I

Imke Schröder

University of California, Los Angeles

Publishes on Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology, Chemical Safety and Risk Management, Photosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms. 78 papers and 4.9k citations.

78Publications
4.9kTotal Citations

Is this you? Claim your profile.

Add your photo, update your bio, and get notified when your ranking changes.

Top publicationsby citations

EcoCyc: fusing model organism databases with systems biology
Ingrid M. Keseler, Amanda Mackie, Martín Peralta-Gil et al.|Nucleic Acids Research|2012
Cited by 564Open Access

EcoCyc (http://EcoCyc.org) is a model organism database built on the genome sequence of Escherichia coli K-12 MG1655. Expert manual curation of the functions of individual E. coli gene products in EcoCyc has been based on information found in the experimental literature for E. coli K-12-derived strains. Updates to EcoCyc content continue to improve the comprehensive picture of E. coli biology. The utility of EcoCyc is enhanced by new tools available on the EcoCyc web site, and the development of EcoCyc as a teaching tool is increasing the impact of the knowledge collected in EcoCyc.

Nitric Oxide in Biological Denitrification:  Fe/Cu Metalloenzyme and Metal Complex NO<i><sub>x</sub></i> Redox Chemistry
Cited by 474

ADVERTISEMENT RETURN TO ISSUEPREVArticleNEXTNitric Oxide in Biological Denitrification: Fe/Cu Metalloenzyme and Metal Complex NOx Redox ChemistryIan M. Wasser, Simon de Vries, Pierre Moënne-Loccoz, Imke Schröder, and Kenneth D. KarlinView Author Information Department of Chemistry, The Johns Hopkins University, Charles and 34th Streets, Baltimore, Maryland 21218, Kluyver Laboratory for Biotechnology, Delft University of Technology, 2628 BC Delft, The Netherlands, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, OGI School of Science and Engineering at OHSU, Beaverton, Oregon 97006, and Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, University of California, Los Angeles, California 90095 Cite this: Chem. Rev. 2002, 102, 4, 1201–1234Publication Date (Web):March 22, 2002Publication History Received10 July 2001Published online22 March 2002Published inissue 1 April 2002https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/cr0006627https://doi.org/10.1021/cr0006627research-articleACS PublicationsCopyright © 2002 American Chemical SocietyRequest reuse permissionsArticle Views5759Altmetric-Citations417LEARN ABOUT THESE METRICSArticle Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated. Share Add toView InAdd Full Text with ReferenceAdd Description ExportRISCitationCitation and abstractCitation and referencesMore Options Share onFacebookTwitterWechatLinked InRedditEmail Other access optionsGet e-Alertsclose SUBJECTS:Anions,Bioinorganic chemistry,Ligands,Oxides,Peptides and proteins Get e-Alerts

Microbial ferric iron reductases
Imke Schröder, Eric F. Johnson, Simon de Vries|FEMS Microbiology Reviews|2003
Cited by 320Open Access

Almost all organisms require iron for enzymes involved in essential cellular reactions. Aerobic microbes living at neutral or alkaline pH encounter poor iron availability due to the insolubility of ferric iron. Assimilatory ferric reductases are essential components of the iron assimilatory pathway that generate the more soluble ferrous iron, which is then incorporated into cellular proteins. Dissimilatory ferric reductases are essential terminal reductases of the iron respiratory pathway in iron-reducing bacteria. While our understanding of dissimilatory ferric reductases is still limited, it is clear that these enzymes are distinct from the assimilatory-type ferric reductases. Research over the last 10 years has revealed that most bacterial assimilatory ferric reductases are flavin reductases, which can serve several physiological roles. This article reviews the physiological function and structure of assimilatory and dissimilatory ferric reductases present in the Bacteria, Archaea and Yeast. Ferric reductases do not form a single family, but appear to be distinct enzymes suggesting that several independent strategies for iron reduction may have evolved.

Structure of the <i>Escherichia coli</i> Response Regulator NarL<sup>,</sup>
Cited by 311

The crystal structure analysis of the NarL protein provides a first look at interactions between receiver and effector domains of a full-length bacterial response regulator. The N-terminal receiver domain, with 131 amino acids, is folded into a 5-strand beta sheet flanked by 5 alpha helices, as seen in CheY and in the N-terminal domain of NTRC. The C-terminal DNA-binding domain, with 62 amino acids, is a compact bundle of 4 alpha helices, of which the middle 2 form a helix-turn-helix motif closely related to that of Drosophila paired protein and other H-T-H DNA-binding proteins. The 2 domains are connected by an alpha helix of 10 amino acids and a 13-residue flexible tether that is not visible and presumably disordered in the X-ray structure. In this unphosphorylated form of NarL, the C-terminal domain is turned against the receiver domain in a manner that would preclude DNA binding. Activation of NarL via phosphorylation of Asp59 must involve transfer of information to the interdomain interface and either rotation or displacement of the DNA-binding C-terminal domain. Docking of a B-DNA duplex against the isolated C-terminal domain in the manner observed in paired protein and other H-T-H proteins suggests a stereochemical basis for DNA sequence preference: T-R-C-C-Y (high affinity) or T-R-C-T-N (low affinity), which is close to the experimentally observed consensus sequence: T-A-C-Y-N. The NarL structure is a model for other members of the FixJ or LuxR family of bacterial transcriptional activators, and possibly to the more distant OmpR and NtrC families as well.