Madeline Walsh

BACKGROUND: Healthcare-focused hackathons are 48-hour platforms intended to accelerate novel medical technology. However, debate exists about how much they contribute to medical technology innovation. The Consortium for Affordable Medical Technologies (CAMTech) has developed a three-pronged model to maximise their effectiveness. To gauge the success of this model, we examined follow-up outcomes. METHODS: Outcomes of 12 hackathons from 2012 to 2015 in India, Uganda and the USA were measured using emailed surveys. To minimise response bias, non-responding teams were coded as having made no progress. RESULTS: 331 individuals provided information on 196 of 356 projects (55.1% response rate), with no difference in responses from teams participating in different countries (Cramer's V=0.09, p=0.17). 30.3% of projects had made progress after a mean of 12.2 months. 88 (24.7%) teams had initiated pilot testing, with 42 (11.8%) piloting with care providers and 24 (6.7%) with patients. Overall, 97 teams (8.1 per hackathon) drafted business plans, 22 (1.8 per hackathon) had filed patents on their innovations and 15 (1.3 per hackathon) had formed new companies. Teams raised US$64.08 million in funding (average US$5.34 million per hackathon; median award size of $1800). In addition, 108 teams (30.3%) reported at least one member working on additional technologies with people they met at a hackathon. Individual confidence to address medical technology challenges was significantly increased after attending (t(1282)=192.77, p 0.001). CONCLUSION: CAMTech healthcare hackathons lead to consistent output with respect to medical technology innovation, including clinical trials, business plan development, securing investment capital/funding and new company formation.

The interpretation of early medieval deviant burials has come to the fore in recent mortuary archaeology debates. Yet, critical discussion of how early medieval execution cemeteries are portrayed in museums and other media has received no critical attention. Using the prominent case study of Sutton Hoo, Suffolk, this chapter reveals the interpretative and ethical challenges inherent in narrating and visualizing later Anglo- Saxon judicial killing in the absence of well-preserved human remains, but instead through the recording and interpretation of carefully excavated “sand bodies.”

This report presents the results of three workshops that were designed, conducted, and assessed for the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. The purposes of the workshops were to (1) examine the effectiveness of workshops as mechanisms for obtaining feedback from utility personnel, including comparison of several different workshop procedures; and (2) obtain feedback for the NRC on topics of interest and concern. The workshops were held in NRC Regions I, II, and III between December 1981 and May 1982. A total of 60 utility personnel attended the workshops and offered comments and suggestions concerning staffing, engineering support in the control room, training tools, training programs, and licensing examinations. Workshop participants and observers evaluated the workshops favorably. Further assessment of the workshop process and content suggested that the workshops were effective in obtaining useful feedback for the NRC.

We describe a case of a 25-year-old Quiché (or K'iche') speaking G2P2022 (2 pregnancies, 2 term births, 2 live births) woman who was transferred from an outside hospital on postpartum day 3, to preserve mother-baby dyad while her infant required a higher level of care after suffering an apneic episode at 22 hours of life. Although the patient was a known Quiché speaker, lack of access to Quiché interpreters in the hospital led to the use of Spanish interpreters. Her treatment team subsequently described her affect as “flat” and reported “poor maternal care,” leading to a report to the Administration for Children's Services. As we analyze this case, we use person-centered maternity care as a framework to discuss areas for improvement in providing care to peripartum individuals, as well as cultural safety and humility as solutions to cultural gaps between patients and providers. [ Psychiatr Ann. 2022;52(12):500–503.]