Marija Matić

Multifunctional enzymes glutathione transferases (GSTs) are involved in the development of chemoresistance, thus representing a promising target for a novel approach in cancer treatment. This superfamily of polymorphic enzymes exhibits extraordinary substrate promiscuity responsible for detoxification of numerous conventional chemotherapeutics, at the same time regulating signaling pathways involved in cell proliferation and apoptosis. In addition to upregulated GST expression, different cancer cell types have a unique GST signature, enabling targeted selectivity for isoenzyme specific inhibitors and pro-drugs. As a result of extensive research, certain GST inhibitors are already tested in clinical trials. Catalytic properties of GST isoenzymes are also exploited in bio-activation of specific pro-drugs, enabling their targeted accumulation in cancer cells with upregulated expression of the appropriate GST isoenzyme. Moreover, the latest approach to increase specificity in treatment of solid tumors is development of GST pro-drugs that are derivatives of conventional anti-cancer drugs. A future perspective is based on the design of new drugs, which would selectively target GST overexpressing cancers more prone to developing chemoresistance, while decreasing side effects in off-target cells.

BACKGROUND: Increased oxidative stress is a hallmark of end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Glutathione S-transferases (GST) are involved in the detoxification of xenobiotics and protection of oxidative damage. We hypothesized that genetic polymorphism in antioxidant enzymes GSTA1, GSTM1, GSTP1 and GSTT1 is more frequent in ESRD and modulates the degree of oxidative stress in these patients. METHODS: GSTA1, GSTM1, GSTP1 and GSTT1 genotypes were determined in 199 ESRD patients and 199 age- and gender-matched controls. Markers of protein and lipid oxidative damage [thiol groups, carbonyl groups, advanced oxidative protein products, nitrotyrosine, malondialdehyde (MDA) and MDA adducts], together with total oxidant status and pro-oxidant-antioxidant balance were determined. RESULTS: Individual GST polymorphisms influence vulnerability to both protein and lipid oxidation, with GSTM1-null gene variant having the most pronounced effect. Furthermore, a strong combined effect of null/low-activity GSTM1, GSTT1, GSTA1 and GSTP1 genotypes in terms of susceptibility towards oxidative and carbonyl stress was found in ESRD patients. When patients were stratified according to GSTM1 and GSTT1, the highest oxidant damage was noted in those with the GSTM1-null/GSTT1-null genotype. The observed effect was even stronger in patients with the third low-activity GSTP1 or GSTA1 genotype. Finally, the level of oxidative and carbonyl stress was most pronounced in the subgroup of patients with all four null or low-activity GSTM1, GSTT1, GSTP1 and GSTA1 genotypes. CONCLUSIONS: According to the GST genotype, ESRD patients may be stratified in terms of the level of oxidative and carbonyl stress that might influence cardiovascular prognosis, but could also improve efforts towards individualization of antioxidant treatment.