to safely introduce DRC as standard practice in our NICU. Method/design: We obtained feedback on parental and staff experience with DRC. A Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (Figure 1) was then carried out to break down the DRC process into steps, highlight potential risks and mitigation strategies. Information was synthesized into a standard operating procedure (SOP) and checklist. The use of a transport incubator to mobilize premature infants was not common practice in our NICU at the start of the project; therefore, a parallel SOP was developed for this. Staff training was then carried out using a video simulation and workshops. DRC was formally introduced in April 2021 (Figure 1). Figure 1: FMEA Implementation outline: Before implementation, 54 medical and nursing staff completed the survey, rating statements on confidence from 1 ‘strongly disagree’ to 5 ‘strongly agree’. Confidence was higher in non-intubated infants 32–34 weeks’ gestation (33/54 rated 5) and lowest in intubated infants <27 weeks’ gestation (10/54 rated 5). Staff reported anxieties around equipment failure, delaying care and adverse events. Thirty-nine parents completed the questionnaire. Thirty-four babies were born locally. Only five babies had DRC, of which four had no respiratory support. Time to first skin-to-skin contact ranged from 2 hours to 17 days (mean of 5 days). DRC is becoming routine practice in our NICU with no adverse events to date. Anecdotally staff and parents report great satisfaction with DRC, although formal outcome assessment is outstanding. Introducing DRC is feasible with adequate process planning and staff training using video simulation and workshops. DRC is cherished by families, rewarding for staff and sets infants up for a positive start in the neonatal journey. With examples of successful DRC practice and emerging safety outcome data, DRC is likely to become routine practice. Using this model of process design and training, other units will also be able to safely introduce DRC.