D

David R. Haynor

Seattle Pacific University

ORCID: 0000-0002-8940-7426

Publishes on Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications, Medical Image Segmentation Techniques, Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging. 266 papers and 16.5k citations.

266Publications
16.5kTotal Citations

Is this you? Claim your profile.

Add your photo, update your bio, and get notified when your ranking changes.

Top publicationsby citations

PET-CT image registration in the chest using free-form deformations
David Mattes, David R. Haynor, Hubert Vesselle et al.|IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging|2003
Cited by 875

We have implemented and validated an algorithm for three-dimensional positron emission tomography transmission-to-computed tomography registration in the chest, using mutual information as a similarity criterion. Inherent differences in the two imaging protocols produce significant nonrigid motion between the two acquisitions. A rigid body deformation combined with localized cubic B-splines is used to capture this motion. The deformation is defined on a regular grid and is parameterized by potentially several thousand coefficients. Together with a spline-based continuous representation of images and Parzen histogram estimates, our deformation model allows closed-form expressions for the criterion and its gradient. A limited-memory quasi-Newton optimization algorithm is used in a hierarchical multiresolution framework to automatically align the images. To characterize the performance of the method, 27 scans from patients involved in routine lung cancer staging were used in a validation study. The registrations were assessed visually by two expert observers in specific anatomic locations using a split window validation technique. The visually reported errors are in the 0- to 6-mm range and the average computation time is 100 min on a moderate-performance workstation.

Validating clustering for gene expression data
Cited by 722Open Access

Abstract Motivation: Many clustering algorithms have been proposed for the analysis of gene expression data, but little guidance is available to help choose among them. We provide a systematic framework for assessing the results of clustering algorithms. Clustering algorithms attempt to partition the genes into groups exhibiting similar patterns of variation in expression level. Our methodology is to apply a clustering algorithm to the data from all but one experimental condition. The remaining condition is used to assess the predictive power of the resulting clusters—meaningful clusters should exhibit less variation in the remaining condition than clusters formed by chance. Results: We successfully applied our methodology to compare six clustering algorithms on four gene expression data sets. We found our quantitative measures of cluster quality to be positively correlated with external standards of cluster quality. Availability: The software is under development. Contact: kayee@cs.washington.edu Supplementary information: http://www.cs.washington.edu/homes/kayee/cluster or http://www.cs.washington.edu/homes/ruzzo/cluster * To whom correspondence should be addressed.