Daniel S. Selness

PURPOSE: The need for greater clarity about the effects of 5-HT(3) receptor antagonists on cardiac repolarization is apparent in the changing product labeling across this therapeutic class. This study assessed the repolarization effects of granisetron, a 5-HT(3) receptor antagonist antiemetic, administered intravenously and by a granisetron transdermal system (GTDS). EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: In a parallel four-arm study, healthy subjects were randomized to receive intravenous granisetron, GTDS, placebo, or oral moxifloxacin (active control). The primary endpoint was difference in change from baseline in mean Fridericia-corrected QT interval (QTcF) between GTDS and placebo (ddQTcF) on days 3 and 5. RESULTS: A total of 240 subjects were enrolled, 60 in each group. Adequate sensitivity for detection of QTc change was shown by a 5.75 ms lower bound of the 90% confidence interval (CI) for moxifloxacin versus placebo at 2 hours postdose on day 3. Day 3 ddQTcF values varied between 0.2 and 1.9 ms for GTDS (maximum upper bound of 90% CI, 6.88 ms), between -1.2 and 1.6 ms for i.v. granisetron (maximum upper bound of 90% CI, 5.86 ms), and between -3.4 and 4.7 ms for moxifloxacin (maximum upper bound of 90% CI, 13.45 ms). Day 5 findings were similar. Pharmacokinetic-ddQTcF modeling showed a minimally positive slope of 0.157 ms/(ng/mL), but a very low correlation (r = 0.090). CONCLUSION: GTDS was not associated with statistically or clinically significant effects on QTcF or other electrocardiographic variables. This study provides useful clarification on the effect of granisetron delivered by GTDS on cardiac repolarization.

Moxifloxacin is used in thorough QT studies to assess sensitivity for detection of an increase in QTc. Moxifloxacin is usually over-encapsulated for blinding. However, there is concern that over-encapsulation alters its pharmacokinetics. In a 4-arm, randomized crossover study, 22 volunteers received over-encapsulated moxifloxacin, over-encapsulated placebo, bare moxifloxacin, and intravenous (IV) moxifloxacin. Placebo capsules and IV infusions were administered so that treatments in each arm, except for bare moxifloxacin, were indistinguishable. Pharmacokinetics of the oral treatments were found to be nearly identical and to meet Food and Drug Administration criteria for bioequivalency. Relative to the IV infusion administered over 1 hour, the tablet formulation was bioequivalent to total exposure but not peak exposure maximum plasma concentration, which was lower by 22%. Median time to maximum plasma concentration of the IV infusion was 1.00 hour. A 2-compartment model with oral absorption and linear elimination adequately described the observed moxifloxacin data. Changes in QTcF mirrored the pharmacokinetic changes, and there was a linear relationship between plasma concentration of moxifloxacin and change in QTcF. A 2-stage infusion scheme for IV moxifloxacin mimics the oral plasma concentration versus time curve. Over-encapsulation of moxifloxacin did not alter its peak or total systemic exposures or pharmacodynamics after oral administration.