Peter J. Bostick

PURPOSE: This study was performed to evaluate the potential of specific mRNA markers to detect micrometastases by reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and Southern blot analysis of sentinel lymph nodes (SNs) and blood from patients with breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We assessed the specificity of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), cytokeratin-19 (CK-19), CK-20, gastrointestinal tumor-associated antigen-733.2 (GA733.2), and mucin-1 (MUC-1) in the blood of healthy donors (n = 13) and lymph nodes from patients without cancer (n = 3) by RT-PCR assay. The sensitivity of the RT-PCR assay for the target mRNA markers was assessed in breast cancer cell lines (n = 4), primary breast tumors (n = 8), and the frozen sections of SNs (n = 22) from 22 patients with American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stages I to IIIA breast cancer. RESULTS: CK-20 was the only mRNA marker not detected in lymph nodes or blood from patients without cancer. Both the blood and lymph nodes from patients without cancer expressed CEA, CK-19, GA733.2, and MUC-1 mRNA. All four breast cancer cell lines and six of eight primary breast tumors expressed all five mRNA markers. Expression of mRNA by the RT-PCR assay in the frozen-section SNs (n = 12) without metastases by conventional histopathology ranged from 8% (CK-20) to 92% (GA733.2). Detection of RT-PCR cDNA products in frozen-section SNs was increased with Southern blot analysis compared with ethidium bromide gel electrophoresis (EtBr) for all mRNA markers except CK-19. CONCLUSION: CEA, CK-19, GA733.2, and MUC-1 show no diagnostic value as mRNA markers for the detection of micrometastases by the RT-PCR assay because they are expressed in the blood and lymph nodes of patients without cancer. Further studies are needed to assess the sensitivity of CK-20 to detect micrometastases by the RT-PCR assay in the blood and frozen-section SNs of patients with breast cancer.

PURPOSE: Detection of micrometastases in the regional tumor-draining lymph nodes is critical for accurate staging and prognosis in melanoma patients. We hypothesized that a multiple-mRNA marker (MM) reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assay would improve the detection of occult metastases in the sentinel node (SN), compared with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining and immunohistochemistry (IHC), and that MM expression is predictive of disease relapse. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Seventy-two consecutive patients with clinical early-stage melanoma underwent sentinel lymphadenectomy (SLND). Their SNs were serially sectioned and assessed for MAGE-3, MART-1, and tyrosinase mRNA expression by RT-PCR, in parallel with H&E staining and IHC, for melanoma metastases. MM expression in the SNs was correlated with H&E and IHC assay results, standard prognostic factors, and disease-free survival. RESULTS: In 17 patients with H&E- and/or IHC-positive SNs, 16 (94%) expressed two or more mRNA markers. Twenty (36%) of 55 patients with histopathologically negative SNs expressed two or more mRNA markers. By multivariate analysis, patients at increased risk of metastases to the SN had thicker lesions (P =.03), were 60 years of age or younger (P <.05), and/or were MM-positive (P <.001). Patients with histopathologically melanoma-free SNs who were MM-positive, compared with those who were positive for one or fewer mRNA markers, were at increased risk of recurrence (P =.02). Patients who were MM-positive with histopathologically proven metastases in the SN were at greatest risk of disease relapse (P =. 01). CONCLUSION: H&E staining and IHC underestimate the true incidence of melanoma metastases. MM expression in the SN more accurately reflects melanoma micrometastases and is also a more powerful predictor of disease relapse than are H&E staining and IHC alone.

PURPOSE: Regional lymph node involvement is the most important prognostic indicator in patients with solid tumors. Conventional lymph node dissection has not been shown to affect survival and is often associated with considerable morbidity. Intraoperative lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymph node dissection were therefore designed as a minimally invasive alternative to routine elective lymph node dissection in patients with primary cutaneous melanoma. This study examined whether introperative lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymph node dissection were accurate in staging patients with other solid malignancies. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 1985 and 1998, 107 patients with breast cancer, 17 with thyroid tumors, 14 with gastrointestinal/gynecologic cancers, six with Merkel cell cancers, and five with squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck have undergone mapping and sentinel lymph node dissection at the John Wayne Cancer Institute. RESULTS: The sentinel node was identified in 96% of patients (98% melanoma). In 36% of patients the sentinel node was the only tumor-positive node (71% melanoma). Eighteen percent of sentinel nodes were negative by hematoxylin and eosin staining but were positive by immunohistochemical staining (15% melanoma). CONCLUSION: These data suggest that many solid neoplasms have a primary lymphatic channel and lymph node to which it drains. Although sentinel lymph node dissection has been popularized in melanoma therapy, we have found it feasible for treatment of other solid malignancies. This technique may ultimately replace conventional dissection with more accurate staging.

Improvement is needed in the ability to evaluate the prognosis of melanoma patients who are clinically disease-free but likely to develop recurrent metastatic disease. The detection of circulating melanoma cells in blood is a potential surrogate marker of subclinical residual disease. We assessed the prognostic clinical utility of a multimarker melanoma reverse transcriptase-PCR (RT-PCR) assay using blood of 46 patients who were clinically disease-free. All patients were followed up for more than 4 years for disease recurrence. There was a significant correlation between number of RT-PCR markers present in blood and American Joint Committee on Cancer stage (P = 0.009). The number of RT-PCR markers detected in blood was an independent prediction factor of disease recurrence in a Cox proportional hazard model (P = 0.02). A risk factor model using American Joint Committee on Cancer stage and number of positive RT-PCR markers significantly predicted disease recurrence in 2, 3, and 4 years of follow-up. These studies demonstrate that molecular detection of circulating melanoma cells may be of significant prognostic value in determining early disease recurrence and may be useful for stratifying patients for adjuvant therapy.

Currently, molecular markers offer the unique opportunity to identify occult metastasis in early stage cancer patients not otherwise detected with conventional staging techniques. To date, well-characterized molecular tumor markers to detect occult breast cancer cells in blood are limited. Because breast tumors are heterogeneous in tumor marker expression, we developed a "multimarker" reverse transcription-PCR assay combined with the highly sensitive electrochemiluminescence automated detection system. Breast cancer cell lines (n = 7), primary breast tumors (n = 25), and blood from normal donors (n = 40) and breast cancer patients [n = 65; American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stages I-IV] were assessed for four mRNA tumor markers: beta-human chorionic gonadotropin (beta-hCG), oncogene receptor (c-Met), beta 1-->4-N-acetylgalactosaminyl-transferase, and a tumor-associated antigen (MAGE-A3). None of the tumor markers were expressed in any normal donor bloods. Breast cancer cell lines and primary breast tumors expressed beta-hCG, c-Met, beta 1-->4-N-acetylgalactosaminyl-transferase, and MAGE-A3 mRNA. Of the 65 breast cancer patient blood samples assessed, 2, 3, 15, 49, and 31% expressed 4, 3, 2, 1, and 0 of the mRNA tumor markers, respectively. At least two markers were expressed in 20% of the blood specimens. The addition of a combination of markers enhanced detection of systemic metastasis by 32%. In patient blood samples, the MAGE-A3 marker correlated significantly with tumor size (P = 0.0004) and AJCC stage (P = 0.007). The combination of beta-hCG and MAGE-A3 mRNA markers correlated significantly with tumor size (P = 0.04), and the marker combination c-Met and MAGE-A3 showed a significant correlation with tumor size (P = 0.005) as well as AJCC stage (P = 0.018). A multimarker reverse transcription-PCR assay that correlates with known clinicopathological prognostic parameters may have potential clinical utility by monitoring tumor progression with a blood test.